| Subject: |
[novaroma] RE: For the Record |
| From: |
"JusticeCMO" <justicecmo@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:54:03 -0400 |
|
Salve,
Here is the short answer. Limitanus accused myself, and by extension my
scriba Pompeia, of censorship because he apparently had been trying to post
to this List and not seeing his posts appear. The list of "bounces" I posted
constitutes proof that Limitanus is having technical trouble, and that we
are *not* in any way censoring him. His posts are not even making it as far
as the pending file *for* us to reject even should we wish to.
Far from his cries of censorship, he is simply suffering the same e-mail
trouble he has been complaining of for a very long time. I posted the proof
of his troubles to counter his false accusation of censorship. Each
"bounce" represents a time he tried to post and his server timed out.
Unfortunately, he *still* lacks the dignitas to apologize as is due. No
matter, we all now know the truth of the matter. I do hope this clarifies
things for you. If not, please do not hesitate to contact me and I will be
happy to explain further.
Vale,
Priscilla Vedia Serena
Curatrix Sermonis
>>List Moderator Pricilla Vedia Serena;
Mistress, with respect and honor to all your efforts, could you please
explain in plain english just what your post regarding the the subject
item means.
I most apologize in advance for my lack of "techee language" but I have
little interest in the operation of the Interet except as a "super
pencil" and much of the technical language has as much understanding for
me as ancient sanscrit.
Please do not infer by this message that I in any way disagree with your
evaluation of the individual to which you have appealed, but I do wish
to understand exactly what your "bounce" post means.
In order to make my views clear, I would further ask that anyone who
cannot wait for Mistress Vedia to reply to my request, respectfully
restrain themselves until SHE has replied to my question. I feel it
necessary to mention the above as in the past there has always been
someone who interjects his comments before the person to whom I am
addressing the quesion can answer. As I consider this to be boorish,
pushey and undesirable, I would ask that Mistress Vedia Serena be
allowed the first crack at my very basic question. Thank you for your
consideration.
Respectfully;
Marcus Audens
Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!
http://community.webtv.net/jmath669642reng/NovaRomaMilitary
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
[novaroma] Re: Xtreme Xtians |
| From: |
"Lucius Sicinius Drusus" <lsicinius@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 05:51:45 -0000 |
|
Salvete,
I too have had some experances with these fanatics, and I can assure
you that they are some of the most hate filled people I've ever seen.
The best example is a radio sermon I heard one time where Adolf Hitler
was being called "The second greatest white man".
Other examples.
Jews being refered to as Christ killers.
Catholics are condemed for using Pagan Roman Rites.
The Pope is the Anti-christ.
Aids is Gods retribuation against Gays.
Blacks were marked with thier skin color as a punishment for an
ancestral crime against Noah.
The Roman Gods were Demons controlled by Satan.
I also would like to remind you that the last book of the Christian
Bible, Revalation, is full of hatred against Roma, portraying her as
the agent of Satan, and these people consider the Bible to be the
Literal truth. Once they learn of Nova Roma, I'm sure that we will be
painted as the agents of the Anti-Christ, who are preparing for his
rise to power by trying to revive Roma for him to rule.
To these Bigots destroying Nova Roma would be a Pius act.
Valete,
L. Sicinius Drusus
--- In novaroma@--------, "Sokarus Apollonius Callias" <hadescallias@h...>
wrote:
> i'm affraid i have to support his claim. i now a few christians who
join a club with the intention of spreading Gods word and oppressing
their faith on others. for a story i did some research for demons and
joined some demonology clubs and one of these members joined purely to
convince others to follow his path and he goes by the id of warrior
angel of god
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> Van: ksterne@--------
> Aan: novaroma@--------
> Verzonden: woensdag 20 juni 2001 16:30
> Onderwerp: [novaroma] Xtreme Xtians
>
>
> >>Frankly, I find the cautious talking about a possible lawsuit from
> extreme christians a bit silly<<
>
> Salve Sexte Apolloni,
>
> You need to vist us here in Tennessee, USA and you would not see the
> possibility as so remote. ;-) Some of these people are completely
> over the edge.
>
> Vale,
> Gaius Popillius Laenas
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> Click for Details
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
Re: [novaroma] Re: Xtreme Xtians |
| From: |
Gnaeus Salix Astur <salixastur@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 04:17:35 -0700 (PDT) |
|
Salvete omnes.
A good way to protect ourselves from this danger could be by having a
higher European presence. These groups are either non-existant or hold
very little power over here, so if we declared Nova Roma as a
non-profit organization in, let's say, the Netherlands (in addition to
Maine), we could even get protection from these groups.
--- Lucius Sicinius Drusus <lsicinius@--------> wrote:
> Salvete,
>
> I too have had some experances with these fanatics, and I can assure
> you that they are some of the most hate filled people I've ever seen.
>
> The best example is a radio sermon I heard one time where Adolf
> Hitler
> was being called "The second greatest white man".
>
> Other examples.
>
> Jews being refered to as Christ killers.
> Catholics are condemed for using Pagan Roman Rites.
> The Pope is the Anti-christ.
> Aids is Gods retribuation against Gays.
> Blacks were marked with thier skin color as a punishment for an
> ancestral crime against Noah.
> The Roman Gods were Demons controlled by Satan.
>
> I also would like to remind you that the last book of the Christian
> Bible, Revalation, is full of hatred against Roma, portraying her as
> the agent of Satan, and these people consider the Bible to be the
> Literal truth. Once they learn of Nova Roma, I'm sure that we will be
> painted as the agents of the Anti-Christ, who are preparing for his
> rise to power by trying to revive Roma for him to rule.
>
> To these Bigots destroying Nova Roma would be a Pius act.
>
> Valete,
> L. Sicinius Drusus
=====
Bene Valete in Pace Deorum!
Gnaeus Salix Astur.
Scriba ad Res Externas Academiae Thules.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
[novaroma] Re: Xtreme Xtians |
| From: |
"Lucius Sicinius Drusus" <lsicinius@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:24:15 -0000 |
|
--- In novaroma@--------, Gnaeus Salix Astur <salixastur@--------> wrote:
> Salvete omnes.
>
> A good way to protect ourselves from this danger could be by having a
> higher European presence. These groups are either non-existant or hold
> very little power over here, so if we declared Nova Roma as a
> non-profit organization in, let's say, the Netherlands (in addition to
> Maine), we could even get protection from these groups.
>
SNIP
> Bene Valete in Pace Deorum!
> Gnaeus Salix Astur.
> Scriba ad Res Externas Academiae Thules.
Salve,
Incorparating Nova Roma in A European nation is something that I
favor, and not just to protect her from the fanatics. We have over 230
citizens who reside in Europe or about a quater of Nova Roma. Since
Europe has a larger population than the USA, I feel that one day there
will be more European Nova Romans than American Nova Romans, so it is
only logical to take this step for our future.
Having part of our treasury in Europe under a European incorparated
Nova Roma would protect this portion from any lawsuit. It would also
allow us to collect taxes from our European citizens in Euros making
it easier for our European Civies to pay them, and avoid the cost of
exchange fees when we have European expenses.
I Realize that the Senate is leery of having funds outside the USA
after the incident in Britannia. As long as Nova Roma Europa had the
same Board of Directers (Senate) as Nova Roma USA, the Senate would
retain full control of the European treasury, and it wouldn't require
the Senators presecance in Europe any more than being incorparated in
Maine requires the Senate to live in that state.
Vale,
L. Sicinius Drusus
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
[novaroma] Digest No 1490 RE: For the Record |
| From: |
"Lucius Equitius" <vze23hw7@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:33:39 -0400 |
|
Ex Domo Lucius Equitius Quiritibus et Curatrix Sermoni SPD
Maybe Limitanus cannot post an apology due to his 'having technical
trouble'?
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 16
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:54:03 -0400
From: "JusticeCMO" <justicecmo@-------->
Subject: RE: For the Record
Salve,
Here is the short answer. Limitanus accused myself, and by extension my
scriba Pompeia, of censorship because he apparently had been trying to post
to this List and not seeing his posts appear. The list of "bounces" I posted
constitutes proof that Limitanus is having technical trouble, and that we
are *not* in any way censoring him. His posts are not even making it as far
as the pending file *for* us to reject even should we wish to.
Far from his cries of censorship, he is simply suffering the same e-mail
trouble he has been complaining of for a very long time. I posted the proof
of his troubles to counter his false accusation of censorship. Each
"bounce" represents a time he tried to post and his server timed out.
Unfortunately, he *still* lacks the dignitas to apologize as is due. No
matter, we all now know the truth of the matter. I do hope this clarifies
things for you. If not, please do not hesitate to contact me and I will be
happy to explain further.
Vale,
Priscilla Vedia Serena
Curatrix Sermonis
>>List Moderator Pricilla Vedia Serena;
Mistress, with respect and honor to all your efforts, could you please
explain in plain english just what your post regarding the the subject
item means.
I most apologize in advance for my lack of "techee language" but I have
little interest in the operation of the Interet except as a "super
pencil" and much of the technical language has as much understanding for
me as ancient sanscrit.
Please do not infer by this message that I in any way disagree with your
evaluation of the individual to which you have appealed, but I do wish
to understand exactly what your "bounce" post means.
In order to make my views clear, I would further ask that anyone who
cannot wait for Mistress Vedia to reply to my request, respectfully
restrain themselves until SHE has replied to my question. I feel it
necessary to mention the above as in the past there has always been
someone who interjects his comments before the person to whom I am
addressing the quesion can answer. As I consider this to be boorish,
pushey and undesirable, I would ask that Mistress Vedia Serena be
allowed the first crack at my very basic question. Thank you for your
consideration.
Respectfully;
Marcus Audens
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
[novaroma] Reminder: Vindolanda Fund |
| From: |
pcassia@-------- |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:57:22 -0000 |
|
I come before you to remind the Citizens of Nova Roma that our nation
is organizing a relief effort for the Roman site at Vindolanda in
northern Britain.
This site, managed by a private trust, has contributed a great deal to
our knowledge and understanding of Roman provincial life. This year the
visitors who provide much of its revenue have been scared away by the
foot-and-mouth epidemic, and help is needed for valuable archaeological
work to continue.
Please visit http://www.novaroma.org/aerarium_saturni/vindolanda/ to
learn more and make your contribution as soon as possible by mail or
PayPal.
I have asked the Senate to appropriate some of its discretionary funds
to this cause, and hope to convey the money to the Vindolanda Trust as
soon as that is approved.
Patricia Cassia
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
[novaroma] "Bounces" |
| From: |
jmath669642reng@-------- |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:32:12 -0400 (EDT) |
|
Curatix Sermonis Priscilla Vedia Serena;
I thank you Mistress for your very kind and clearr explanation of the
"Bounce" Report. Now that I understad the situation more fully, as a
elected Magistrate, I to call for the apology from Limitus to both of
these hard-working members of Nova Roma. The duties taken up by both,
are a very necssary adjunct to the Main List, and have, in my humble
opinion, been well and fairly carried out since they have "taken up the
gage" so to speak.
They have in my opinion, dealt very well with some of the more extreme
opinions of some of our NR Citizens, and have endured some very
uncivilized accusations and comments as a "reward" for that work.
I have never had even the smallest problem with either of these ladies
in any of my dealings with them, and they have always been most
agreeable in aceding to any reasonable request of mine to improve the
list. However, I make it a point not to berate them, insult them or
overwhelm them with a demanded policy which will not benefit all of Nova
Roma, nor do I call them vile names, and I try in my humble way to treat
both with the respect and dignity that I myself would want to recieve.
It may just possibly be that the immediate above is some very small
reason for my successes in this part of Nova Roma!!!!!!!!!!!
Therefore I earnestly call for those who have insulted, harrassed, or
disagreed with these ladies and their significant efforts for NR, to
render to them the apologies they deserve, and / or to come to some
reasonable concurrence with them regarding your problems. In closing, I
would say, my friends, that you should be very glad that, this task has
not been regulated to myself, for I have little patience or few good
words for those who trespass into insult, innuendo, and / or the
disruption of this list for personal of factional gain.
Respectfully;
Marcus Minucius Audens
ProConsul and Magistrate
Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!
http://community.webtv.net/jmath669642reng/NovaRomaMilitary
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
Re: [novaroma] RE: For the Record |
| From: |
Michel Loos <loos@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:03:49 -0300 |
|
JusticeCMO wrote:
>
> Salve,
>
> Here is the short answer. Limitanus accused myself, and by extension my
> scriba Pompeia, of censorship because he apparently had been trying to post
> to this List and not seeing his posts appear. The list of "bounces" I posted
> constitutes proof that Limitanus is having technical trouble, and that we
> are *not* in any way censoring him. His posts are not even making it as far
> as the pending file *for* us to reject even should we wish to.
Salve,
another lie from out List Mistress: this bounces proff the faulty
brehaviour of Yahoo groups while sending mail. This has absolutely
nothing to do with me sendiong mail,
those are two totally different processes.
>
> Far from his cries of censorship, he is simply suffering the same e-mail
> trouble he has been complaining of for a very long time. I posted the proof
> of his troubles to counter his false accusation of censorship. Each
> "bounce" represents a time he tried to post and his server timed out.
>
I have troubles for receiving NOT for sending.
Vale,
Manius Villius Limitanus
> Unfortunately, he *still* lacks the dignitas to apologize as is due. No
> matter, we all now know the truth of the matter. I do hope this clarifies
> things for you. If not, please do not hesitate to contact me and I will be
> happy to explain further.
>
> Vale,
> Priscilla Vedia Serena
> Curatrix Sermonis
>
> >>List Moderator Pricilla Vedia Serena;
>
> Mistress, with respect and honor to all your efforts, could you please
> explain in plain english just what your post regarding the the subject
> item means.
>
> I most apologize in advance for my lack of "techee language" but I have
> little interest in the operation of the Interet except as a "super
> pencil" and much of the technical language has as much understanding for
> me as ancient sanscrit.
>
> Please do not infer by this message that I in any way disagree with your
> evaluation of the individual to which you have appealed, but I do wish
> to understand exactly what your "bounce" post means.
>
> In order to make my views clear, I would further ask that anyone who
> cannot wait for Mistress Vedia to reply to my request, respectfully
> restrain themselves until SHE has replied to my question. I feel it
> necessary to mention the above as in the past there has always been
> someone who interjects his comments before the person to whom I am
> addressing the quesion can answer. As I consider this to be boorish,
> pushey and undesirable, I would ask that Mistress Vedia Serena be
> allowed the first crack at my very basic question. Thank you for your
> consideration.
>
> Respectfully;
> Marcus Audens
>
> Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!
>
> http://community.webtv.net/jmath669642reng/NovaRomaMilitary
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
RE: [novaroma] Digest No 1490 RE: For the Record |
| From: |
"JusticeCMO" <justicecmo@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:29:15 -0400 |
|
Salve,
>>Ex Domo Lucius Equitius Quiritibus et Curatrix Sermoni SPD
Maybe Limitanus cannot post an apology due to his 'having technical
trouble'?>>
I am afraid not. He has been quite able to send mail these past few days,
none of which even admit that he was in error, let alone apologizing.
Unfortunately he seems to be fine with making false accusations and taking
no responsibility for them. The truth seems to hold little interest to him.
Be that as it may, your point is a good one, but regrettably not the case.
Limitanus is not owning up to his mistake by choice, and what appears to be
a healthy dose of contempt for me personally. As I have said, now that the
truth has come out, his choices are his own and reflect on *his* character
and dignitas, not on me.
Vale,
Priscilla Vedia Serena
Curatrix Sermonis
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
RE: [novaroma] RE: For the Record |
| From: |
"JusticeCMO" <justicecmo@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 12:47:30 -0400 |
|
Salve Limitanus,
>>another lie from out List Mistress:>>
Oh wonderful, *another* unfounded accusation. What exactly was the "first"
lie? ::shaking head::
>>this bounces proff the faulty brehaviour of Yahoo groups while sending
mail. This has absolutely nothing to do with me sendiong mail,those are two
totally different processes.>>
Unless you use different servers for sending and receiving mail, the error
message: "'Mail server for "qt1.iq.usp.br" unreachable for too long'"
clearly indicate that the problem lies with your mail server. It follows
logically that, as you are having technical problems, the lack of your posts
appearing on the ML has *NOTHING* to do with censorship and *EVERYTHING* to
do with *your* technical troubles. <caps for emphasis, not shouting>
>>I have troubles for receiving NOT for sending.>>
Again, unless you are using different servers to send and receive, you are
having problems across the board. I am baffled by your utter refusal to
acknowledge the technical trouble and recognize that your server and yahoo
are the source of your "missing" posts, not any censorship as you have
alleged.
I still await your apology, although I am afraid you will never have the
dignitas to do so. Hopefully you will prove me wrong.
Vale,
Priscilla Vedia Serena
Curatrix Sermonis
Vale,
Manius Villius Limitanus
> Unfortunately, he *still* lacks the dignitas to apologize as is due. No
> matter, we all now know the truth of the matter. I do hope this clarifies
> things for you. If not, please do not hesitate to contact me and I will
be
> happy to explain further.
>
> Vale,
> Priscilla Vedia Serena
> Curatrix Sermonis
>
> >>List Moderator Pricilla Vedia Serena;
>
> Mistress, with respect and honor to all your efforts, could you please
> explain in plain english just what your post regarding the the subject
> item means.
>
> I most apologize in advance for my lack of "techee language" but I have
> little interest in the operation of the Interet except as a "super
> pencil" and much of the technical language has as much understanding for
> me as ancient sanscrit.
>
> Please do not infer by this message that I in any way disagree with your
> evaluation of the individual to which you have appealed, but I do wish
> to understand exactly what your "bounce" post means.
>
> In order to make my views clear, I would further ask that anyone who
> cannot wait for Mistress Vedia to reply to my request, respectfully
> restrain themselves until SHE has replied to my question. I feel it
> necessary to mention the above as in the past there has always been
> someone who interjects his comments before the person to whom I am
> addressing the quesion can answer. As I consider this to be boorish,
> pushey and undesirable, I would ask that Mistress Vedia Serena be
> allowed the first crack at my very basic question. Thank you for your
> consideration.
>
> Respectfully;
> Marcus Audens
>
> Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!
>
> http://community.webtv.net/jmath669642reng/NovaRomaMilitary
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
[novaroma] Fwd: [NovaromaVizantia] Mainlist "Censorship" |
| From: |
"Pompeia Cornelia" <trog99@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:19:04 -0400 |
|
Salvete Civites Nova Roma:
I just responded to the Vizantia List regarding Limitanus' continued
accusations of Censorship by Curatrix Sermonen Priscilla Vedia Serena.
Although I do not feel at liberty to crosspost Limitanus' Vizantia
literature here, I am completely comfortable in crossposting my response.
I grow very weary of the *guilty until proven destined for deification*
policy of Limitanus. I am very weary of the contined harassment of
Limitanus against Vedia.
Could we please stop this, Limitanus? Praetors et Censors, does this lady
have to put up with this string of harassment and maltreatment for the
remainder of her term?
My comments to Vizantia below.
Valete,
Pompeia Cornelia
Scriba Curatrix Sermonen,
Propraetrix pro tem Canada Orientalis
NOVA ROMA
>From: "Pompeia Cornelia" <trog99@-------->
>Reply-To: NovaromaVizantia@--------
>To: Novaromavizantia@--------
>Subject: [NovaromaVizantia] Mainlist "Censorship"
>Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:58:51 -0400
>
>Salvete Limitanus et Populus Nova Roma Vizantia:
>
>You still do not present with any undisputed truth that Curatrix Priscilla
>Vedia is censoring your posts, due to personal political agreement on her
>part.
>
>The post which did not appear in the forum earlier in the week was not
>received as a pending message by myself, either. It was *not* censored.
>Priscilla and myself cannot send to the list what we do not receive. Why
>we
>didn't receive it (both of us) I do not know, but it was not the fault of
>us. You are having email trouble, we did not receive your post. I am not
>a
>liar. Somewhere, something went wrong, but this in no way proves that
>Priscilla Vedia is manipulating the mainlist mail, to serve her own whims.
>
>You forwarded a series of posts to this list a little while ago, today. In
>one of these posts you state that you are not convinced as to her
>innocence
>as yet, and therefore will abstain from an apology until you are so
>"convinced". This, Limitane,is the most bogus sense of justice I have ever
>heard of.
>
>What you are in effect saying, is that Vedia is guilty until proven
>completely innocent. And you are not even entertaining the concept of
>"reasonable doubt".
>
>Regarding yesterday's post to the forum, your post was not allowed, not
>because Vedia is playing games with you, but because your tag line calls
>for
>inciting the removal, impeachment, demise, whatever of the Consul of Nova
>Roma. I don't care if the consul is married to Vedia or if he's married to
>Nicole Kidman, this type of literature is clearly against list guidelines.
>They are in the files section of the mainlist Yahoo page. Read them,
>please.
>
>So, be sure to tell Nova Roma Vizantia *all* of the truth, and not just
>what you want them to hear.
>
>I am sorry that Vizantia community is being dragged into this Kangaroo
>Court
>of Limitanus' relentless harassment of Priscilla Vedia Serena over,
>basically "one" post which didn't appear.
>
>Rather than question the Curatrix privately about why the post was omitted,
>he has chosen to accuse her publically, and moreover, condemn her unless he
>is completely convinced of her innocence.
>
>This, in my estimation is a very narly way to treat another person.
>
>You are quick to accuse Vedia of not liking you and mistreating you...well
>frankly, I do not like the callous and unfair manner in which you are
>treating her. You are putting this lady through the wringer over *one
>post*......??? *Who* is treating *whom* unfairly now?
>
>Bene valete,
>Pompeia Cornelia Strabo
>Scriba Curatrix Sermonen
>Propraetrix pro tem Canada Orientalis
>NOVA ROMA
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
Re: [novaroma] Re: Xtreme Xtians |
| From: |
Gnaeus Salix Astur <salixastur@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:37:00 -0700 (PDT) |
|
Salve, honorabilis L. Sicini Druse.
Once again, your statements are well founded and well thought. I
completely support them (you should try to make a mistake here or
there; I am tired of writing this words again and again ;-) ).
Thank you for your wise suggestions. I hope our senatores take good
note of them.
--- Lucius Sicinius Drusus <lsicinius@--------> wrote:
> --- In novaroma@--------, Gnaeus Salix Astur <salixastur@--------> wrote:
> > Salvete omnes.
> >
> > A good way to protect ourselves from this danger could be by having
> a
> > higher European presence. These groups are either non-existant or
> hold
> > very little power over here, so if we declared Nova Roma as a
> > non-profit organization in, let's say, the Netherlands (in addition
> to
> > Maine), we could even get protection from these groups.
> >
> SNIP
> > Bene Valete in Pace Deorum!
> > Gnaeus Salix Astur.
> > Scriba ad Res Externas Academiae Thules.
>
> Salve,
>
> Incorparating Nova Roma in A European nation is something that I
> favor, and not just to protect her from the fanatics. We have over
> 230
> citizens who reside in Europe or about a quater of Nova Roma. Since
> Europe has a larger population than the USA, I feel that one day
> there
> will be more European Nova Romans than American Nova Romans, so it is
> only logical to take this step for our future.
>
> Having part of our treasury in Europe under a European incorparated
> Nova Roma would protect this portion from any lawsuit. It would also
> allow us to collect taxes from our European citizens in Euros making
> it easier for our European Civies to pay them, and avoid the cost of
> exchange fees when we have European expenses.
>
> I Realize that the Senate is leery of having funds outside the USA
> after the incident in Britannia. As long as Nova Roma Europa had the
> same Board of Directers (Senate) as Nova Roma USA, the Senate would
> retain full control of the European treasury, and it wouldn't require
> the Senators presecance in Europe any more than being incorparated in
> Maine requires the Senate to live in that state.
>
> Vale,
> L. Sicinius Drusus
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
=====
Bene Valete in Pace Deorum!
Gnaeus Salix Astur.
Scriba ad Res Externas Academiae Thules.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
[novaroma] Why is it that... |
| From: |
gcassiusnerva@-------- |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:52:09 -0000 |
|
My brother in law is kind enough to let me check my email on his
machine while mine is unavailable.
Why is it that the name Limitanus ends with the word 'anus'? Is there
something symbolic here?
Nerva
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
Re: [novaroma] RE: For the Record |
| From: |
Michel Loos <loos@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:32:55 -0300 |
|
JusticeCMO wrote:
>
> Salve Limitanus,
>
> >>another lie from out List Mistress:>>
>
> Oh wonderful, *another* unfounded accusation. What exactly was the "first"
> lie? ::shaking head::
>
> >>this bounces proff the faulty brehaviour of Yahoo groups while sending
> mail. This has absolutely nothing to do with me sendiong mail,those are two
> totally different processes.>>
>
> Unless you use different servers for sending and receiving mail, the error
> message: "'Mail server for "qt1.iq.usp.br" unreachable for too long'"
> clearly indicate that the problem lies with your mail server. It follows
> logically that, as you are having technical problems, the lack of your posts
> appearing on the ML has *NOTHING* to do with censorship and *EVERYTHING* to
> do with *your* technical troubles. <caps for emphasis, not shouting>
>
If you check my headers you will see that in fact the SMTP server is not
qt1.iq.usp.br.
As I explained numerous times the mails are driped on the IMAP server
because yahoo fails to provide unique mail IDs, meaning that different
mails reach the mail server with the same ID and consequently are
dropped by deliver.
Since they are dropped no ACK is send to yahoo and for yahoo it appears
that the mail server was not reached.
The mail you claim you never received is the only I have ever heard of
that did not reach its destinary, and as I said I send some 30-50 mails
a day.
elementary knowledge of mail servers can show this to you.
Vale
Manius Villius Limitanus.
> >>I have troubles for receiving NOT for sending.>>
>
> Again, unless you are using different servers to send and receive, you are
> having problems across the board. I am baffled by your utter refusal to
> acknowledge the technical trouble and recognize that your server and yahoo
> are the source of your "missing" posts, not any censorship as you have
> alleged.
>
> I still await your apology, although I am afraid you will never have the
> dignitas to do so. Hopefully you will prove me wrong.
>
> Vale,
> Priscilla Vedia Serena
> Curatrix Sermonis
>
> Vale,
>
> Manius Villius Limitanus
>
> > Unfortunately, he *still* lacks the dignitas to apologize as is due. No
> > matter, we all now know the truth of the matter. I do hope this clarifies
> > things for you. If not, please do not hesitate to contact me and I will
> be
> > happy to explain further.
> >
> > Vale,
> > Priscilla Vedia Serena
> > Curatrix Sermonis
> >
> > >>List Moderator Pricilla Vedia Serena;
> >
> > Mistress, with respect and honor to all your efforts, could you please
> > explain in plain english just what your post regarding the the subject
> > item means.
> >
> > I most apologize in advance for my lack of "techee language" but I have
> > little interest in the operation of the Interet except as a "super
> > pencil" and much of the technical language has as much understanding for
> > me as ancient sanscrit.
> >
> > Please do not infer by this message that I in any way disagree with your
> > evaluation of the individual to which you have appealed, but I do wish
> > to understand exactly what your "bounce" post means.
> >
> > In order to make my views clear, I would further ask that anyone who
> > cannot wait for Mistress Vedia to reply to my request, respectfully
> > restrain themselves until SHE has replied to my question. I feel it
> > necessary to mention the above as in the past there has always been
> > someone who interjects his comments before the person to whom I am
> > addressing the quesion can answer. As I consider this to be boorish,
> > pushey and undesirable, I would ask that Mistress Vedia Serena be
> > allowed the first crack at my very basic question. Thank you for your
> > consideration.
> >
> > Respectfully;
> > Marcus Audens
> >
> > Fair Winds and Following Seas!!!
> >
> > http://community.webtv.net/jmath669642reng/NovaRomaMilitary
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
[novaroma] Re: For the Record |
| From: |
Kristoffer From <from@--------> |
| Date: |
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:03:18 +0200 |
|
Salvete Priscilla Vedia Serena, Mani Villi Limitane et omnes.
I apologize if I'm interfering in a situation in which I'm not involved,
but this entire situation feels as though it's mostly a matter of
technical difficulties, not deliberate actions on anyone's behalf. To
recap the story thus far:
Limitanus is modified by Vedia, reason known to them both.
Limitanus posts to the main list, an action which he knows Vedia must
approve, and the post never arrives. This I believe he has proved.
Limitanus comes to the conclusion that the post has been moderated,
since it contained some harsh words meant for Vedia's husband.
Vedia never sees this post, and is unaware of it ever existing.
Limitanus posts again, this time informing the list of the perceived
wrongdoing.
An argument erupts, in which both parties plead innocence.
Now, as far as I understand, the main question to be asked is, what
happened to Limitanus' original post? Since it was delivered by his
server, but never sent to Vedia for approval, doesn't it sound likely
that the fault may lie within our list provider, Yahoo?
Just my thoughts, I'm not out to offend anyone.
Valete,
Titus Octavius Pius,
Consiliarius Thules,
Praeco Anarei Thules,
Scriba to the Curator Araneum
AKA Kristoffer From
---
Si hoc signum legere potes,
operis boni in rebus latinis alacribus
et fructuosis potiri potes.
- Not-so-famous quotation
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d- s:++> a-- C++>$ ULS++ P+ L++ E- W++(--) N
o-- K- w--- !O M-- V-- PS->$ PE- Y+ PGP- t+@ 5- X-
R+++>$ !tv- b+++>$ DI++++ D+ G e h! !r-->r+++ !x-
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
Re: [novaroma] Why is it that... |
| From: |
=?iso-8859-1?q?Marcos=20Boehme?= <marminius@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:47:20 -0300 (ART) |
|
Salvete, Quirites
Nerva, your intervention here is far from oportune.
Can you, please, abstain from this type of posting?
Here is the main list, not the back alley.
Marcus Arminius Maior
--- gcassiusnerva@-------- escreveu: > My brother in law
is kind enough to let me check my
> email on his
> machine while mine is unavailable.
>
> Why is it that the name Limitanus ends with the word
> 'anus'? Is there
> something symbolic here?
>
> Nerva
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! GeoCities
Tenha seu lugar na Web. Construa hoje mesmo sua home page no Yahoo! GeoCites. É fácil e grátis!
http://br.geocities.yahoo.com/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
[novaroma] censorship |
| From: |
Carmen Pehnec <europamoon7@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:16:24 -0700 (PDT) |
|
Avete,
I have just joined this list and already find myself
embroiled in a dispute between two Nova Romans over
censorship of this list. This dispute seems to have
become personal to me and should be handled by a
committee that oversees this list or individuals of
higher authority. If there are no such individuals or
committee then there should be one. This issue could
go on indefinitely and apparently has already become a
burden to those participating in this group. I
suggest this matter be handled off the list and the
resolution along with the original circumstances then
posted for all to read.
Valete,
Pompeia Antonia Caesar
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| Subject: |
[novaroma] Salve Pompeia Antonia :) |
| From: |
"Pompeia Cornelia" <scriba_forum@--------> |
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:53:44 -0000 |
|
Salve et Welcome Pompeia!
Nice to see another Pompeia in Nova Roma :)!!
I don't recall seeing your name on the list before. So, if you have posted
in the past and I haven't been on line to see, please excuse me.
Be well!
Pompeia Cornelia
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
