Salvete, Quiriti. 
 
Nicolaus Moravius wrote: 
 
> Consider by way of contrast, if you will, the indecent haste which got us 
> Brits. our rather embarrassing 'God Save the King' (or, currently, 'Queen'). 
> The English Whigs borrowed it from the Jacobites 
> and first sang it publicly to celebrate their first victory over them in 
> 1745. We've been stuck with the dam' thing ever since. I believe it is the 
> oldest national anthem known - if so, it proves that there's such a thing as 
> historical progress. 
 
It became a very popular tune for national songs.Imperial Germany had at least 
three patriotic songs to that tune 
One was solid navy (Kaiser und Admiral), the Kaiser's Birthday song 
and "Heil Dir im Siegeskranz" which was an Imperial national anthem. 
And the U.S. got "My Country T'is of Thee" which I never liked 
(I have several dislikes of the "Pilgrims"). 
"Senatus Publiusque 
Romanum Imperium 
We give you rebirth..." 
A Definite "Non" on that one. Eh? 
 
 
> Anyway, that's what happens when you want something in a hurry. Perhaps we 
> should sponsor a competition, say for the next Apollonian Games? (Not that a 
> winner need be declared afterward, just to give us time to see what we can 
> produce). 
 
This idea sounds like a good beginning to me.The contest and the caveat that the 
winner is 
Not the Official Anthem.  But it will put ideas in front 
of the citizens. 
 
I would suggest that it be a known tune that most can get through some means. 
I can do better with Cyrrilic than I can with musical notation, so sheet music 
would leave me and other such illiterates out in the cold. MIDI files would 
work. 
For the sake of legal hassles, or simple paranoia about them, any tune should 
be in the public domain.  That is what, at lest 75 years old without whatever 
copyright extensions that might apply?  Other than that I can see it ranging 
from the light hearted 
to the ponderously serious.  Latin should get automatic extra points. Otherwise 
ANY of 
the languages of the Quirites Nova Romanum.  [You *have* noticed I can't do 
correct endings?] 
Just some thoughts inspired by Moravius. 
 
> For myself, having a dim recollection of sitting on the floor of the bar at 
> the Pagan Federation Annual Conference in London last night, fitting the 
> tune of the European Union's Federal Anthem ('An die Freude' from 
> Beethoven's Ninth) to the words of Lewis Carrol's 'The Lobster Quadrille', I 
> hereby declare myself mentally unfit to make any further sensible 
> contribution in this particular area of Nova Roman endeavour. 
 
"Lobster Quadrille"?  Why not?  I think one of the best national songs is 
"Waltzing Matilda",largely because it is a song the people of a national 
adopted, rather than being a construct 
to please "most" political elements, or the political tide of the period. 
"Dixie" is another good one, 
but not for us. 
 
Enough! 
 
Bene vale. 
C. Aelius Ericius. 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
Zaidman, Louise Bruit and Pauline Schmitt Pantel, 
_Religion in the Ancient Greek City_, trans. Paul 
Cartledge (Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1992), xx + 
278pp., maps and line drawings, ISBN 0-521-41262-5 
(hardcover), 0-521-42357-0 (paperback), originally 
published in French as _La Religion grecque_ (Paris, 
Armand Colin, 1989). Four parts, fifteen chapters. 
  
This study is divided into four major divisions:  
1)How should we study Greek civic religion?; 
2)Cult-practices;  
3)Systems for representing the divine; 
4)Conclusion. 
  
The aim of this study, as the authors explain in 
their preface, was not "to write a grand synthesis on 
Greek religion," but to provide an introductory 
framework reflecting recent work in the field. In this 
regard, they have done an admirable job! However, this 
work is more than just a simple exposition of trends 
in the field, as per Jan Bremmer's update of Burkert's 
 _Greek Religion_, but an interpretive study that 
stands well on its own. True, it does not have the 
encyclopedic thoroughness of Burkert's synthesis, but 
for that reason it is far more valuable, especially 
for those beginning the study of ancient Hellenic 
polytheism. The prose translation by Paul Cartledge, 
who also updated the work even further, reads very 
smoothly, which also makes this study in many ways 
more valuable by avoiding the turgid academic language 
found in Burkert.  
  
One of the key aspects of this study is the attempt 
to see Hellenic religion through the eyes of its  
ancient practitioners, to grasp its alienness from 
ourselves, and, especially, to avoid the monotheistic 
bias so typical of work in this field. At times it is 
very tempting to think the authors are themselves 
practicing pagans--making this work even 
more valuable for the modern pagan.  
 
Their discussion of ancient concepts such as "the 
sacred," "purity and pollution," "piety", "ritual," 
"prayer," and "sacrifice" is quite enlightening in 
regard to the meaning of the ancient terms to the 
ancients, along with expository descriptions of the 
actual methods in use by the ancients--which draw upon 
literary, epigraphic, anthropological, and 
archaeological evidence.  
  
Additionally, I found the chapters on Religious 
personnel and Places of cult to be most 
enlightening, and particularly valuable to the modern 
practitioner, as were those on religious associations 
and rites of passage. The charts and discussions of 
the various mythological genealogies also proved most  
enlightening.  
 
However, for this reviewer, the most valuable 
discussion was this study's explanation of the web 
of inter-related interests of the gods, and how and 
why 
the gods were worshipped in different ways in 
different cities and regions, or even within the 
same city--problems which are rarely resolved 
satisfactorily  by other studies. In short, with any 
event in their lives, such as marriage, death, birth, 
planting, harvesting, etc., the ancient Hellenes 
prayed and sacrificed to many gods and spirits, each 
of which impacted the outcome of any given event.  
  
For example, the Hellenic girl, facing marriage, 
prayed not merely to Hera, but also to Zeus, 
Artemis, Hymen, Peitho, Hermes, Demeter, Athene, and 
Aphrodite (among others), all done according to set 
rules and symbolism, tied in to a highly ritualistic 
structure emphasizing the change from childhood to 
adulthood, and married life. The reason is similar to 
those with whom we, today, must deal in our own 
events. For example, if we wish to drive our first 
car, we must 
deal with a driving instructor and various driving 
examiners to receive a driving license; car  
salespeople; perhaps bankers to get the money to buy 
the car; along with various mechanics and others to 
keep the car running. All these, and others, are 
required for us to drive our cars successfully; 
similarly, the ancients had to deal with any number 
of gods and spirits for a marriage, a childbirth, 
etc., 
to be successful.  
  
Also, the authors do a wonderful job explaining why 
each city will usually have a number of temples and 
cult places dedicated to the same deity, but each 
with differing rituals. Rather than the equivalent of 
"parish churches", the deities, like humans, can be 
approached for different kinds of help, but must be 
so  approached in different ways. Thus, for example, I 
might be approached as a friend, sibling, lover, 
teacher, lawyer, writer, researcher, etc., for 
different kinds of help, but the method of approach 
will differ depending on what kind of help one aims 
to ask from me. Similarly, the ancients approached 
deities who had different functions and powers.  
 
All in all, then, this is the book on ancient 
Hellenic religion one should read and study as an 
introduction. Only after this work has been mastered 
should one turn to other, more advanced studies, such 
as Burkert's encyclopedic synthesis.  
 
This study considerably enlarged my knowledge of 
ancient Hellenic polytheism, enabling me to see the 
"system" (if one wishes to call it that) which would 
have been quite apparent to the ancients, but which, 
due to the alienness of its structure, seems utterly 
lacking to us moderns. While highly readable, I 
nonetheless was forced to read this study at a slow 
pace, due entirely to the intellectually compelling 
connections and ideas which occurred to me about other 
forms of ancient polytheism (eg., Roman, Egyptian, 
Babylonian, Indian, etc.) as I read nearly every page. 
Nonetheless, I found my reading of this study a 
thoroughly engaging, fascinating, and enriching 
experience, which anyone interested in the workings of 
ancient polytheism--not just that of the Hellenes, but 
also those of all other peoples--would do well to 
read. 
  
L. Licinius Varro Murena  
> thus receives my highest recommendation 
> __________________________________________________ 
> Do You Yahoo!? 
> Bid and sell for free at <a href="http://auctions.yahoo.com" target="_top" >http://auctions.yahoo.com</a> 
>  
 
 
 
 |