| Subject: | 
	 Re: Attn: political message re Marcus Minucius Audens stands for Praetor Urbanus. | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Decius Iunius Palladius amcgrath@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:14:57 -0400 (EDT) | 
 
 | 
 
 
 
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, RMerullo wrote: 
 
> From: "RMerullo" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=194232192180194153138149203043129208071" >rmerullo@--------</a> 
>  
> Salvete Cives 
>  
> I put the "Attn" tag in the subject line to indicate that this is a 
> political message related to the campaign for Praetor.  Whoever dislikes 
> political messages may want to delete this. 
>  
> M Minucius Audens is to be praised louder than the sum of his excellent 
> qualifications that he provided in his announcement. 
>  
> I urge all my fellow citizens to give M Minucius Audens the opportunity to 
> apply his vast experience and knowledge to building our nation. 
 
 
Salve G. Mari Merulle, 
 
  You are quite right, M. Minucius Audens is far too modest about his 
abilities. He is one of the most capable people we have in Nova Roma and 
his administrative abilities are second to none in our Republic. He 
has responded to the call to serve Nova Roma as capably, honorably and 
willingly as he served the United States Navy. He can do many tasks at 
the same time and do them well. Not only has he served in a official 
capacity as military tribune, quaestor and currently as Editor of the 
Eagle and as my consular budgetary accensus (assistant) but 
he lends a helping hand to any who ask. For example his replies on the 
list to questions are complete, well thought out and unfailingly polite. 
He has set an example for many of us to follow. I agree with you that he 
should be given the opportunity to serve Nova Roma as praetor and hope the 
voters agree.  
 
Vale, 
 
Decius Iunius Palladius, 
Co-Consul of Nova Roma 
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
 
		 "Quis ita familiaris est barbaris,  
                  ut aram Victoriae non requirat!" 
 
   	             Quintus Aurelius Symmachus 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Announcement | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Decius Iunius Palladius amcgrath@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:45:18 -0400 (EDT) | 
 
 | 
 
 
Salvete!  
 
As quite a few of you know already--but most do not--I am getting 
married a week from Saturday, on October 2. For a few days before the 
2nd my online time will be minimal and from the **2nd through the 10th**  
I will be on my honeymoon in Florida (between hurricanes I hope) and quite 
unavailable. :)  
 
The ballot for the upcoming election will be published in an edict late on 
Monday the 27th at which time no more candidacies may be announced. There 
will also be a number of laws on the ballot that will be voted on. I will 
be preparing those with my co-consul and other magistrates over the next 
few days to present to you on that ballot. I will be here when the ballot 
is published in an edict and I will be back when the vote is completed but 
when the comitia centuriata is convened on October 4 to commmence 
voting, it will be convened solely by my capable colleague, Consul Lucius 
Cornelius Sulla. During that time any consular questions should be directed 
to him.  
 
I am currently training a censorial scribe who should be able to prevent 
me from having a backlog when I return, or at least I will have a 
managable backlog.  
 
 
Valete, 
 
Decius Iunius Palladius, 
Consul of Nova Roma 
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
 
		 "Quis ita familiaris est barbaris,  
                  ut aram Victoriae non requirat!" 
 
   	             Quintus Aurelius Symmachus 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 hadji hadji@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:35:22 +0200 | 
 
 | 
Salve Atticus, 
 
Well said. I agree. That is my opinion too. 
The only compromise for taxes in different countries could be done is 
for the taxes value. Romans had also had  different taxes in regard  to 
economy possibilities in a given province. 
For example avarage annual income in central european countries as 
Czech, Slovakia, Hungary and Poland is from 2400 to 3600 $. The other 
south-eastern countries (Roumania, Bulgaria,  Yugoslavia, Macedonia and 
Albania) have it about 800 to 2200 $. So , I think taxes must pay 
everyone, but the taxes value must be different and a part of these 
taxes must stay in a given province for the its own purposes.  
 
Valete 
 
Alexander Probus 
 
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 10:53:08 -0300 
   From: "Martins-Esteves" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=070059114056017198090218141036129208" >esteves@--------</a> 
Subject: Re: Taxes 
<I am sure that you, Audens, have the best intentions with your 
<proposal,but I honestly think that the problem of transfering currency 
<is not so big,and that every cives indistinctly in the world must pay 
<taxes, if it must be so. If some nationality has the obligation and the 
<right to pay taxes, all others must pay it too. Everyone must have the 
<right to say: ' I am a tax payer '. 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 money orders and stuff | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "from Joanne at work" sheberserker@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 14:12:10 CEST | 
 
 | 
 
 
Hi there Crys, 
 
>What about money orders?  Made out to Nova Roma in whatever 
>dollar amount each country decides on (deuch marks, ruppees, 
>dollars, francs, whatever).  Then sent to the nearest countrys 
>accountholder.  Or just sent to the US and deposited, exchange 
>rate be damned <G>. 
 
Money orders that are written in a currency other that ones local currency  
are very expensive and hard to get in some parts of Europe. For example:I  
live in belgium. If I need a money order in US dollars, i would have to pay  
about 15USD for it. So if I am sending 10 dollars to the US, I pay a total  
price of  25dollars..... 
On the other hand, Amex travellers check charge a 1% fee which means that  
when I send $10, I pay a total amount of $10.10. 
I know this subject is a bit boring! I have been working in International  
banks since 1985.... 
Warmest regards, 
Joanne 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Fees instead of Taxes? | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Don and Crys Meaker" famromo@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 07:42:02 -0500 | 
 
 | 
Salvete, 
 
OK, OK, so money orders aren't the greatest idea.  I get it now.   
Thanks Joanne! 
 
What about fees instead of taxes.  Won't the US government have  
a fit if we get tax exempt status and yet charge taxes? 
 
How about fees instead of taxes.  There could be, say a donation  
to Nova Roma for something.  I hesitate to say for prayers to the  
gods (as I myself would owe thousands for the Augur Dex <G>)  
because I do not believe the gods can be bought.  Perhaps  
something else can be arranged. 
 
What to charge fees for???  Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm 
 
How about: 
 
1.  Running for office 
2.  Applications (a fee for both minors and adults unless the minors  
are family to citizens and a fee for starting your own gens.  Maybe  
this is the way to weed out the serious from the not-so-serious) 
3.  Certificates (perhaps some of our office holders and priests  
would like a nice certificate to hang from the wall behind their  
monitor?) 
 
Just another money making suggestion. 
 
Crys 
 
P.S  Which reminds me.  I received a 2 year subscription to the  
Eagle about a year ago (when calling me penniless would have  
been generous).  I would like to give the second year back and ask  
Audens to please let me know where to send my subscription and  
where to send it to.  I also would like to resend pictures of Lapis  
and the little thank you article I prepared before the "Social Wars"  
(I think they are being called).  I will never get the hand written  
notes out at the rate I am going and I have to thank so many.  I will  
also post the article (or ask Audens to) to this list or to the Via  
Trames (as it will likely reek of sentimentality).  Would that be OK  
Audens? 
 
Crys (again) 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Cassius622@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:41:03 EDT | 
 
 | 
In a message dated 9/22/99 11:23:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,  
<--------ef="/post/nov----------------otectID=226107192180229130130232031248147208071048" >LSergAust@--------</--------; writes: 
 
<< No-one has mentioned yet how collecting money might affect our tax exempt  
 status in the U. S. -- is that not a problem? 
  >> 
 
Salvete,  
 
It shouldn't be. Virtually all nonprofit organizations collect dues from  
their membership. Nonprofit doesn't mean the organization can't have money -  
it simply means that any money taken in over and above operating costs is  
accounted for in a slightly different way. No bonus pay for CEO's, etc. I  
believe! ;) There are several books out on handling this for nonprofit  
organizations, and before any such plan were to be implemented we'd certainly  
want to be sure about all the rules, accounting practices, etc. I seem to  
remember that a yearly full accounting must be made public or some such...  
yet another subject to read up on! 
 
Valete,  
 
Marcus Cassius Julianus 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Name changes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Don and Crys Meaker" famromo@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 07:49:32 -0500 | 
 
 | 
Salvete, 
 
As a symbol of our new start my husband and I have (with out  
Paters permission, of course) changed our names. 
 
I will now be known as Amethystia Iunia Crystallina Materna. 
Don will be known as Gaius Iunius Placidus.  (we will try to be  
good and not have too big a problem with "C" being used in place  
of "G" <G>) 
 
Terry and Lapis will not undergo any name changes. 
 
Our 2 older boys will also be joining Nova Roma.  We have not  
worked the kinks out of their names, but they will also join the Iunia  
Gens. 
 
I wish to publicly thank my Paterfamilias for not breaking up our  
family, welcoming my husband, welcoming my step-sons and  
helping to choose our new names. 
 
Crys (I could never give that part of my name up <G>) 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Antonio Grilo" amg@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:59:07 +0100 | 
 
 | 
Salvete 
 
Can/Could Nova Roma accept credit card payment, e.g. to pay the Eagle and 
other Macellum articles? 
 
Valete 
 
Antonius Gryllus Graecus 
Senator et Magistratus 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 ATTN: Antonius Gryllus Graecus out for presentation and holidays | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Antonio Grilo" amg@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 14:37:49 +0100 | 
 
 | 
Salvete cives Novi Romani 
 
I'm going to depart today and I shall be back on October 26. 
 
Tomorrow, as Propraetor Provinciae Lusitaniae, I'm going to present Nova 
Roma at the 3rd Congress of Peninsular Archaeology, Vila Real, Portugal. 
Legata Emilia Camuna Britania is the chief organiser. Hope that that the 
Gods will help me to make good recruitment there =). 
I will later put my poster presentation in the Lusitania Web site. 
 
Valete omnes et Dis Romani vobiscum 
 
Antonius Gryllus Graecus 
Senator et Magistratus 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: ATTN: Antonius Gryllus Graecus out for presentation and holidays | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Antonio Grilo" amg@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 14:48:43 +0100 | 
 
 | 
Salvete 
 
A mistake =) 
I'll be back on October 6!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
 
Valete 
 
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Antonio Grilo <amg> 
To: <a href="mailto:novaroma@--------" >novaroma@--------</a> <a href="mailto:novaroma@--------" >novaroma@--------</a> 
Date: Thursday, September 23, 1999 2:42 PM 
Subject: [novaroma] ATTN: Antonius Gryllus Graecus out for presentation and 
holidays 
 
 
>From: "Antonio Grilo" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=243232178003185091033082" >amg@--------</a> 
> 
>Salvete cives Novi Romani 
> 
>I'm going to depart today and I shall be back on October 26. 
> 
>Tomorrow, as Propraetor Provinciae Lusitaniae, I'm going to present Nova 
>Roma at the 3rd Congress of Peninsular Archaeology, Vila Real, Portugal. 
>Legata Emilia Camuna Britania is the chief organiser. Hope that that the 
>Gods will help me to make good recruitment there =). 
>I will later put my poster presentation in the Lusitania Web site. 
> 
>Valete omnes et Dis Romani vobiscum 
> 
>Antonius Gryllus Graecus 
>Senator et Magistratus 
> 
> 
>> 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 jmath669642reng@--------) | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 09:50:36 -0400 (EDT) | 
 
 | 
I am really not sure what is entailed in gettig a Credit Card payment 
system.  I know there are some fairly small busnesses using such, and 
others that I know are not, becase their feeling that they are too 
expensive. 
 
I am also not sure what the requirements are to acquire such.  I ask 
Marcus Cassius Julianus as a businessman, have you looked into this 
payment method and if you have what is the cost and rules??.  If not can 
you direct me to someone who may have the information? 
 
The Credit Card may be a partial answer to the transfer of funds between 
countries.  I know that the major credit cards are honored almost 
everywhere in the world, but I am not sure about any out-of-country fees 
that may be levied.  
 
Respectfully; 
Marcus Minucius Audens 
 
Fair Winds and Following Seas!!! 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 jmath669642reng@--------) | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:37:31 -0400 (EDT) | 
 
 | 
Salvete, Citizens of Nova Roma; 
 
I have mailed the August Issue of the Eagle today.  I apologize for the 
lateness of the mailing, but the plan was overtaken by events.  However 
there is a silver linng in all this, in that the printing and postage 
did not cost Nova Roma anything and that is a saving of about $25.00 
with $2.00 to $3.00 thrown in for postage.  The printer, our own Marcus 
Cassius Julianus, also contributed a middle page to the newsletter, for 
which I am most appreciative.  Thank you Cassius!!!! 
 
In regard to subscripton fees.  The subscription fees that were settled 
upon in the last few months was $12.00 American.  Checks should be made 
out to Nova Roma.  Previous checks made out to myself have been cashed 
and another check for the same amount has been sent to the Financial 
Quaestor.  There are two members of NR who have sent checks to me for 
less than that amount.  Both amounts indicate that the checks were 
written based on the discussion of such and not the final decision.  I 
ask that those two individuals contact me by private mail and appraise 
me of your preferences. 
 
The current subscription number of Eagle is 49.  In the next three 
months this will be reduced by 6 as the current subscriptons run out. 
If you question where your subscription stands, a personal E-Mail to me 
will return the pertinent information to you.. 
 
Aprica will you please contact me in this regard?? 
 
I re-iterate again the need for articles for the Eagle.  When I took 
this job I was under no illusions about support from the citizens as it 
is the third such effort, that I have undertaken.  However the problem 
is that an unsupported editor, tends to move toward the material that 
interests him  / her for a variety of reasons  With my experience I will 
resist that temptation, but it would be beneficial for those in Nova 
Roma to consider some sort of input; it is after all your publication. 
Current ly the Eagle is running an average of 5 to 7 articles (Two Main 
feature articles and 3 to 5 information features).. 
 
There have been several articles on the net of late which are very 
interesting.  I have been thinking about copying them into the Eagle, 
but I will certainly need the authors permission,  What do you think of 
that idea??  I would also request a short article from the Consuls 
explaining the government action before the Senate and the other 
Magistrates Offices on a monthly basis.  I would also like to ask the 
Censors to provide the names and E-Mail addresses of the Nova Roma 
Citizanry  for the various provinces so that the Praetors of those 
provinces will have a working knowledge of who is there.  This material 
would be published for the update of everyone's address book. 
 
I thank you for your kind attention to this report. 
  
Very Respectfully; 
Marcus Minucius Audens 
Editor Eagle 
 
Fair Winds and Following Seas!!! 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Fees instead of Taxes? | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "RMerullo" rmerullo@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:51:54 -0400 | 
 
 | 
Salvete Crystallina et alii 
 
I think that the idea of bought NR certificates dovetails well with the 
concept of an incentive program for encouraging donations. 
 
Gnaeus Tarquinius Caesar and others have suggested that people earn some 
sort of recognition by contributing certain amounts of funds (either being 
enrolled in an ordo equester -- not to be confused with the ordo equester 
that we already sort of have -- by paying 25 bucks, or being listed 
somewhere on the website with an honorary title based on the magnitude of 
the donation).  I think that issuing a real, attractive certificate with 
some of the graphics that were to be featured in some of the other potential 
NR products, with an honorary title or something, would provide a nice 
additional incentive to donate funds. 
 
Also of interest is the idea that you mention of some kind of "bond" or 
payment by incoming magistrates.  But this is something to treat carefully. 
We don't want people to buy offices.  I therefore would recommend that we 
steer clear of having candidates pay anything during the campaign.  If we 
really are as broke as some suggest (it is impossible to be precise about 
this without real numbers publically posted of course), then it may make 
sense to have mandatory contributions to the treasury from incoming 
magistrates.  But that's kind of a last-ditch measure, don't you think?  It 
will be unfair to the magistrates to make them pay for the rest of us.  That 
is why we need the Senate to pass a budgetary consultum, the sooner the 
better, so that we can all understand where we stand financially and take 
appropriate action. 
 
Less unfair is to apply your idea of a certificate award to those 
magistrates who pay for it.  As an example, the winner of a future campaign 
for Praetor has the option of paying, say, $75, to receive a certificate 
that says Primus Secundus Manlius Praetor Novae Romae AUC XXXXX, or 
whatever, with the flag image and/or the Iuppiter or other image;  or not, 
in which case he serves as Praetor without the pretty piece of paper. 
 
I remain optimistic about the possibility of funding NR without imposed 
taxes or other forced payments, probably because I was donating money to NR 
at one time.  If I do it, I see no reason that others won't. 
 
As far as the US government goes, I have a question for our newly elected, 
but still lacking imperium consul: 
 
Can ANYONE (corporation, individual, not-for-profit or any other entity) 
legally collect taxes on US territory, other than the federal government, or 
a local or state administration? 
 
Valete 
 
Gaius Marius Merullus 
 
 
 
>From: "Don an--------ys Meaker" <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=230166014180193192112218004036129208" >famromo@--------</a> 
> 
 
>What about fees instead of taxes.  Won't the US government have 
>a fit if we get tax exempt status and yet charge taxes? 
> 
>How about fees instead of taxes.  There could be, say a donation 
>to Nova Roma for something.  I hesitate to say for prayers to the 
>gods (as I myself would owe thousands for the Augur Dex <G>) 
>because I do not believe the gods can be bought.  Perhaps 
>something else can be arranged. 
> 
 
>3.  Certificates (perhaps some of our office holders and priests 
>would like a nice certificate to hang from the wall behind their 
>monitor?) 
> 
>Just another money making suggestion. 
> 
 
> 
>Crys (again) 
> 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Service Qualification for Magistracies | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Nicolaus Moravius" n_moravius@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 09:09:32 PDT | 
 
 | 
Salvete! 
 
Just for the record, I am NOT advocating that Nova Roma become a military  
gerontocracy after the Spartan model. 
 
In response to the various criticisms of what I thought was a perfectly  
realistic and reasonable proposal by M. Minucius Audens that our magistrates  
should actually have some prior organisational experience, I'd like to offer  
this: 
 
It is true that military service, no matter how distinguished, does not  
necessarily indicate political or administrative ability: as has been  
pointed out, F. D> Roosvelt had none (but he did have lots of other  
experiential qualifications of the sort that Audens and I suggested were  
good equivalents). 
 
Conversely, General Ulysses (aka 'Useless') S. Grant had a distinguished  
military career but was a dismal President. The Duke of Wellington was a  
brilliant soldier but a poor British Prime Minister. 
I once worked with a Lieutenant Commander RN who got his rank through being  
a whizz database manager and an MSc in Computing. As a Naval officer he left  
a lot to be desired (he never got a sea appointment despite his promotion  
from Lieutenant in the 6 years I worked with him). 
 
You can always find exceptions to a rule, though. What I'm saying is that,  
in general terms, being able to survive a career in the Armed Forces, OR  
running your own business, OR having held an executive office in some other  
voluntary organisation similar to NR is a good indication that you can work  
with people, take responsibility for your actions and are able to do more  
than organise an orgy in a lupanaria (whorehouse) next door to a  
cerevisiaria (brewery). 
 
A purely academic CV, on the other hand (for example), doesn't even indicate  
that someone has any maturity or can do anything more than ruminate on  
informational cud. (I know, I know, on that basis of selection alone,  
Claudius would never have made Emperor...) 
 
So some of us will have to agree to disagree, I suppose. But would our  
government posts really be better filled by people with no track record, or  
downright incompetent, than not filled at all? 
 
Personally, I think the government of NR is too important to be trusted to  
anyone who can't give a reasonable proof that (s)he knows what (s)he is  
doing. It is always possible for the Censors to check credentials. Sensible  
democracy has to have its limits. Universal suffrage is not the same as  
universal candidacy. 
 
As to the objections raised that this matter is premature: how else are  
internal prerequisites for candidacies ever going evolve if we don't debate  
them? 
 
Valete, 
 
Vado. 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Fees instead of Taxes? | 
 
	| From: | 
	 jmath669642reng@--------) | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:24:34 -0400 (EDT) | 
 
 | 
To, Chrys / Marius Merrullus;; 
 
I think your idea in regard to certificates a very good one.  The idea 
now would be to rough design a certifcate for review of the Citizenship 
and once the agreement of the majority is reached then smooth the 
certificate and find out the printing cost.  I am as enthusiastic as is 
Merrullus in this regard.  It sounds like a great idea.  Perhaps Chrys 
with her skill at setting up Webpages could be pursuaded to design such 
a certificate with ideas provided from the rest of the Cives.  
 
Perhaps then the Certificates could be offered by one of the Ordo 
Equestor businesses for sale, or a new member could be considered for 
that purpose. 
 
Marcus Audens 
 
Fair Winds and Following Seas!!! 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 JSA varromurena@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 09:55:15 -0700 (PDT) | 
 
 | 
Well, just let me know the day the taxes kick in--so I 
can resign my citizenship and go into exile in 
Massilia.  
 
I, for one, am not going to be able to afford such. I 
make very little money, have large student loans to 
pay back, and am barely able to keep up membership in 
the various academic organizations for which I am 
"required" to keep up.  
 
 
Vale 
L. Licinius Varro Murena 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Service Qualification for Magistracies | 
 
	| From: | 
	 jmath669642reng@--------) | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:03:58 -0400 (EDT) | 
 
 | 
Salvete, Citizens; 
 
In response to the questions regarding the qualifications fr 
Magistrates, my list of suggested areas of qualifications was jst that, 
a list of suggestions.  Those of you not carig for the miltary 
experience as an idea, then Isuggest that you provide your own. 
Roosevelt  was a long time political animal and had served as the 
govenor of New York quite suceesfully prior to his presidency.  I 
believe that the Govenor of a state qualifies for a quality admiistrato, 
and as the Govenor served as the Commander of the States Military 
Militia. 
 
Eisenhower and Bush were both Presidents who publicly indicated that 
their military background had helped them in thier administrative  and 
command duties.  They "understood" the system and that is the thust of 
this thread. 
 
Winfield Scott was a senior General Officer that could not be believed 
by the U.S. voter to be the candidate for President, but it was he who 
negotiated  the U.S. and Canada out of the potential "Pig War" that 
nearly became  an active war on St John's Island  in Washinton State. 
 
As an NCO in the mlitary of Britain, if you recognize the errors of your 
superior in  his duties, over a given period, and have a good idea of 
what you would do in his place, then that knowledge and experience is 
valuable to this thread. 
 
As one other gentleman has indicated that insuring candidates follow the 
Curus Honorium is a sufficient training / qualification procedure, but 
that requires people to stand for office.  The failure for those to 
stand for office deprives the NR of a better selection.  It also leads 
to doubling up with offices and that leads in turn to a possible short 
-circuiting of the very item that we rely upon to train our magistrates. 
In my view a combination of experiences as well as the Cursus Honorium 
is required, if only to list as credits for the candidacy.  After all 
the voters must finally decide the issue.  If we cannot trust a 
potential magistrate to tell the truth about his / her credits then they 
certainly are not material to hold office and can be asked to stand 
down.. 
 
I also join with Vado is his question;, if these matters are not 
discussed in forum, amicably and without scorn or impatience how will 
anything be discussed?.  We have up-to-now relied upon individual 
interest to bring up thread topics for discussion.  If there are those 
in NR who think that we should be discussing other things, then perhaps 
if you would be so kind as to draw up a list of topics in order of 
priority and submit them to the Citizens for comment, it would probably 
make things more efficient. 
 
Remember Cives, these are just ideas, and not full-blown proposals to 
the Senate.  They do not have the force of law, nor anywhere close to 
it. 
 
Valete, Citizens; 
Very Respectfully; 
Marcus Minucius Audens. 
 
Fair Winds and Following Seas!!! 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Africa | 
 
	| From: | 
	 JSA varromurena@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:08:15 -0700 (PDT) | 
 
 | 
 
 
--- Don an--------ys Meaker <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=230166014180193192112218004036129208" >famromo@--------</a> wrote: 
> From: "Don an--------ys Meaker" <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=230166014180193192112218004036129208" >famromo@--------</a> 
>  
> Salvete, 
>  
> Does anyone know how far the Romans got into Africa? 
>  
 I suppose you are talking of Africa the continent 
instead of Africa Provincia?  
 
Official presence was not much more than the coastal 
strip in what is now Libya, and the far side of the 
Atlas in what is now Tunisia (Africa Provincia 
proper), Algeria, and Morocco. However, my 
understanding is that Roman merchants (as the 
Carthaginians before them) penetrated down the W. 
African coast, probably to what is now Gambia, as well 
as to places such as Jenne and Timbuktoo. In East 
Africa Roman merchants went at least as far south as 
Somalia/Kenya, and a Roman army in the time of 
Augustus penetrated far up the Nile, to about the old 
Kushite capital of Napata.  
 
If you want, I can send you links to a collection of 
documents I put online at the Internet History 
Sourcebook of works by Roman geographers/historians 
about Mauretania, Numidia, and Kush. 
 
L. Licinius Varro Murena 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 jmath669642reng@--------) | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:18:58 -0400 (EDT) | 
 
 | 
To JSA; 
 
Salve JSA; 
 
In regard to your comments about taxes, I assure you that prior to the 
"Social Wars" when Q,Fabius, Sulla and I put forward a formal proosal 
for such there was a clause which reduced the taxes for students and 
similar situations.  here was also provision to seek an exemption from 
taxes either completely or partially.  The Senate never to my knowledge 
approved, disapproved or gave reason for thier inacton.  It was I 
believe still tabled at the time of the SW. 
 
Those of us searching for a way to finance that which you are enjoying 
are looking at all manner of ideas for the fairly steady income that 
will let us  (NR) have an income free of taxes if at all possible.  If 
that is not possible then a fair and equitable system od dues / taxation 
must be established or let a few people financially support the rest.  I 
do not happen to subscribe to the feeling that everybody should "get off 
their butt and earn the money required" as it must be obvious to even 
the most casual observer that opportunity and availability, not to 
ention health, family situations affect every possible aspect of that 
situation. 
 
I should not think that you need worry overly about self-exile to 
Massila.  It is my belief tat you are too valuable to NR to allow that 
to happen. 
 
Vale, JSA 
Very Respectfully; 
Marcus Minucius Audens  
 
Fair Winds and Following Seas!!! 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Africa | 
 
	| From: | 
	 JSA varromurena@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:20:56 -0700 (PDT) | 
 
 | 
 
 
--- RMerullo <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=194232192180194153138149203043129208071" >rmerullo@--------</a> wrote: 
> From: "RMerullo" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=194232192180194153138149203043129208071" >rmerullo@--------</a> 
>  
> Salvete Crystallina et alii 
>  For more information on Roman 
> rule in Africa and Egypt, 
> you could look at "Provinces of the Roman Empire" by 
> Theodor Mommsen.  It is 
> a boring book, but the author is recognized as one 
> of the great scholars of 
> Roman history. 
>  
 
Sorry, but I would not recommend Mommsen to any but an 
academic audience. True, Mommsen was and remains one 
of the great historians of Rome, but his work is 
nearly a century out of date. There has been much done 
archaeologically since, which has considerably changed 
our vision of Roman Africa. A much better work to 
begin with is: 
 
S. Raven, _Rome in Africa_, 3d Ed., London: Routledge, 
1993. 
 
Vale 
L. Licinius Varro Murena 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Fees instead of Taxes? | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Don and Crys Meaker" famromo@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:28:33 -0500 | 
 
 | 
On 23 Sep 99, at 12:24, James Mathews wrote: 
 
> Perhaps Chrys 
> with her skill at setting up Webpages could be pursuaded to design such a 
> certificate with ideas provided from the rest of the Cives.  
 
I could do that.  I could even post it on a site that the civie would  
have access to long enough to print it out OR the Censors or  
whoever is in charge of that sort of thing could print it out and snail  
mail it.  That way someone with a better printer than I have (and  
Publisher) would be able to have control of who has it and who  
doesn't.  We know that web addresses have a way of being found  
out.  We wouldn't want the address given out so any idiot can  
claim to be a member, right? 
 
Crys (getting ideas already -- Audens can talk me into anything  
<G>) 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Africa | 
 
	| From: | 
	 jmath669642reng@--------) | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:26:58 -0400 (EDT) | 
 
 | 
To Licenius Varro Murena; 
 
My dear sir.I would be most interested in any links that you may have 
regarding Geograhers in the empire and the republic in Africa or in 
Europe or the Near East 
 
Thank You for your kind consideration; 
 
Marcus Minucius Audens 
 
Fair Winds and Following Seas!!! 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Don and Crys Meaker" famromo@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:34:08 -0500 | 
 
 | 
On 23 Sep 99, at 9:55, JSA wrote: 
 
> I, for one, am not going to be able to afford such. I 
> make very little money, have large student loans to 
> pay back, and am barely able to keep up membership in 
> the various academic organizations for which I am 
> "required" to keep up.  
>  
>  
> Vale 
> L. Licinius Varro Murena 
 
Been there, done that.  I would suggest there was a "student fee"  
of say $.50 to be picked up by the NR government (upon receipt of  
proof of "studenthood"). 
 
OR maybe some sort of sponsorship program, like the one which  
provided me with my current subscription to the Eagle (Audens  
made a point to me privately).  Some civie or other would let it be  
known (to the right people, NOT publicly as that would be  
showboating and noone here would ever do anything like that I am  
sure) that they can carry x amount towards civie Taxes or  
something. 
 
I haven't paid taxes in years.  Whether someone can do that or not  
depends on how much Pride is holding them back. 
 
Crys 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Africa | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Don and Crys Meaker" famromo@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:37:26 -0500 | 
 
 | 
On 23 Sep 99, at 10:08, JSA wrote: 
 
>  
> If you want, I can send you links to a collection of 
> documents I put online at the Internet History 
> Sourcebook of works by Roman geographers/historians 
> about Mauretania, Numidia, and Kush. 
 
That would be nice, thanks.  And thanks for the information. 
 
Crys 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Martins-Esteves" esteves@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 14:45:35 -0300 | 
 
 | 
Salve M. Minuci 
Avete Quirites 
 
(Audens) 
>I believe that earlier in my message from which you took your excerpt, I 
>mentioned that anyone who was an NR member could pay the taxes if they 
>felt the need.  If I did not say that it certainly  was an omission that 
>I regret. 
 
Primo a word about excerpts. I did not have the intention of distorting your 
words. If I did so, I am sorry.  If I took an excerpt of you last message, 
it was only with the purpose of organizing my own message and making it 
clearer. I find it confusing to read a message full of quotted text and 
unnecessary (and even pernicious to the ones with problems with internet 
conection speed) to post in integra the commented message, for anyone can in 
most circumstances read it before reading the answer to it. But it is a 
matter of taste and de gustibus non disputandum. I will post your entire 
message at the end of mine just in case. 
 
You actually said "that anyone who was an NR member could pay the taxes if 
they felt the need". And I did not ignore that statement, but my point is 
that if an obligation exists just to some people, than it is as odiosa as it 
were a right. I said that the difficulties of collecting taxes around the 
world cannot be used as an argument to introducing such a dangerous 
distinction about nationalities in NR, which is exactly one of our biggest 
problems. 
 
(Audens) 
>May 
>I most respectfully suggest that if you disagree with my proposal that 
>you work out a counterproposal taking into consideration those in NR not 
>having English and propose a fair way to make some kind of consideration 
>that appeals to them.  Since you have a clearer view of such from your 
>standing outside the U.S. I await your comments with anticipation. 
 
One more time I am sorry, Audens. I am not given to pure criticism and I 
didn't mean to attack your purpose. As I am not an English speaker,  it is 
not so simple for me to write a message -- it demands obviously more time 
than writing in the languages with wich I am familiar, and time is something 
I unfortunately don't have. So my rare messages to the list are mostly less 
expressive than I would have liked. 
 
I think the only way for the supranationalization of NR is to strengthen the 
Provinciae. If we had, in Brazil, for instance, an organized administration 
we could have more and more active citizens here. So, as an ideal to strive, 
each Provincia should collect the taxes in her territory and repass a 
percentage to the Res Publica. However, while the Provinciae are not 
properly organized, each citizen indistinctly should pay taxes to the Res 
Publica, in case taxes there will be . I really do not know how the 
collection could be made, but it seems good the proposal of using credit 
cards. Another possibility could be international mail bonus, I don't know 
if that's the proper name. It could be used by the Eagle or any official 
correspondance. 
 
So,  optimum would be that  each Provincia would collect her taxes, but 
while it is not factible let all the cives pay them directly to Roma Nova. 
 
Valete 
 
T. Horatius Atticus 
 
 
>My Dear Atticus; 
> 
>I believe that earlier in my message from which you took your excerpt, I 
>mentioned that anyone who was an NR member could pay the taxes if they 
>felt the need.  If I did not say that it certainly  was an omission that 
>I regret. 
> 
>You yourself are a case in point.  As an English-Speaking person outside 
>the English -speaking countries,(my assumption) you have the full 
>benifit of membership except perhaps the opportunity to visit 
>get-gethers on this continent.  As such I would expect that you would 
>pay your fair share to NR should such a tax be introduced.  But others 
>from countries other than the English-Speaking countries who are members 
>of NR but do not have English like two members of my Gens in Hungary, 
>must enjoy NR in a secondary manner through translation.  They are not 
>lesser people in any way for not having English, but rather do not enjoy 
>fully the exchange as you or I do.  I think and my proposal reflects 
>this,  that NR should give some consideration to these people.  That the 
>topic is important, as has already been proven with the loss of several 
>citizens because of this situation. 
> 
>I don't think it is the intention of anyone here in NR to cast anyone 
>into slavery, in order to give them a break.  That was not the purpose 
>of the proposal.  It was as you so very kindly said, "well meant".  > 
>I believe that you must admit that many non-Americans consider the U.S. 
>to be less than sympathetic to the world's problems outside of U.S. 
>boundaries.  One of my efforts since I have first gone to a foriegn 
>country many years ago was tio dispell this feeling in some very small 
>and insignificant way.  I am still working on that premise. 
> 
>Vale, Atticus; 
>Very Respectfully; 
>Marcus Minucius Auens. 
> 
>Fair Winds and Following Seas!!! 
> 
> 
>> 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 JSA varromurena@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 11:08:32 -0700 (PDT) | 
 
 | 
Perhaps a free subscription to The Eagle might make 
the idea of paying taxes more palatable to those of us 
for whom membership in NR is, as yet, of little 
practical worth. Thus, as part of our membership dues, 
we get a subscription.  
 
L. Licinius Varro Murena 
 
--- James Mathe--------lt;a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=045232113165042200148200112241225012177026038196249130152150" >jmath669642reng@--------</a> --------e: 
> From: <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=045232113165042200148200112241225012177026038196249130152150" >jmath669642reng@--------</a> (James Mathe--------/font> 
>  
> Salvete, Citizens of Nova Roma; 
>  
> I have mailed the August Issue of the Eagle today.  
> I apologize for the 
> lateness of the mailing, but the plan was overtaken 
> by events.  
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Martins-Esteves" esteves@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 15:04:52 -0300 | 
 
 | 
 
 
Avete Romani 
 
>Perhaps a free subscription to The Eagle might make 
>the idea of paying taxes more palatable to those of us 
>for whom membership in NR is, as yet, of little 
>practical worth. Thus, as part of our membership dues, 
>we get a subscription. 
> 
>L. Licinius Varro Murena 
 
Bravissimo! And by these means all the cives would be more acquainted with 
NR and would be encouraged to be more active. 
 
Atticus 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Service Qualification for Magistracies | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Mike Macnair MikeMacnair@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 14:21:28 -0400 | 
 
 | 
Salvete! 
 
L. Sergius Australicus wrote,  
 
>You can't get enough people to serve in the magistracies and other jobs 
and yet  
>you're already discussing job requirements that would have the effect of  
>preventing some people from serving. ... Military service in some 
macronation's armed forces,  
>while it might be laudable and honorable, has nothing whatsoever to do  
>with determining anyone's ability to serve Nova Roma well.  
 
I agree entirely. However, I think that some form of use of the "century 
points" - i.e. service to NR - devised by Germanicus as a threshold for 
standing for the senior offices is not a bad idea and serves as an analogue 
for the ancient roman requirement of military service. Certainly preferable 
to age limits, which are unenforceable in a virtual organisation. As I 
suggested in my original email, a dispensation for the first few years of 
NR's existence is necessary and clearly meets Australicus' first point. 
 
Valete 
 
M. Mucius Scaevola Magister 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Africa | 
 
	| From: | 
	 JSA varromurena@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:02:54 -0700 (PDT) | 
 
 | 
 
 
--- James Mathe--------lt;a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=045232113165042200148200112241225012177026038196249130152150" >jmath669642reng@--------</a> --------e: 
>> My dear sir.I would be most interested in any links 
> that you may have 
> regarding Geograhers in the empire and the republic 
> in Africa or in 
> Europe or the Near East 
>  
> 
 
Ok, here they are. Keep in mind that the sources we 
are able to post online are mostly confined to Public 
Domain (i.e., pre-1923)--which means in some cases 
better translations are available, but they are under 
copyright (thus, if you want to do serious work, 
consult your local college library). Also, the 
Internet Sourcebook is an ongoing project, which means 
not every source has as yet been posted--but I'm 
working on it. 
 
With that caveat in mind: 
 
This first one is a collection of accounts relating to 
Nubia/Kush. 
<a href="http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/nubia1.html" target="_top" >http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/nubia1.html</a> 
 
This next one is a collection of accounts relating to 
Numidia/Mauretania. 
<a href="http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/anc-nafrica.html" target="_top" >http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/anc-nafrica.html</a> 
 
Others, including the accounts of Caesar, Pliny, and 
the Periplus, can be found at the Internet African 
History Sourcebook: 
<a href="http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/africa/africasbook.html" target="_top" >http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/africa/africasbook.html</a> 
 
For anyone interested, I am including some ancient 
accounts of pre-Islamic Arabia, which includes the 
disastrous Roman invasion: 
<a href="http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/arabia1.html" target="_top" >http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/arabia1.html</a> 
 
Perhaps someday the NR webmistress can include links 
to the Ancient History Sourcebook, for which a NR 
citizen (namely, myself) am the Contributing Editor. 
 
L. Licinius Varro Murena 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Roman Visions | 
 
	| From: | 
	 JSA varromurena@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:34:25 -0700 (PDT) | 
 
 | 
Salvete! 
 
So, before I'm forced to Masillia under Interdict 
aquae et ignis, a few thoughts on what NR may wish to 
do in the coming century. 
 
The first, and the most easily doable (I think) would 
be a Roman equivalent of those Med/Ren faires that are 
so popular today. Let's call it "Roman Times". So 
you'd have citizens walking about in togas and stolas, 
performing public sacrifices, selling Roman-style 
food, etc. Instead of a mock-joust, you have 
mock-gladiatorial games, maybe even a chariot race. 
And since Roma Antiqua encompassed such a large 
proportion of the ancient world, you can also have 
booths or programs reflecting the world of the Celts, 
Germans, Africans, Egyptians, Greeks, Persians, 
Babylonians, etc. These could also have their own 
public sacrifices/worship too. Perhaps a re-enactment 
of Cannae (or some less ambitious skirmish). Something 
by Terence or Plautus too for the more dramatically 
inclined. But try to avoid the faux-Roman stuff you 
see in Las Vegas. 
 
Second, a bit more ambitious, perhaps later in the 
century, is something akin to those Medieval Times 
shows--Roman times, with Roman food (and dining on 
couches?), with a show later--gladiatorial probably, 
but maybe also some Roman farce or play. 
 
Third, the most difficult, but doable if the resources 
are there, an actual Roman town where the citizens 
live and work (yes, with updates, we can have 
electricity, computers, etc. or whatever they're using 
in 2090 CE), NOT like a Disneyesque place, perhaps 
more like Colonial Williamsburg. A living, working 
community, perhaps with a bit of role-playing for 
tourists (like Williamsburg has slaves, though they're 
not real slaves) to bring in some money.  
 
Any other ideas? 
 
Valete 
L. Licinius Varro Murena 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Lucius Cornelius Sulla alexious@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:11:36 -0700 | 
 
 | 
Salve 
 
As one who had 4 businesses that accepted Credit Cards...Most banks offer 
Credit transfers that woudl even accept international Credit Cards....I know 
for a fact that my businesses (which I tried at one time to get in NR) 
Accepted all Major Credit Cards...the only one that insisted using a 
different method of acceptance is American Express.  Hope this helps. 
 
L. Cornelius Sulla 
Consul 
 
James Mathews wrote: 
 
> From: <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=045232113165042200148200112241225012177026038196249130152150" >jmath669642reng@--------</a> (James Mathe--------/font> 
> 
> I am really not sure what is entailed in gettig a Credit Card payment 
> system.  I know there are some fairly small busnesses using such, and 
> others that I know are not, becase their feeling that they are too 
> expensive. 
> 
> I am also not sure what the requirements are to acquire such.  I ask 
> Marcus Cassius Julianus as a businessman, have you looked into this 
> payment method and if you have what is the cost and rules??.  If not can 
> you direct me to someone who may have the information? 
> 
> The Credit Card may be a partial answer to the transfer of funds between 
> countries.  I know that the major credit cards are honored almost 
> everywhere in the world, but I am not sure about any out-of-country fees 
> that may be levied. 
> 
> Respectfully; 
> Marcus Minucius Audens 
> 
> Fair Winds and Following Seas!!! 
> 
>  
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Fees instead of Taxes? | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Lucius Cornelius Sulla alexious@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:14:35 -0700 | 
 
 | 
Salve.... 
 
Before the Social Wars, Appius Cato, sent an e-mail to me that I forwarded to 
the Senate...regarding Citizenship documents, selling them to the Civies, 
listing such infomraton as the date they were approved...possible framing and 
such.  If anyone is interested I will be more than happy to dig up the e-mail. 
I thought this had potential. 
 
L. Cornelius Sulla 
Consul 
 
RMerullo wrote: 
 
> From: "RMerullo" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=194232192180194153138149203043129208071" >rmerullo@--------</a> 
> 
> Salvete Crystallina et alii 
> 
> I think that the idea of bought NR certificates dovetails well with the 
> concept of an incentive program for encouraging donations. 
> 
> Gnaeus Tarquinius Caesar and others have suggested that people earn some 
> sort of recognition by contributing certain amounts of funds (either being 
> enrolled in an ordo equester -- not to be confused with the ordo equester 
> that we already sort of have -- by paying 25 bucks, or being listed 
> somewhere on the website with an honorary title based on the magnitude of 
> the donation).  I think that issuing a real, attractive certificate with 
> some of the graphics that were to be featured in some of the other potential 
> NR products, with an honorary title or something, would provide a nice 
> additional incentive to donate funds. 
> 
> Also of interest is the idea that you mention of some kind of "bond" or 
> payment by incoming magistrates.  But this is something to treat carefully. 
> We don't want people to buy offices.  I therefore would recommend that we 
> steer clear of having candidates pay anything during the campaign.  If we 
> really are as broke as some suggest (it is impossible to be precise about 
> this without real numbers publically posted of course), then it may make 
> sense to have mandatory contributions to the treasury from incoming 
> magistrates.  But that's kind of a last-ditch measure, don't you think?  It 
> will be unfair to the magistrates to make them pay for the rest of us.  That 
> is why we need the Senate to pass a budgetary consultum, the sooner the 
> better, so that we can all understand where we stand financially and take 
> appropriate action. 
> 
> Less unfair is to apply your idea of a certificate award to those 
> magistrates who pay for it.  As an example, the winner of a future campaign 
> for Praetor has the option of paying, say, $75, to receive a certificate 
> that says Primus Secundus Manlius Praetor Novae Romae AUC XXXXX, or 
> whatever, with the flag image and/or the Iuppiter or other image;  or not, 
> in which case he serves as Praetor without the pretty piece of paper. 
> 
> I remain optimistic about the possibility of funding NR without imposed 
> taxes or other forced payments, probably because I was donating money to NR 
> at one time.  If I do it, I see no reason that others won't. 
> 
> As far as the US government goes, I have a question for our newly elected, 
> but still lacking imperium consul: 
> 
> Can ANYONE (corporation, individual, not-for-profit or any other entity) 
> legally collect taxes on US territory, other than the federal government, or 
> a local or state administration? 
> 
> Valete 
> 
> Gaius Marius Merullus 
> 
> >From: "Don an--------ys Meaker" <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=230166014180193192112218004036129208" >famromo@--------</a> 
> > 
> 
> >What about fees instead of taxes.  Won't the US government have 
> >a fit if we get tax exempt status and yet charge taxes? 
> > 
> >How about fees instead of taxes.  There could be, say a donation 
> >to Nova Roma for something.  I hesitate to say for prayers to the 
> >gods (as I myself would owe thousands for the Augur Dex <G>) 
> >because I do not believe the gods can be bought.  Perhaps 
> >something else can be arranged. 
> > 
> 
> >3.  Certificates (perhaps some of our office holders and priests 
> >would like a nice certificate to hang from the wall behind their 
> >monitor?) 
> > 
> >Just another money making suggestion. 
> > 
> 
> > 
> >Crys (again) 
> > 
> 
>  
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Lucius Cornelius Sulla alexious@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:19:13 -0700 | 
 
 | 
Salve... 
 
You arent the only one with school loans.  I do very much understand 
that....considering I am paying for school loans for my Associates, 
Bachelors and now Masters Degree.  You are talking in the realm of 
astrobucks.  Not to mention when I start going to law school.  However, in 
the realm of NR taxing.  I think 10.00-15.00, the price of 2 movie tickets 
isnt something that is going to put anyone out on the streets.  Believe me, 
I feel for everyone in debt.  As I am there myself.   Just my 2 cents.. 
(which I cant afford either...LOL) 
 
L. Cornelius Sulla 
Consul 
 
JSA wrote: 
 
> From: JSA <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=081166091180193192130061163101147165026048139046" >varromurena@--------</a> 
> 
> Well, just let me know the day the taxes kick in--so I 
> can resign my citizenship and go into exile in 
> Massilia. 
> 
> I, for one, am not going to be able to afford such. I 
> make very little money, have large student loans to 
> pay back, and am barely able to keep up membership in 
> the various academic organizations for which I am 
> "required" to keep up. 
> 
> Vale 
> L. Licinius Varro Murena 
>  
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Taxes | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Lucius Cornelius Sulla alexious@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:22:31 -0700 | 
 
 | 
Salve...that is in the proposal that Audens, Q.Fabius and I proposed.. :) 
Already ahead of ya there on that one! :) 
 
L. Cornelius Sulla 
Consul 
 
JSA wrote: 
 
> From: JSA <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=081166091180193192130061163101147165026048139046" >varromurena@--------</a> 
> 
> Perhaps a free subscription to The Eagle might make 
> the idea of paying taxes more palatable to those of us 
> for whom membership in NR is, as yet, of little 
> practical worth. Thus, as part of our membership dues, 
> we get a subscription. 
> 
> L. Licinius Varro Murena 
> 
> --- James Mathe--------lt;a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=045232113165042200148200112241225012177026038196249130152150" >jmath669642reng@--------</a> --------e: 
> > From: <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=045232113165042200148200112241225012177026038196249130152150" >jmath669642reng@--------</a> (James Mathe--------/font> 
> > 
> > Salvete, Citizens of Nova Roma; 
> > 
> > I have mailed the August Issue of the Eagle today. 
> > I apologize for the 
> > lateness of the mailing, but the plan was overtaken 
> > by events. 
>  
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Fees instead of Taxes? | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "RMerullo" rmerullo@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 17:01:22 -0400 | 
 
 | 
Salvete Consul Luci Corneli et alii 
 
How about the legality of collecting taxes under US law?  Would NR have to 
conclude a tax treaty or something with the US?  How would the existence and 
nature of Nova Roma Corporation (a NH corporation having applied for 
tax-exempt status identified as the legal/financial arm of Nova Roma under 
the constitution) impact such legality/illegality, if at all?  Tax law may 
or may not be your concentration, but I would think that as a law student 
you would have a good idea where to check this out. 
 
I wouldn't mind looking at Appius Cato's ideas on certificates.  If you can 
find that e-mail easily, please send it my way. 
 
Valete 
 
Gaius Marius Merullus 
 
 
 
>From: Lucius Corn--------s Sulla <a hr--------/post/novaroma?prot--------D=243128192154082190130232203077129208071" >al--------us@--------</a> 
> 
 
>Before the Social Wars, Appius Cato, sent an e-mail to me that I forwarded 
to 
>the Senate...regarding Citizenship documents, selling them to the Civies, 
>listing such infomraton as the date they were approved...possible framing 
and 
>such.  If anyone is interested I will be more than happy to dig up the 
e-mail. 
>I thought this had potential. 
> 
>L. Cornelius Sulla 
>Consul 
> 
> 
>> From: "RMerullo" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=194232192180194153138149203043129208071" >rmerullo@--------</a> 
>> 
 
>> As far as the US government goes, I have a question for our newly 
elected, 
>> but still lacking imperium consul: 
>> 
>> Can ANYONE (corporation, individual, not-for-profit or any other entity) 
>> legally collect taxes on US territory, other than the federal government, 
or 
>> a local or state administration? 
>> 
>> Valete 
>> 
>> Gaius Marius Merullus 
>> 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Fees instead of Taxes? | 
 
	| From: | 
	 SDmtwi@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 18:28:42 EDT | 
 
 | 
Salvete, 
 
Caius Marius Merullus wrote: 
> Also of interest is the idea that you mention of some kind of "bond" or 
>  payment by incoming magistrates.  But this is something to treat carefully. 
>  We don't want people to buy offices.  I therefore would recommend that we 
>  steer clear of having candidates pay anything during the campaign. 
 
One thing we could do, though, is have candidates pay a nominal fee for the  
privilege of running.  As long as the fee was low enough to avoid being  
exclusionary and identical for all candidates, it would both be fair and  
avoid the kind of thing Caius Marius is worried about. 
 
Valete, 
T Labienus Fortunatus 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Another passing thought | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Jenni Hunt moonloon@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 18:42:34 -0400 | 
 
 | 
At 10:00 AM 09/22/1999 -0400, you wrote: 
>(If I missed anyone my apologies!!) 
 
Don't forget me!   
The lone Roman in Rhode Island . . . 
 
Jenni 
(I. Ovidia Luna) 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Fees instead of Taxes? | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "RCW" alexious@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 15:43:43 -0700 | 
 
 | 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: RMerullo <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=194232192180194153138149203043129208071" >rmerullo@--------</a> 
To: <a href="mailto:novaroma@--------" >novaroma@--------</a> 
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 1999 2:01 PM 
Subject: [novaroma] Re: Fees instead of Taxes? 
 
 
> From: "RMerullo" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=194232192180194153138149203043129208071" >rmerullo@--------</a> 
> 
> Salvete Consul Luci Corneli et alii 
> 
> How about the legality of collecting taxes under US law?  Would NR have to 
> conclude a tax treaty or something with the US?  How would the existence 
and 
> nature of Nova Roma Corporation (a NH corporation having applied for 
> tax-exempt status identified as the legal/financial arm of Nova Roma under 
> the constitution) impact such legality/illegality, if at all?  Tax law may 
> or may not be your concentration, but I would think that as a law student 
> you would have a good idea where to check this out. 
 
Sulla:  I can do some research on it....at the Los Angeles Law Library.  I 
dont think we would have to worry about hte taxes once we register as a Not 
for Profit Corporation, since that does the registering for us.  The thing, 
that we must be accountable for is not overstepping the Not-For-Profit 
Clauses once the paperwork goes through.  I have worked for California 
Baptist College (A Not-For-Profit, Public Benefit Corporation and the Not 
For Profit Religious Corporation) and there are alot of restrictions in 
terms of dealing with the fiances.  Yeah I can definately, on my day off, 
Mon or Tuesday research just what the restrictions are in terms of filing 
for that status. 
 
Sulla:  The primary benefit for American Civies, is that when we are able to 
say we are a NfPC is that we can deducte those proceeds from our Taxes, 
which is something that I have been waiting for.... (I can use the write 
offs) 
 
> I wouldn't mind looking at Appius Cato's ideas on certificates.  If you 
can 
> find that e-mail easily, please send it my way. 
 
Sulla:  Certainly, when I am back at home (I am at work now) I will dig 
through my NR e-mail and see what I can find and post it to the list.  I 
really liked his idea...Cassius at one point, I think I am recalling 
correctly, was looking at a similar idea.  Lets see if we can get this 
going...it would be a good idea for the Ordo! 
 
L. Cornelius Sulla 
Consul 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Fees instead of Taxes? | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "RCW" alexious@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 15:59:46 -0700 | 
 
 | 
> Caius Marius Merullus wrote: 
> > Also of interest is the idea that you mention of some kind of "bond" or 
> >  payment by incoming magistrates.  But this is something to treat 
carefully. 
> >  We don't want people to buy offices.  I therefore would recommend that 
we 
> >  steer clear of having candidates pay anything during the campaign. 
> 
> One thing we could do, though, is have candidates pay a nominal fee for 
the 
> privilege of running.  As long as the fee was low enough to avoid being 
> exclusionary and identical for all candidates, it would both be fair and 
> avoid the kind of thing Caius Marius is worried about. 
 
Sulla:  Wait wait wait.....While I agree this might be something we can 
possible think about in the future, I have to agree with L. Serg. and point 
out once again...that we have yet to fill our offices completely.  This is 
way to premature for something of this magnitude.  I recall, at one time, 
Decius Iunius ask all magistrates to pay some money, I was  unable to at the 
time, being unemployed.  But, making a requirement to pay for office, I 
disagree. 
 
L. Cornelius Sulla 
Consul 
 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Fees instead of Taxes? | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Mike Macnair MikeMacnair@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:11:00 -0400 | 
 
 | 
Salvete! 
 
Merullus writes, 
 
>How about the legality of collecting taxes under US law?  Would NR have to 
>conclude a tax treaty or something with the US?   
 
I don't think that calling it "taxes" makes any difference to what it is 
any more than the Mormons calling theirs "tithes". At the end of the day as 
a matter of macro-state law any such arrangement is not a tax but 
contractual membership subscriptions to a voluntary organisation. It's only 
a "tax" if you can't resign from the State and hence decline to pay! 
 
I don't know about the New Hampshire law of nonprofit organisations, but in 
England subscriptions make no difference to charitable status. Hell, BUPA - 
the main provider of medical insurance - is a charity here! 
 
Valete, 
 
M. Mucius Scaevola Magister 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Roman Visions | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Steven Robinson amgunn@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:46:10 -0700 | 
 
 | 
Hailsa Allir Romanii! 
 
Piparskegg (Venator) here: 
 
JSA wrote: 
>  
> From: JSA <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=081166091180193192130061163101147165026048139046" >varromurena@--------</a> 
>  
> Salvete! 
>  
> So, before I'm forced to Masillia under Interdict 
> aquae et ignis, a few thoughts on what NR may wish to 
> do in the coming century. 
>  
> The first, and the most easily doable (I think) would 
> be a Roman equivalent of those Med/Ren faires that are 
> so popular today. Let's call it "Roman Times". (snip) 
> Perhaps a re-enactment of Cannae (or some less ambitious skirmish). (snip) 
>  
> Valete 
> L. Licinius Varro Murena 
> 
Hej, I could probably get up a bunch of Germanii and Scandii to do up a 
recreation of Teutbergerwald <Big Evil Grin> with Nova Roma's Legions. 
<All Hail the Honored Adversary!> 
 
Seriously, this is good goal.  Perhaps a Nova Roma equivalent of the U.S. or 
English Civil War reenactments, with the fair and living history village as 
an anchor to the whole.  And, perhaps we can learn from what the less 
culturally serious recreation groups do well. 
 
In Frith - Piparskegg (Valete - Venator) 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	  Re: Service Qualification for Magistracies | 
 
	| From: | 
	 Cassius622@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 22:41:47 EDT | 
 
 | 
Salvete,  
 
I didn't get to respond to this thread since my computer is busy dying once  
again.  
 
It seems best to start by saying that it's understood that Marcus Minucius  
Audens was merely bringing up an idea for discussion here. No harm in that!  
Far better we discuss various ideas for making Nova Roma better than start  
personal arguments, etc.  
 
However, I can't help but chime in and say that I personally have never  
served in the military, nor have been through any of the  
institutions/organizations which Marcus Audens has also cited for their  
potential to build character, discipline and leadership qualities. I've led a  
pretty quiet civilian life in fact... school, college, work.  
Nova Roma managed to be founded without those qualifications on MY part  
anyway, although Germanicus may well have served in the military at some  
point.  
 
I must say I believe that where a person has been doesn't make the  
difference. It's what they DO. ;) 
 
Valete,  
 
Marcus Cassius Julianus 
Senator 
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/23/99 12:04:13 PM EST, <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=045232113165042200148200112241225012177026038196249130152150" >jmath669642reng@--------</a> --------es: 
 
<< In response to the questions regarding the qualifications fr 
 Magistrates, my list of suggested areas of qualifications was jst that, 
 a list of suggestions.  Those of you not carig for the miltary 
 experience as an idea, then Isuggest that you provide your own. 
 Roosevelt  was a long time political animal and had served as the 
 govenor of New York quite suceesfully prior to his presidency.  I 
 believe that the Govenor of a state qualifies for a quality admiistrato, 
 and as the Govenor served as the Commander of the States Military 
 Militia. 
  
 Eisenhower and Bush were both Presidents who publicly indicated that 
 their military background had helped them in thier administrative  and 
 command duties.  They "understood" the system and that is the thust of 
 this thread. 
  
 Winfield Scott was a senior General Officer that could not be believed 
 by the U.S. voter to be the candidate for President, but it was he who 
 negotiated  the U.S. and Canada out of the potential "Pig War" that 
 nearly became  an active war on St John's Island  in Washinton State. 
  
 As an NCO in the mlitary of Britain, if you recognize the errors of your 
 superior in  his duties, over a given period, and have a good idea of 
 what you would do in his place, then that knowledge and experience is 
 valuable to this thread. 
  
 As one other gentleman has indicated that insuring candidates follow the 
 Curus Honorium is a sufficient training / qualification procedure, but 
 that requires people to stand for office.  The failure for those to 
 stand for office deprives the NR of a better selection.  It also leads 
 to doubling up with offices and that leads in turn to a possible short 
 -circuiting of the very item that we rely upon to train our magistrates. 
 In my view a combination of experiences as well as the Cursus Honorium 
 is required, if only to list as credits for the candidacy.  After all 
 the voters must finally decide the issue.  If we cannot trust a 
 potential magistrate to tell the truth about his / her credits then they 
 certainly are not material to hold office and can be asked to stand 
 down.. 
  
 I also join with Vado is his question;, if these matters are not 
 discussed in forum, amicably and without scorn or impatience how will 
 anything be discussed?.  We have up-to-now relied upon individual 
 interest to bring up thread topics for discussion.  If there are those 
 in NR who think that we should be discussing other things, then perhaps 
 if you would be so kind as to draw up a list of topics in order of 
 priority and submit them to the Citizens for comment, it would probably 
 make things more efficient. 
  
 Remember Cives, these are just ideas, and not full-blown proposals to 
 the Senate.  They do not have the force of law, nor anywhere close to 
 it. 
  >> 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Roman Visions | 
 
	| From: | 
	 "Don and Crys Meaker" famromo@-------- | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 22:26:38 -0500 | 
 
 | 
On 23 Sep 99, at 19:46, Steven Robinson wrote: 
 
> Hej, I could probably get up a bunch of Germanii and Scandii to do up a 
> recreation of Teutbergerwald <Big Evil Grin> with Nova Roma's Legions. 
> <All Hail the Honored Adversary!> 
 
Couldja hold off another month or two?  Lapis is really threatening  
to walk on me.  I think he's preparing for his military career, if the  
way he pulls his sisters hair is any indication. <G> 
 
Crys Materna 
 
 
 
 | 
	| Subject: | 
	 Re: Re: Fees instead of Taxes? | 
 
	| From: | 
	 dean6886@--------) | 
 
	| Date: | 
	 Thu, 23 Sep 1999 23:01:14 -0500 (CDT) | 
 
 | 
  This can be made very simple. To the US  government the term yearly 
membership fees would apply. Here in Nova Roma it would be referred to 
as taxes in all probability. Why is this so difficult to understand? 
Legally in some instance there may be a need to notate the term yearly 
fees as a matter of practice. Sulla or any other law students or 
lawyers--- the ball is in your court. 
 
 Gaius Drusus Domitianus 
 
 
 
 
 |