Subject:	Re: ATTN PLEBEIANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Comitia Plebis Tributa
From:	Decius Iunius Palladius <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=243232219108127031050199203252129208071" >amcgrath@--------</a>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 00:00:21 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Antonio Grilo wrote:

> From: "Antonio Grilo" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=243232178003185091033082" >amg@--------</a>
>
> Salve
>
> You are likely to be right. Maybe we have to wait for the current voting to
> finish.
>
> Could the curator, rogator or censores clarify?

Frankly, I don't see how this can be done. Numerous votes have already
been cast for the law as it was already written. Once the ballot is
finalized and presented to the people, nothing can be added to it in my
view. Votes cast now would be for a different law that would essentially
invalidate all votes previously cast.

Vale,

Decius Iunius Palladius,
Censor





>
> Valete
> Antonius Gryllus Graecus
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George VanDeWater <a href="/po--------ovaroma?protectID=251166234193056045244038203219129208071" >VanDeWGe@--------</a>
> To: <a href="mailto:novaroma@--------" >novaroma@--------</a> <a href="mailto:novaroma@--------" >novaroma@--------</a>
> Date: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 8:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [novaroma] ATTN PLEBEIANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!: Comitia
> Plebis Tributa
>
>
> >From: George VanDeWater <a href="/po--------ovaroma?protectID=251166234193056045244038203219129208071" >VanDeWGe@--------</a>
> >
> >Salve Antonio,
> >I am confused. Do we not already have candidates for these positions.?
> Hasn't the voting alredy begun? Do those who have voted, go back and vote on
> this new version of Lex Crylla?
> >
> >Valete
> >
> >>>> "Antonio Grilo" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=243232178003185091033082" >amg@--------</a> 12/08 12:28 PM >>>
> >From: "Antonio Grilo" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=243232178003185091033082" >amg@--------</a>
> >
> >Salvete cives
> >
> >I hereby make the new version of the Lex Crylla de securandis magistratus
> >plebis part of the ballot for the Comitia Plebis Tributa. In case it is
> >approved, this new version shall be adopted instead of the former lex.
> >
> >Moreover I extend this Comitia Plebis until:
> > -Wednsday, 15 December, 1700 EST (2300 Roman Time, 1400 Pacific Time).
> >
> >I'm specially grateful for the feedback provided by Gnaeus Tarquinius
> >Caesar, candidate for Tribunus Plebis.
> >
> >The new version reads as follows:
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >Lex Crylla de securandis magistratus plebis
> >
> >If no candidates for Tribunus Plebis or Aedilis Plebis declare in December,
> >within 3 months from the end of the elections, the Senate must provide for
> >at least one magistrate to occupy each of those magistracies, by
> appointment
> >of plebeian citizens. Aspirants to an office should be examined in the
> >following order of preference:
> >1 - Candidates to other offices, who have lost in the previous elections;
> >2 - Magistrates currently serving that office;
> >3 - Any other citizens;
> >If after this examination there are still vacancies, the Senate shall
> >appoint Senators to fill the required magistracies.
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >
> >Valete
> >Antonius Gryllus Graecus
> >Tribunus Plebis
> >
> >
> !
> >
>
> !
> >
> >
> >
> >>
>
> >

Subject:	Re: Other Criticisms To Minimum Age Law
From:	Decius Iunius Palladius <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=243232219108127031050199203252129208071" >amcgrath@--------</a>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 00:20:41 -0500 (EST)

Let's see, how to answer this without having the lictors take the rods out
of the fasces...


On Wed, 8 Dec 1999 <--------ef="/post/nov----------------otectID=113082020165082153015098190036129" >Exitil@--------</--------; wrote:

> From: <--------ef="/post/nov----------------otectID=113082020165082153015098190036129" >Exitil@--------</--------;
>
> In a message dated 12/7/99 11:45:46 PM Central Standard Time,
> <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=243232219108127031050199203252129208071" >amcgrath@--------</a> writes:
>
> >
> > Frankly, I don't care what other "micronations" do. We dwarf most of them
> > in size and we have *real world goals*--they do not.
>
> Real world goals which could have been accomplished long ago with decent
> leadership. Not to mention you plan on being a church more than an actual
> nation. No, I dont want to get the argument started again, I'm just pointing
> it out that Nova Roma is not now, or planning to be, something I would
> call a nation.


I see, Rome *was* built in a day, my mistake. Everything should have been
done long ago. Please, *think* for a moment--Nova Roma is exactly 1 year,
9 months and 8 days old. We turn two years old in March 2000. During that
time, you think all our major goals could have been accomplished? How, by
magic I suppose? We have a fairly small (though growing) and widely
scattered population. We possess limited though growing resources, and a
have political and religious system that is still being put together. So
far, all these goals are being accomplished and I have every confidence
that our successors in the coming years will continue this work. All this
takes time, however, and is being done by people with *lives* who do this
in their part time, with little reward but the work and more than enough
complaints. This isn't Caesar III or SimCity. It takes real effort.

We are developing a sense of national community which is really the first
step. In that we have been successful though much needs to be done,
especially in the area of increasing participation.

Nova Roma will accomplish its goals, but it takes time and commitment by
many people. It is a long term project that requires one to work for the
future, often without seeing any immediate and tangible accomplishment.
What is important is that we have a goal and are determined to reach it.



Decius Iunius Palladius,
Consul of Nova Roma

Subject:	ATTN Plebeians: Comitia Plebis Tributa
From:	"Antonio Grilo" amg@--------
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 10:20:19 -0000

Salvete cives

It was confirmed to me that the Ballot cannot be changed during the voting
period.
For that reason, I refrain from presenting the new version of the Lex Crylla
de securandis magistratus plebis for voting in this assembly.
The deadline for voting is again Monday, 13 December, 1700 EST (2300 Roman
Time, 1400 Pacific Time).

The current version of the Lex Crylla de securandis magistratus plebis
already guarantees the plebeian magistracies in case of no candidates, but
as pointed out by some people, it has the limitation of not allowing
citizens other than senators to be appointed to the vacant positions. The
new version solves the problem. In fact it is also attractive because
defeated candidates for other magistracies have the possibility of occupying
a plebeian magistracy and thus their efforts are not wasted.
As such, I leave a pleas for the next Tribuni to revise the Lex and approve
the new (or even a newer =)) version of the Lex.

Thanks to all those who have participated in the process, either in favour
or against the lex:
Gaius Marius Merullus
Marcus Minucius Audens - Candidate for Consul
Decius Iunius Palladius - Candidate for Curator Differum
Gnaeus Tarquinius Caesar - Candidate for Tribunus Plebis
Lucius Sergius Australicus - Candidate for Tribunus Plebis


Valete

Antonius Gryllus Graecus
Tribunus Plebis

Subject:	A couple of questions
From:	"Don and Crys Meaker" famromo@--------
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 08:29:39 -0600

Salvete,

I have a couple of questions. Whoever can answer, please do.

1. Is there, or will there ever be, a law which states (I am not
always good with words) that you must be a civie for x-years before
running for ANY office? I think the age restriction is WAY past
due. I support it. Always have. Truth be told (and this might
amuse Cassius) I am thrilled that it is coming about so quickly
<G>.

2. Could someone please explain the point system to me again?
A private email will work fine. Ya'll know I'm dense <G>.

3. Where is NR with the religion thing again. I remember
something about going for religious exemption. NR being known
as a church isn't the worse thing that can happen to it. I can go
into a Catholic church (matter of fact volunteered my services to a
friend who is marrying into the Catholic church --- her choice, silly
thing <G>), so I don't see why it would change NR in any way,
unless members REALLY DO have a problem with the Religio, in
which case they shouldn't be here if they can't be tolerant.

BTW I am working on a list (quite short actually) of holidays which
would justify a day off of work. Should NR become recognized as
a religion, it would help should bosses have a problem when you
take any of the listed holidays off.

I think that's it for my questions right now. Thanks in advance.

Pax,
Amethystia Iunia Crystallina Materna
Priestess for Juno

Subject:	Re: Reply To Quintus Fabius Maximus.
From:	"Antonio Grilo" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=243232178003185091033082" >amg@--------</a>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 17:25:50 -0000

Salvete

>If the minimum age law were already passed, in these election the 27 year
old would for sure hold an >office, because in some of these there aren't
enough candidates!
In my opinion, we cannot assure the numbers only. Quality is better than
number. Experience (of course not alone) can be a measure of quality, as can
the past history of the candidate in the Cursus Honorum. In fact I think
that the Cursus Honorum should be enforced, and if there are no candidates
to fill all the offices, it is responsibility of the Senate to fill the
rest.
I will then be sure that Nova Roma lives some good years, enough to for
these measures to be regarded as nothing but a shadow of the past.
Remember: Quality is better than Quantity. That was what the Romans taught
to many a nation.

Valete
Antonius Gryllus Graecus
Candidate for Praetor

Subject:	Re: A couple of questions
From:	<a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=045232113165042200148200112241225012177026038196249130152150" >jmath669642reng@--------</a> (James Mathe--------/td>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 13:39:51 -0500 (EST)

Salve, Mistress Chrys;

I'll give some of your questions a try;

--There is now a law being voted upon which will, if passed, restrict
the ages of those wishing to run for the Cursus Honorium. There has
been quite a bit of discussion about this law pro and con of late
regarding its unfairness to younger people, even though the law has a
clause to enable the government to recognize special cases of the
younger people who distinguish themselves. As to whether there will
ever be a law to that effect will be up to the Citizens of Nova Roma.

--I too would appreciate some reference information on the century point
system. Fimbria's question of the Censors peaked my curiosity as
well!!!

--Religio Romano; I'm probably the last person to address this question,
but as an observer, it seems to me that the Religio Romano is striding
along very well with the Governent of NovaRoma in taking its rightful
place as a full partner in the re-establishment of the Roman Republic.
Of course in some places and for some people, the Religio will never
move fast enough, and for some it is moving too fast, but it seems to me
that it is making solid advances with good appointments towards a
meaning place in the world of Nova Roma and in the outside world as
well. Those holding religious offices to my mind are good ciizens with
an eye to the success of thier charge and willing to work for its
success, and not just argue about it. I am more than pleased to be
linked to such a paradighm in whatever minor role that I may have and I
am pleased by the friends that I have made who a workrs for the Religio.

I hope those few words have helped i some small way. I of course bow to
the opinions of more astute observers in the area of the Religio Romano.

Vale, Priestress;
Very Respectfully;
Marcus Minucius Audens

Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!

Subject:	Of Voting and Following One's Nose
From:	"Nicolaus Moravius" <a --------="/post/novaroma?protectID=091089014007127031215056228219114187071048139" >n_moravius@--------</a>
Date:	Thu, 09 Dec 1999 10:52:31 PST

Salvete, Quiriti:

Scripsit hodie Graecus:

>I hereby make the new version of the Lex Crylla de securandis magistratus
>plebis part of the ballot for the Comitia Plebis Tributa. In case it is
>approved, this new version shall be adopted instead of the former lex.
>
>Moreover I extend this Comitia Plebis until:
> -Wednsday, 15 December, 1700 EST (2300 Roman Time, 1400 Pacific Time).
>
>I'm specially grateful for the feedback provided by Gnaeus Tarquinius
>Caesar, candidate for Tribunus Plebis.
Et iterum:

>As you know, the primary concern of a Praetor is the administration of the
>Law. <AMPUTATIO>>I think that the priority of a Praetor is in fact the
>enforcement of the
>Constitution and Law - in fact the Law has meaning only if enforced.
>Closely Following is the edification of the Civil Law of Nova Roma. In my
>view, this must be based on the Ancient Roman Civil Law, but adapted to our
>time. Of course what I mean by adaptation includes human rights and equal
>rights between man and woman, the right to the difference either of race,
>sexuality, etc..

Respondeo: I would ask our Lusitanian Praetorian candidate this: does he not
also agree that laws cannot have meaning when magistrates attempt to rewrite
them at the very time they are already being voted on? Would he not also
agree that every citizen in Nova Roma has a right to vote on the same law
today that another citizen voted on yesterday, if it is within the period
alloted for voting? And if so, must he not therefore admit that he has been
'following his own nose'
lately, as he accuses his co-candidates of doing?

Valete bene,

Vado.

Subject:	The (non-) Church of Nova Roma
From:	"Nicolaus Moravius" <a --------="/post/novaroma?protectID=091089014007127031215056228219114187071048139" >n_moravius@--------</a>
Date:	Thu, 09 Dec 1999 11:07:06 PST

Salvete:

I see that "Exitil" has resumed his irritating habit of referring to Nova
Roma as a Church.

To add to the sensible things Palladius, Sulla and Merullus have already
said in reply:

The word 'Church' derives from the Greek 'Kyriou Oikos' ("The House of the
Lord"). Now 'oikos' can be translated as meaning both church as building, or
church as people, or as 'family' or as 'household' ('familia' or 'domus' in
Latin).

These are common metaphors used by early Latin and Greek Christian writers,
but to the best of my knowledge were never used by pagan writers to describe
their own religious institutions.

However used, the term is clearly appropriate only to monotheistic cults
(and, possibly, Mithraic temples). Even if it weren't, it suggests an
organisation or institution run, or at least headed, by priests (and/or a
single divine being), and that isn't true of NR, either.

For me, one of the great intrinsic virtues of the Religio Romana is that the
official cult was never prescriptive towards private religious belief and
practice, and that flamens and pontiffs of the official cult didn't mix it
with secular legislation. As far as I can see, our reconstruction of the old
Republic in NR parallels this laudable arrangement.

Let us, please, have no more nonsense posted to this List in the form of
dogmatic pronouncements on the subject of religion by people who haven't
studied it because (as they have admitted previously) it doesn't interest
them.

Valete bene in pace deorum,

Vado.

Subject:	Re: Of Voting and Following One's Nose
From:	"Antonio Grilo" <a href="/post/novaroma?prote--------=243232178003185091033082" >amg@--------</a>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 19:06:59 -0000

Salve Moravi et omnes

>And if so, must he not therefore admit that he has been
>'following his own nose'
>lately, as he accuses his co-candidates of doing?
In fact I've been following not only my nose, but that of others too. When I
presented the new version of the law I knew I would be accused of doing
that. So, I receive your criticism with due sense of justice and I agree
your speech is deserved. For that reason, I humbly ask the plebeians of Rome
to forgive me.
Nevertheless, if my conscience can have any rest is due to the fact that I
know that the new version of the law is better than the first. Not because
it serves my interest, but because it serves better the interest of Nova
Roma.
I must add that a real assembly in ancient Rome must have been more dynamic,
with much discussion taking place before voting. Unfourtunately we use the
electronic medium, and I as a web designer I know exactly why it is
difficult to add things to the ballot after voting has started.
On the other hand, if you read a couple of postings ahead, I have removed
the new version of the Law after receiving confirmation that my act was not
possible.

Vale
Antonius Gryllus Graecus
Tribunus Plebis and Candidate for Praetor

Subject:	Re: The (non-) Church of Nova Roma
From:
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 14:11:30 EST

In a message dated 12/9/99 1:07:29 PM Central Standard Time,
<a --------="/post/novaroma?protectID=091089014007127031215056228219114187071048139" >n_moravius@--------</a> writes:

> I see that "Exitil" has resumed his irritating habit of referring to Nova
> Roma as a Church.

As I've said before, its not meant as an insult, and I only speak on the list
once a while as not to interefere much with what happens. I like seeing what
goes on, but once in a while I do like to voice my opinion, such as in
reference to the age laws which then branched out to the reference of Nova
Roma to a church. What I mean by "church" is that Nova Roma seems to pay
close attention to the philosophical, religious, and moral side of Rome
(which seemingly is what you want) while paying little attention to other
aspects of the restoration. Again, it is only about voicing an opinion, and
I'm not trying to irritate anyone though that seems to be an unfortunate side
effect.

Subject:	And Another Thing...
From:	"Nicolaus Moravius" <a --------="/post/novaroma?protectID=091089014007127031215056228219114187071048139" >n_moravius@--------</a>
Date:	Thu, 09 Dec 1999 11:19:11 PST

Etiam salvete ad iterum...

Scripsit "Exitil":

> > Real world goals which could have been accomplished long ago with decent
> > leadership. Not to mention you plan on being a church more than an
>actual
> > nation. No, I dont want to get the argument started again, I'm just
>pointing
> > it out that Nova Roma is not now, or planning to be, something I would
> > call a nation.

Respondeo illo: I disagree, O puer (I can't remember your name because you
never use it): you ARE trying to get this argument started again. Let me
point out something I thought perfectly obvious, but which you have
evidently missed: in each one of a couple of hundred homes across the world,
there is a place that is forever Roman. This is REAL. You can call it what
you like. I call it the Nation of Nova Roma.

Vado.

Subject:	legionary food and diet ?
From:	"LegionXXIV" <a h--------"/post/nova--------?p--------ctID=226056178009193116001195151189114012071048139" >LegionXXIV@--------</a>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 14:33:20 -0500

VICESIMA - QUARTA
LEGION XXIV - MEDIA - ATLANTIA

* PROVINCIA PENNSYLVANIA *
* MEDIA - ATLANTICA * AMERICIA *

Defending the Frontiers of Ancient Rome
in the Mid - Atlantic Province
of North America

December 9, 1999
Year of Rome 2752

Avete et Salutatio... Commilitones

Hello and Greetings from Gallio Velius Marsallas,
Praefectus, Legio XXIV Media-Atlantia;
Tribune Militaris - NovaRoma - Gens Velia
aka George W. Metz
13 Post Run Newtown Square, PA 19073-3014
<a h--------"/post/nova--------?p--------ctID=034056178009193116001195151189114012071048139" >legionXXIV@--------</a> 610-353-4982
<a href="http://www.legionXXIV.org" target="_top" >http://www.legionXXIV.org</a>


Can any of you provide data on legionary food and meals
to -------- commilito Ric-------- Janos? <a --------="/post/novaroma?protectID=194176219122167031172149000248244208071048" >ric--------os@--------</a>

He writes Salve!
I would like to get more information on the XXIV legion and possible joining
along with my young son. But, for the moment, then place were I work is
having an Ethnic luncheon'. Most of the dishes are usually spanish, hindu,
of eastern europe. I wanted to serve a true Roman dish. I found some
recipes for cooking a Roman meal, but I wanted the meals served to the
legions during their campaigns.
Any help in this area would be appreciated.


Sincerely
Richard D. Janos
Vale!


My uneducated response was:

I have not come across any specific menus or details
on the Roman Legionary diet. I generally suppose
that the legionaries procured their food on the move;
such as small animals killed and grain stuffs captured
or obtained, probably by force or intimidation ; from
local farmers and towns people.
Some food supplies and preparations were probably
carried in the baggage train of the unit.
We can be sure that the rations were not that great;
probably worse than the much maligned "K" rations.

Thanks for any help you can provide and please copy
me in for my own education.


Check out our Website <a href="http://www.legionxxiv.org" target="_top" >http://www.legionxxiv.org</a>
It is loaded with links to other roman legions, suppliers
and contacts, along with historical roman organizations
and data. Our "Links" pages, "Roman Names" page,
"Glossary" and "TimeLines" are quite comprehensive.
Take a look.



As always, I remain;
(take your pick)

Tuus in Sodalicio Imperium Romanae
Yours in the Comradeship of the Roman Empire

Tuus in Sodalicio Respublica Romanae
Yours in the Comradeship of the Roman Republic

Gallio / George


O====<|| S P Q R ||>====O
L E G I O
X X I V
M A

ooooooooooooooo
O====|<|| S P Q R ||>|====O
|O ================O|
|| | | ||
|| | L E G | ||
|| | X X I V | ||
|| | M A | ||
|| | | ||
|| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||
\/ | | \/
| |
| |

Subject:	Permission
From:	Diana Aventina <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=114176113185158237169037163101249089000144044067209130152" >diana_aventina@--------</a>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 11:56:23 -0800 (PST)

To whom it may concern,
I would like to include a page on Nova Roma in my PF
International newsletter. Both Audens and Vado will both
bear witness that it is not a big thing--only about 300
people read it, but I would like to give Nova Roma some
publicity (free of charge :-)

I would like to "copy and paste" some bits and pieces from
the Nova Roma website. So I would like your official
permission before doing this.
Please get back to as soon as possible as I would like to
have the next issue out the door by Tuesday.
Bright Blessings,
Diana
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: <a href="http://shopping.yahoo.com" target="_top" >http://shopping.yahoo.com</a>

Subject:	Attn Graecus
From:	Diana Aventina <a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=114176113185158237169037163101249089000144044067209130152" >diana_aventina@--------</a>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 11:47:23 -0800 (PST)

Hi Graecus,
I am posting this t the list, because maybe someone else is
interested.
Sorry that it has taken me so long to get back to you. I
had "snailmailed" someone who has a lot of info (he went to
the site) but he has not yet replied. But I have just
discovered an article about it in a Flemish magazine which
was written by a good friend of mine. He has an email and
so I will ask him for further info.

This is what I read in the article:
In August, a Temple to Mithras was found in the Flemish
(Belgium) town of Tienen. In the Temple, the following
items were discovered: a bronze snake, 73 earthenware
goblets, chicken bones (dioxine free), a huge terracota
bowl, a cauldron (I don't what it is made of) and a wall
plaque that says "to the Conquered God Mithras" .
(I want to find out what the exact latin text reads--I am
translating this into English from Dutch and the Dutch is
a translation of the Latin....).

I believe that the artifacts were taken to Tongeren, which
has a large Gallo-Roman museum, built next to Roman walls.
Bright Blessings,
Diana
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: <a href="http://shopping.yahoo.com" target="_top" >http://shopping.yahoo.com</a>

Subject:	English Usage
From:	<a href="/post/novaroma?protectID=045232113165042200148200112241225012177026038196249130152150" >jmath669642reng@--------</a> (James Mathe--------/td>
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 19:57:37 -0500 (EST)

Salve, L.A. Laurentius;

Sir, I do not believe that anyone has impuned your ability at English.
You do very well, and I personnally am very pleased that you take such
efforts by and for NR as you do. You make your points strongly, and you
bring new ideas to the forum, and those attributes are valuable in this
micronation.

I must say, however, that the way you use your English and your repeated
general condemnation of the past leadership of NR is both erroneus and
unfair as well as unproductive to either the micronation or to yourself.
I remove myself from this discussion because I have rightly been accused
of mistakes and so cannot stand perhaps so straight as those that I
would defend, but the past magistrates collectively have done a
excellent job in their related tasks overall, and accusations of poor
and incompetant goverment from a person who has had little prior
involvement in the governing and the tough decision making of this
micronation is in my view most reprehensible, as well as being
undermining to the past effort having been spent here. It is quite one
thing to attack without fear of retaliation a person for what you see as
an error, but quite another to carry on the daily business of government
trying to determine and support policies of the majority while defending
the views of the minority. All this under the burden of a constant
stream of abuse which has little basis in fact.

As I have said, your wholesome comments are welome here as are your
ideas and your efforts, but I would ask that you be more specific and
accurate in your accusations and insults, or keep your own counsel until
you are able to be so. Perhaps the experience that you so hate to hear
about, and obviously lack, would give you a better insight about how to
institute change than the continuous insulting of men and women who are
devoting thier energies to the governing of this nation in whose forum
you have the privelege to speak.

Vale;
Marcus Minucius Audens

Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!

Subject:	[Nova Roma]The Nova Roma Website
From:
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 21:33:01 EST

Salve,

I have only become a citizen of Nova Roma recently. As I am excited in the
future and immediate potential of Nova Roma I would appreciate advice on how
to become an active member in government, politics, and religion. Also I
have noticed that a number of pages and graphics on the Nova Roma website are
not functioning properly or have yet to be set up, I currently operate a few
modest websites and I would be glad to aid in work on the website. Please
contact me if there is a way or someone I can contact to help work on
www.novaroma.org.

Vale,

Iulius Thompsonus

Post Scriptum:
I would appreciate input on a website that I have recently begun work on <A
HREF="<a href="http://members.xoom.com/RomaImperia/RomaImperia/index.html">Roman" target="_top" >http://members.xoom.com/RomaImperia/RomaImperia/index.html">Roman</a>
History</A> .


Faber est suae quisque fortunae.

Subject:	Re: [Nova Roma]The Nova Roma Website
From:
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 1999 18:39:50 -0800

Salve!

You ca------------------------mail to <a href="/post/--------roma?protectID=123056091213158116025056228219114090071048139" >germa--------s@--------</a> he is i--------arge of the
website and he would be able to make that decision. Thank you for wanting
to help out Nova Roma.

L. Cornelius Sulla
Consul
----- Original Message -----
From: <--------ef="/post/nov----------------otectID=246243113180119209184102159248147208071048" >St--------eck@--------</--------;
To: <a href="mailto:novaroma@--------" >novaroma@--------</a>
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 6:33 PM
Subject: [novaroma] [Nova Roma]The Nova Roma Website


> From: <--------ef="/post/nov----------------otectID=246243113180119209184102159248147208071048" >St--------eck@--------</--------;
>
> Salve,
>
> I have only become a citizen of Nova Roma recently. As I am excited in
the
> future and immediate potential of Nova Roma I would appreciate advice on
how
> to become an active member in government, politics, and religion. Also I
> have noticed that a number of pages and graphics on the Nova Roma website
are
> not functioning properly or have yet to be set up, I currently operate a
few
> modest websites and I would be glad to aid in work on the website. Please
> contact me if there is a way or someone I can contact to help work on
> www.novaroma.org.
>
> Vale,
>
> Iulius Thompsonus
>
> Post Scriptum:
> I would appreciate input on a website that I have recently begun work on
<A
> HREF="<a href="http://members.xoom.com/RomaImperia/RomaImperia/index.html">Roman" target="_top" >http://members.xoom.com/RomaImperia/RomaImperia/index.html">Roman</a>
> History</A> .
>
>
> Faber est suae quisque fortunae.
>
> >