Subject:	[novaroma] Re: Call for Candidates for Tribuni Plebis and Aedilis Plebeius
From:	"arloro1" <antoniuscorvusseptimius@yahoo.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 Feb 2002 00:30:27 -0000

Antonius Corvus Septimius Publicus Polopli Nova Romanii SF

I am very pleased to announce my candidacy for Tribunus Plebis.
As Tribunus, I will take the oath that is required of me. And an oath
to the people of Nova Roma. Which is my honor to show the dedication
that I have for my fellow Plebs.
I humbly await any questions. And would be happy to answer
them.
Dii te ament

Subject:	RE: [novaroma] Revision - Lex Cornelia de Tabulis Gentium Novaromanarum Agendis
From:	"JusticeCMO" <justicecmo@goldenfuture.net>
Date:	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 19:39:48 -0500

Salve,

I have a quick question. In regards to the following section of the
proposal:

> X. During the period of time when there is no paterfamilias in the
> Gens, the Gens will remain static. No new admissions may take place.
> Nor can there be any individual leave the Gens until a new paterfamilias
> is selected.>>

Is there any current lex that states that a member of a gens *cannot* leave
their gens of their own free will? I understand there may be some genses
<sp?> that do things this way and I also understand that it may be customary
and historical. What I am curious about is whether this is a law or not.

Thanks in advance!

Vale,
Priscilla Vedia Serena
Curatrix Sermonis
Lictor

Subject:	Re: [novaroma] Call for Candidates for Tribuni Plebis and Aedilis
From:	Michel Loos <loos@qt1.iq.usp.br>
Date:	05 Feb 2002 22:46:58 -0200

Salvete,

I announce hereby my intention to candidate for Tribunus Plebis.

I intend to defend everywhere and always the freedom of all Roman
Citizens be they Plebeian or Patrician.

In collaboration with the other tribunes I intend to elaborate and
propose to you laws that explicit the freedom granted to all citizens,
specially the freedom of speech.

Valete,

Manius Villius Limitanus.

Subject:	Re: [novaroma] Revision - Lex Cornelia de Tabulis Gentium Novaromanarum Agendis
From:	"L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@earthlink.net>
Date:	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:05:08 -0800

----- Original Message -----
From: JusticeCMO
To: novaroma@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:39 PM
Subject: RE: [novaroma] Revision - Lex Cornelia de Tabulis Gentium Novaromanarum Agendis


Salve,

Ave Priscilla Vedia et al,

I have a quick question. In regards to the following section of the
proposal:

> X. During the period of time when there is no paterfamilias in the
> Gens, the Gens will remain static. No new admissions may take place.
> Nor can there be any individual leave the Gens until a new paterfamilias
> is selected.>>

Is there any current lex that states that a member of a gens *cannot* leave
their gens of their own free will?

Sulla: No. There is no current law. However, I know that the Praetors are working on some adoption procedures.

I understand there may be some genses
<sp?> that do things this way and I also understand that it may be customary
and historical. What I am curious about is whether this is a law or not.

Sulla: Yes it is both customary and historical. Being apart of a gens is being apart of a family. I dont think it should be so easy to break up a family. However, I am currently working on a compromise with Tribune Salix that would satisfy his reservation regarding the limitation of citizens being allowed to leave the gens if a paterfamilias has not been accepted. So, to answer your final question, this is not a law yet. I have proposed it to the People of Nova Roma to discuss. In the next two weeks the Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Populi will be summoned and the final revision of this law will be put up for a vote.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
Consul

Thanks in advance!

Vale,
Priscilla Vedia Serena
Curatrix Sermonis
Lictor

Subject:	[novaroma] Re: Praetor's Thoughts - Lex Cornelia de Tabulis Gentium Novaromanarum Agendis
From:	"pompeia_cornelia" <trog99@hotmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 Feb 2002 03:50:52 -0000

---Salvete Omnes:

Some thoughts based on my recent reading, with respect to the
legislation.

First off, I like the idea of insisting on some accountability and a
small degree of activity from our familia heads. Even today, we
register ourselves and our families, macronationally. I don't have a
problem with registration at all. However, there are some concerns
about possible contravention of existing rights as spelled out in our
own consitution, particularily when it comes to what to do with the
resultant 'foundlings' of a nonregistered pater. After considering
all that I have read from various parties, I offer the following
comments.

Just to augment the discussion a bit between Priscilla and Consul
Sulla....In antiquita, upon death, the Paterfamiliasship and
concommitant patriaprotestas was automatically bestowed on the next
eldest familia member....(well, son back then)

In our res publica, this eligible individual has really no
obligation, that I can see, to accept this position (although in
Republican Rome such would be unheard of, as a usual course).

To digress, there are examples of emancipation and manumission from
the Pater's powers, as well as adoption into another gens, if agreed
upon by the Pater. The details will be spelled out in the Praetoral
civil law code, which will deal with gens relationships. It wasn't
until the early principate that laws were instituted to protect the
filias from abuse. However, there are cases of a Praetor extending
monies to a filias written out of a will by his paterfamilias, in
republican Rome. So, in the absence of clear, cut legislation, the
respublica tried to make wrongs right in certain cases.


What I propose, with respect to this Registration lex, is that if
the next in line does not wish to be pater/mater, this opportunity is
passed on to the next in line. If nobody wants to be head of their
own familia, I would consider the gens in question, for all practical
purposes, without a headship, and without membership. The gens is
closed, and the name is fair game for future citizens. The filia
should be considered manumitted from the obligations of their gens
(familia) and former Pater/Mater, and are free to join another gens.
This way, every effort is made to preserve the gens, but when all
efforts are exhausted, the citizens in question may move on.




Mind you, the adoptees are subject to the rules of the Familia (gens)
they join.

Such citizens in limbo, so to speak, shall have the wardship of the
Pontifex Maxmimus (who presided over adoptions/manumissions and
emancipations, giving a religious recommendation as to whether the
actions in question were appropriate) Since the Praetors were
involved, they could be wards of the Praetors, or even the Comitia
Centuriata. I am not sure yet, in other words :)

Either way, by whatever body we choose above, we are stating that
their rights as citizens are protected under the consitution, for a
specified period of time, by the respublica, in the absence of
belonging to a gens, which is currently a constitutional must. In
other words, they are covered for say, a month, until they find a new
home. It cannot be assumed that it is the filias' fault that a
Pater/Mater has failed to uphold their responsibilities. *They were
the ones abandoned by the familia head)

I will also be producing a modified code of Patriaprotestas, for the
examination of my colleague, advisors and Senate. (believe me, you do
not want the unmodified version :)) I like the idea of the
Paterfamilias having headship in his gens, and if modified and well
detailed, I think this is a viable aspect of Antiquita Res publica
worth keeping.

Further, I will be working on a judicial means by which a famila
filius (filia) may apply for manumission/emancipation for reasons of
maltreatment or incompatibility within a gens. Although I do not
wish to see a flippant activity of musical gentes, I do feel that, on
occasion, there are serious problems which require the attention of
a tribunal, which, in antiquita, was often established by the
Paterfamilias. In Nova Roma, quite often the pater shall be the
defendant, and thusly cannot act as an impartial selector of
advisors. I believe the praetors should handle this. I would welcome
the Tribunes, perhaps one or two, to be on such a tribunal.

I would like to see such a tribunal accessible to Paters who are
entertaining the expulsion of one of their filiae.

The problem with getting comitia involved with gens problems is that
there is an obvious lack of privacy for any sensitive issues, plus
the religious observances make things a little slower to progress.

I hope this enlightens you as to where I am coming from, with respect
to the legislation in question, possible scenerios and amendments,
and what I am doing with respect to the Praetoral affairs.

Bene vale,
Pompeia Cornelia
Praetrix
Nova Roma

References: Introduction to Roman Law, Nicholas, Barry. Oxford
University Press, 1975, ISBN 0-19-876063-9

Crime And Community in Ciceronian Rome. Ribbsby, Andrew M. University
of Texas Press, 1999, ISBN 0-292-77099-5

Contained therein are texts from Cicero. Also Polybius and the
Twelve tables have been examined






In novaroma@y..., "L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@e...> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: JusticeCMO
> To: novaroma@y...
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:39 PM
> Subject: RE: [novaroma] Revision - Lex Cornelia de Tabulis
Gentium Novaromanarum Agendis
>
>
> Salve,
>
> Ave Priscilla Vedia et al,
>
> I have a quick question. In regards to the following section of
the
> proposal:
>
> > X. During the period of time when there is no paterfamilias in
the
> > Gens, the Gens will remain static. No new admissions may take
place.
> > Nor can there be any individual leave the Gens until a new
paterfamilias
> > is selected.>>
>
> Is there any current lex that states that a member of a gens
*cannot* leave
> their gens of their own free will?
>
> Sulla: No. There is no current law. However, I know that the
Praetors are working on some adoption procedures.
>
> I understand there may be some genses
> <sp?> that do things this way and I also understand that it may
be customary
> and historical. What I am curious about is whether this is a law
or not.
>
> Sulla: Yes it is both customary and historical. Being apart of
a gens is being apart of a family. I dont think it should be so easy
to break up a family. However, I am currently working on a
compromise with Tribune Salix that would satisfy his reservation
regarding the limitation of citizens being allowed to leave the gens
if a paterfamilias has not been accepted. So, to answer your final
question, this is not a law yet. I have proposed it to the People of
Nova Roma to discuss. In the next two weeks the Comitia Centuriata
and the Comitia Populi will be summoned and the final revision of
this law will be put up for a vote.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
> Consul
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Vale,
> Priscilla Vedia Serena
> Curatrix Sermonis
> Lictor
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Subject:	Re: [novaroma] Revision - Lex Cornelia de Tabulis Gentium Novaromanarum Agendis
From:	"Valerie Hartzer" <valsylph@yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:16:38 -0500

Salve Lucius Cornelius,

In regards to the Lex on Pater/Mater annual Registration, I think it is a wonderfully sensible law and I highly support it as it actually works to solve a problem, not seeking to flog everyone in Nova Roma for the errors of a few. However I have one question on it...what happens if a Mater/ Pater is going to be out of the country and therefore incommunicato during the period of Gens registration. Can they apply to register early so that they may maintain their Mater/Pater status? I will be out of the country May 11- 27, 2002 which is a large portion of the registration period. I have the worst timing for an anniversary sojurn to Italy and Greece!
But my personal problems aside I applaud your lex.
Bene vale,
Lucia Valeria Secunda Ianuaria
Materfamilias Gens Valeria Secunda
"Try to enjoy the great festival of life with other men"
Epictetus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Subject:	Re: [novaroma] Revision - Lex Cornelia de Tabulis Gentium Novaromanarum
From:	Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix <alexious@earthlink.net>
Date:	Tue, 05 Feb 2002 21:39:35 -0800

Ave Lucia Valeria Secunda et al,

According to the proposed lex there is an 8 week timetable ending at the
end of June (per item II). I believe that 8 weeks should be sufficient
to register with the Censors in regards to your status of
Materfamilias. If you are going to be gone during the entire
registration process you could always appoint a representative (as per
item IX), within your gens, to act for you during the time-frame. In my
honest opinion, that notification can be given to the Censors, and your
appointed designate, prior to the actual registration process. I hope
that either of these alternatives would be able to meet with your
needs. Finally, thank you for your support in my efforts to fix a
longstanding problem in Nova Roma.

Have a wonderful trip to Italy and Greece, I am so jealous!

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
Consul

Valerie Hartzer wrote:

> Salve Lucius Cornelius,
>
> In regards to the Lex on Pater/Mater annual Registration, I think it
> is a wonderfully sensible law and I highly support it as it actually
> works to solve a problem, not seeking to flog everyone in Nova Roma
> for the errors of a few. However I have one question on it...what
> happens if a Mater/ Pater is going to be out of the country and
> therefore incommunicato during the period of Gens registration. Can
> they apply to register early so that they may maintain their
> Mater/Pater status? I will be out of the country May 11- 27, 2002
> which is a large portion of the registration period. I have the worst
> timing for an anniversary sojurn to Italy and Greece!
> But my personal problems aside I applaud your lex.
> Bene vale,
> Lucia Valeria Secunda Ianuaria
> Materfamilias Gens Valeria Secunda
> "Try to enjoy the great festival of life with other men"
> Epictetus
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
[Click Here!]

>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Subject:	[novaroma] Re: Call for Candidates for Tribuni Plebis and Aedilis Plebeius
From:	"Franciscus Apulus Caesar" <sacro_barese_impero@libero.it>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:29:19 +0100

Franciscus Apulus Caesar Manio Villio Limitano S.P.D.

> I intend to defend everywhere and always the freedom of all Roman
> Citizens be they Plebeian or Patrician.
> In collaboration with the other tribunes I intend to elaborate and
> propose to you laws that explicit the freedom granted to all citizens,
> specially the freedom of speech.

Amice, I'm very interested to your program, but this is not enough, can you
explain your politican plan about the personal freedom and of speech?

Valete
Franciscus Apulus Caesar
Quaestor, Scriba Curatoris Araneum
-------------------------------------------
Provincia Italia - http://italia.novaroma.org
Alme Sol ... Possis Nihil Urbe Roma Visere Maius
Support me as Propraetor Italiae Provinciae
----------------------------------------
Paterfamilias Gens Apula - www.gensapula.too.it
----------------------------------------
Web Nova Roman Experiments - http://lab.novaroma.org/wnre

Subject:	[novaroma] Candidacy
From:	"curiobritannicus" <marcusaemiliusscaurus@hotmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 Feb 2002 13:58:39 -0000

Salvete cives,

I, Marcus Scribonius Curio Britannicus, declare my candidacy for
Aedilis Plebis.

My main priorities as Aedile would be working with the other Aediles
to create enjoyable Ludi, and also to do more to encourage activity
in those Sodalites which I am a part of, perhaps even working with
people from these Sodalites to enhance the Ludi.

Bene valete,
Marcus Scribonius Curio Britannicus.

Subject:	[novaroma] Lex Cornelia de Tabulis Gentium Novaromanarum Agendis
From:	Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix <alexious@earthlink.net>
Date:	Wed, 06 Feb 2002 06:50:55 -0800

Avete Omnes,

This is the latest revision of the proposed lex. The main difference
between this revision and other revisions is that there is a procedure
and deadline built in during a time a gens has to replace a
paterfamilias who has failed to register. This was added based on the
recommendation of Tribune Gn. Salix.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
Consul
____

Pursuant to the Constitution of Nova Roma (II.D.1 and II.D.3) The People
of Nova
Roma, via the Comitia Populi Tributa hereby enact this lex in regards to
the registration of Gentes and Paterfamiliae and Materfamiliae with the
Office of Censors.

(The use of the word paterfamilias is, for the purpose of this lex, will
include both Paterfamilias and materfamilias.)

I. Each Gens shall be registered with the office of the Censors every
year.

II. Registration of Gentes must be completed by the last day of June.

III. The censors must announce the opening of the registration period
at least 8 weeks before the deadline on the official Nova Roma email
list.

IV. Patresfamilias are responsible for contacting the Censores using
any of these methods:

A. Send an email to the Censors via the official email address of the
Office of the Censors, which is censors@novaroma.org at the time of the
passage of this lex.
B. Mail a written statement to the Nova Roma post office box.
C. Complete a form on the Nova Roma web site, the address of which
shall be specified by the Censores at the beginning of the registration
period.

V. The current official address of all Nova Roma Mail Correspondence
is:

Nova Roma
P.O. Box 1897,
Wells, ME 04090

At the time of the passage of this lex, the above address is the
official address, if the official address changes in the future, the new
mailing address should be utilized.

VI. When the deadline is reached, the Censors must publish a list of
Gentes that have failed to register with the Office of Censors. This
list must be published on the official Nova Roma email lists, are
currently located at novaroma@yahoogroups.com and
novaromaannounce@yahoogroups.com.

VII. A Gens that has failed to register with the office of Censors is
considered to have NO Paterfamilias. If there are other members of that
gens the Censors must work with the Gens to select a new Paterfamilias.

VIII. A Gens that has failed to register with the office of the
Censors, and which has no member other than its paterfamilias, shall be
removed from the Album Gentium. Its former members shall be considered
to belong to no Gens, and shall be given the nomen "Nemo". The nomen
formerly used by that Gens will be considered unused and available for
future applicants.

IX. Patresfamilias who are unable to communicate with the office of
Censors may appoint a designate within the Gens to act as
Paterfamilias. However, notification must be on file in the office of
the Censor(es).

X. During the period of time when there is no paterfamilias in the
Gens, the Gens will remain static. No new admissions may take place.

XI. While a Gens is still trying to pick a new paterfamilias, that gens
will be listed as closed for new citizens recruitment. The new
paterfamilias must notify the Censors, upon receipt of the position of
Paterfamilias if he/she wants to reopen the gens for new members.

XII. The following are procedures that must be followed before
individual(s) of a gens may be allowed to change gens affiliations due
to inactive and non responsive Paterfamilias as a result of the
registration process.

A. Once a Pater has failed to respond, the Censores contact the other
members of the gens and see if there is any of them willing to be a
paterfamilias. The deadline for this process to begin is two weeks from
the end of the registration period.

B. If there is just one responsive candidate, he is appointed as the
new Paterfamilias. And the gens is then registered.

C. If there are more than one responsive candidates, a decision must be
taken as to who the new Pater would be, the exact process for this would
be left up to the gens to decide. If member of the gens report to the
Censors that they are at an impasse the following two factors may be
used to break the impasse:

1. If there is a tie between two members who would become the new
Paterfamilias the Century point totals of the candidates would be used
as the tie breaker.
2. If there is a tie in century points then the length of citizenship
would then be utilized to break that tie.

D. After the two-week period has expired, and no responsive candidate
has come forward, those remaining gens members will be given the Nomen
“Nemo.” Each Gens member will be asked to either create a new Gens or
join an existing gens. The nomen formerly used by that Gens will be
considered unused and available for future applicants.

Subject:	[novaroma] Proposed LEX OCTAVIA DE SENATORIBUS
From:	Marcus Octavius Germanicus <haase@konoko.net>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:43:57 -0600 (CST)

M. Octavius Germanicus Quiritibus SPD,

It is an unfortunate fact of life that some citizens, after an initial
period of enthusiasm and dedication, will abandon Nova Roma, due to
a lack of time or a lack of interest. We have had elected magistrates
who have neglected their duties or become incommunicado within months
of the election, never to be heard from again. We have also had
magistrates who completed their term, fulfilling all that was expected
of them; only to vanish afterwards.

And we have Senators who have reguarly failed to participate in
Senate debates, or to vote in the Senate or the Comitia.

I believe that a Senator who neglects his responsibilities tarnishes
the dignity of the Senate as a whole. There are many fine citizens
who have done much good work for the Republic who are not yet in
the Senate; it is discouraging to them to be unrewarded, while the
purple stripe is worn by some citizens who don't even vote.

We do not want a "revolving-door" Senate, where citizens are Senators
only while holding a senior office. That is not historical. But
the other extreme is equally undesireable - a Senate populated by
empty shells, persons who are citizen in name only, who have not
participated in our public life for years.

The Constitution grants the Censores the ability to add and remove
Senators according to qualifications established "by law". There has
never been a law specifying conditions for removing Senators.
According to one interpretation of the Constitution, this would mean
that the Censores cannot act at all until a law exists; according to
another interpretation, they can act with complete freedom until
restricted by such a law.

Last month, the Senate issued its advice on the matter in the
form of a Senatus Consultum. As this is not a "law", it is not
binding on the Censores. While it establishes advisory guidelines,
at present we are still faced with the Constitutional question
of whether a right granted to a magistrate can be exercised in the
absense of a law detailing specifics.

Thus, I present the following law. The text is taken, with only
minor alterations, from the Senatus Consultum that was recently
passed, accepted by a majority vote of the Senate.

LEX OCTAVIA DE SENATORIBUS.

I. Membership in the Senate of Nova Roma shall be for life, so long
as a Senator maintains a minimum level of activity, as defined
herein.

II. Level of Activity Required.

A. A Senator is required to cast votes in at least one third of
the sessions of the Senate during any calendar year. Should he
or she fail to do so, he or she may be removed at the option
of the Censores.

B. Voting by proxy shall be considered acceptable for satisfying
these requirements, if and only if the right of proxy is granted
during the discussion period of the session for which proxy
is granted.

III. Removal of a Senator.

A. The Censores are empowered to use their judgement when considering
the removal of a Senator who has failed to maintain the minimum
level of activity, and to either retain or remove that Senator
at their option. The Censores should consider whether a valid
excuse for failing to remain active has been offered.

B. The Senator to be removed has sixty days to appeal his or
her removal to any magistrate capable of convening the Senate.
A 2/3rds supermajority of the Senate, excluding the Censores,
is required to override the Censores and halt the removal.

C. An ex-Senator who has been removed may be later restored
to the Senate by the Censores.

IV. Exemptions.

A. Censores, Consuls, and Praetores are exempt during their year
in office, regardless of their participation level the previous
year. Any Senator appointed less than six months before the end
of the preceding year is exempt.

B. In recognition of their service to the Republic, any Senator who
has completed a full term as Consul or Censor may be removed
from the Senate if and only if he or she fails the test
described in Section II for four consecutive years.

C. Any Senator who has served in the Senate for ten years is
forever after exempt from removal for reason of inactivity.

V. This law shall go into effect on the Kalends of Ianuarius
MMDCCLVI auc (1 January 2003).


I would like to see this lex brought to a vote this month.

Vale,
M. Octavius Germanicus,
Consul.


--
Marcus Octavius Germanicus
Consul of Nova Roma, MMDCCLV a.u.c.
Curator Araneum et Senator

Subject:	[novaroma] Schedule for summoning the Comitia Populi Tributa
From:	"L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@earthlink.net>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:02:46 -0800

Avete Citizens of Nova Roma,

In compliance with the Lex Vedia de Ratione Comitiorum Populi Tributorum it brings me much pleasure to summon the Comitia Populi Tributa to vote.

The planned Contio will extend from 10 to 18 Feb., and the votation is
planned to extend from 18 Feb. to 26 Feb.

So, in conclusion, the schedule is:
10 Feb. -> Contio begins
18 Feb. -> Voting starts
26 Feb. -> Voting ends

At the start of the Contio, the proposed laws will be published. If you have any questions please feel free to email me.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
Consul of Nova Roma


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Subject:	[novaroma] Schedule for Summoning the Comitia Centuriata
From:	"L. Cornelius Sulla" <alexious@earthlink.net>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:02:49 -0800

Avete Citizens of Nova Roma,

In compliance with the Lex Vedia de Ratione Comitiorum Centuriatorum it brings me much pleasure to summon the Comitia Centuriata to vote.

The planned Contio will extend from 10 to 18 Feb., and the votation is
planned to extend from 18 Feb. to 26 Feb.

So, in conclusion, the schedule is:
10 Feb. -> Contio begins
18 Feb. -> Voting starts
26 Feb. -> Voting ends

At the start of the Contio, the proposed laws will be published. If you have any questions please feel free to email me.

Respectfully,

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
Consul of Nova Roma


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Subject:	[novaroma] Update on Curule Aedile
From:	"pompeia_cornelia" <trog99@hotmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 Feb 2002 20:15:28 -0000

Salvete Omnes:

Just to let those in question know, I have heard from A. Claudius
Petrus, the Curule Aedile et Legatus Canada Orientalis a few minutes
ago.

He apologizes for being out of the loop, but he has had major
computer problems and other distractions.

He hopes to be back soon.

Bene vale,
Pompeia Cornelia

Subject:	Re: [novaroma] Update on Curule Aedile
From:	Lucilla Cornelia Cinna <CorneliaLucilla@yahoo.com>
Date:	Wed, 06 Feb 2002 21:47:04 +0100

Salve pompeia soror carissima!

pompeia_cornelia wrote:

>Just to let those in question know, I have heard from A. Claudius
>Petrus, the Curule Aedile et Legatus Canada Orientalis a few minutes
>ago.
>
>He apologizes for being out of the loop, but he has had major
>computer problems and other distractions.
>
>He hopes to be back soon.
>
Good to know. <sigh of relief> I was really getting worried. If you
catch him somehow, please tell him that I am glad to hear that he is
fine and my best wishes for his efforts!

Bene vale


Lucilla Cornelia Cinna _
====================== \\
Procuratrix Provinciae Germaniae /\~/\ / )
Praefecta Retaria Sodalitatis Egressus ( )~~~----...,, __/ /
Musaea collegiorum Calliopes Cliusque \` ´/ /
Sodalitatis Musarum \v/ _____( |
Scriba C. Flavio Diocletiano Censori /\_| |~~~~´ \ \ \
Scriba T. Labieno Fortunato Praetori ( ( | | ) /\ )
Scriba Claudio Amulio Petro Aedili Curuli \_\| | _/ / _| |
Civis NovaRomana /__/ /__/ /__/
Auctrix Curatrixque Bibliothecae Germanicae
http://www.BibliothecaGermanica.de/

Subject:	Re: [novaroma] Update on Curule Aedile
From:	Caeso Fabius Quintilianus <tjalens.h@telia.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2002 22:13:48 +0100

Salve Illustrus Pompeia Cornelia Strabo!

Thank You for forwarding this message. I would be glad if You could
send my greetings to my collegue Illustrus Amulius Claudius Petrus!
Tell him that it is a relief and a joy to hear from him!

>Salvete Omnes:
>
>Just to let those in question know, I have heard from A. Claudius
>Petrus, the Curule Aedile et Legatus Canada Orientalis a few minutes
>ago.
>
>He apologizes for being out of the loop, but he has had major
>computer problems and other distractions.
>
>He hopes to be back soon.
>
>Bene vale,
>Pompeia Cornelia

--

Vale

Caeso Fabius Quintilianus
Senior Curule Aedile
Propraetor of Thule
AUCTOR LEGIONIS, Legio VII "Res Publica"

The Opinions expressed are my own,
and not an official opinion of Nova Roma
************************************************
The homepage of the Nova Roma Provincia Thule:
http://thule.novaroma.org/
************************************************
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
"I'll either find a way or make one"
************************************************
"Do not give in to hate. That leads to the dark side."
************************************************
Caeso, he who also is known as Christer Edling.
************************************************
PRIVATE PHONE: +90 - 10 09 10



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/