Session January 2771

From NovaRoma
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents



Presiding Magistrate

Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix, Princeps Senatus

Quorum

The Senate of Nova Roma currently has 17 members, all of whom are senators with full rights. Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus is on Leave - his Proxy is assigned to Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix. Statia Cornelia Valeriana Iuliana Aeternia was also excused - her Proxy is assigned to Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix. Therefore, as per XI.J of the SENATUS CONSULTUM DE RATIONE SENATUS MMDCCLXV, both are deemed present.

Thus, there are 17 voting members of the Senate giving a minimum quorum of 12 voting members. With 17 voting members present the quorum is achieved.

Schedule

09:00 AM Arizona Time of a.d. XVII Kal. Feb. 2771 AVC (16 January 2018) Call to order. Debate period commences.
09:00 AM Arizona Time of a.d. IX Kal. Feb. 2771 AVC (24 January 2018) Debate period ends.
09:00 AM Arizona Time of a.d. VIII Kal. Feb. 2771 AVC (25 January 2018) Call to vote. Voting period commences.
09:00 AM Arizona Time of prid. Kal. Feb. 2771 AVC (31 January 2018) Voting period ends.
09:00 AM Arizona Time of Kal. Feb. 2771 AVC (01 February 2018) Call to close session.



Agenda

I Electoral process (Discussion only)
II Competing Organizations
III CIO reappointment



List of Senators who voted in this session

The following 13 senators cast votes in time during this formal session of the Senate. Their initials and full names are listed below in alphabetical order by nomen:

Initials Name
PACP P. Annaeus Constantinus Placidus
MCGG M. Cornelius Gualterus Graecus
LCSF L. Cornelius Sulla Felix, Acting Princeps Senatus
StaCVIA Sta. Cornelia Valeriana Iuliana Aeternia
QFM Q. Fabius Maximus
CnIC Cn. Iulius Caesar
DeIPI De. Iunius Palladius Invictus, Princeps Senatus (on leave)
TIS T. Iulius Sabinus
CMCV C. Maria Caeca
CPD C. Petronius Dexter
MPC M. Pompeius Caninus
QSP Q. Suetonius Paulinus
PUSV P. Ullerius Stephanus Venator



Item II - Competing Organizations

Proposal

SENATUS CONSULTUM ON THE DESIGNATION OF FREE NOVA ROMA AND SAVING NOVA ROMA AS COMPETING ORGANIZATIONS
The Senate of Nova Roma deems that the organizations, which are effectively one and the same organization, known and/or operating as:
Free Nova Roma (aka Non-corporate Nova Roma, aka Nova Roma non-corporate community)
and
Saving Nova Roma
and which are currently operating at the time of the enactment of this Senatus consultum under the internet domain names of:
http://nova-roma.org/
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/saving-nova-roma/info
are competing organizations.
This Senatus consultum shall apply also to any successor organization that may arise from a change of operating name of either or both organizations, or a change of either or both URLs where a similar purpose as one or both organizations is evident.


Result

Vote Result
Uti rogas 10
Antiquo 3
Abstineo 0
Passed


Individual votes

Initials Vote Comments
DeIPI Uti rogas
LCSF Uti rogas
CnIC Uti rogas
TIS Uti rogas
PACP Antiquo
QFM Uti rogas
PUSV Uti rogas "Competition can come from within, have seen organizations with smaller, similar and larger membership torn apart by internal dissent. My advice has long been, do not like how things are going, and other folks do, and do not want your change, go someplace where you can create something to your wants. I have to say it is ironic that a Priest of Concornia is one of the dissident voices."
StaCVIA Uti rogas
MPC Antiquo "I vote against designating Nova Roma members who established a website and mailing list as a competing organization. The notion that they are a competing organization is silly. Saving Nova Roma is not an organization, it is simply a mailing list for the plaintiffs. Free Nova Roma is simply a website run by some of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs cannot be a competing organization, regardless of any concerns about a 'state within a state' or conspiracy theories that members of this body may entertain. Designating members of Nova Roma who have a beef with the Senate as having established a competing organization is an inflammatory action that shows the Senate has no desire to negotiate or to defuse the conflict. With this agenda item, the Senate majority is yet again stealing power from the citizens in comitia by enacting rules regarding membership that should be decided by the members."
MCGG Uti rogas
CPD Antiquo
CMCV Uti rogas "Had the litigants not held elections and established a rogue NR Government, it is likely I would have advocated for some sort of negotiations, even some form of compromise ..but this action, and the statements of Lentulus on the main forum, basically indicating that the corporation itself is illegitimate precludes that. If they have their own Government and Magistrates, they are, ipso facto, a state within a State, and thus a competing organization housed with Nova Roma itself. I find this entirely unacceptable, and while I am loathe to stand against many who I once considered friends, even close friends, my interest, and my ONLY interest, is the well being and protection of Nova Roma itself."
QSP Uti rogas



Item III - CIO reappointment

Proposal

SENATUS CONSULTUM ON THE REAPPOINTMENT OF MARCUS POMPEIUS CANINUS AS CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER
The Senate of Nova Roma appoints Marcus Pompeius Caninus as CIO/MA for a period of 2 years, effective with the passage of this Senatus Consultum. His two year term shall end on 01 February 2020.


Result

Vote Result
Uti rogas 11
Antiquo 1
Abstineo 1
Passed


Individual votes

Initials Vote Comments
DeIPI Uti rogas
LCSF Uti rogas
CnIC Uti rogas
TIS Uti rogas "However I want to believe we reappoint a CIO who will protect Nova Roma and not look superficially to those who registered the necessary tools (webdomain for example) to run a parasite organization."
PACP Uti rogas
QFM Uti rogas
PUSV Uti rogas "I think continuity is good, and a reasoned mind, even if we have a few small points of difference, is good in this position."
StaCVIA Uti rogas
MPC Abstineo
MCGG Uti rogas
CPD Antiquo
CMCV Uti rogas
QSP Uti rogas



Session Voting Summary Results by Senator

A visual summary of the votes cast by each Senator:

Initials Item II Item III
DeIPI II III
LCSF II III
CnIC II III
TIS II III
PACP II III
PUSV II III
QFM II III
StaCVIA II III
MPC II III
MCGG II III
CPD II III
CMCV II III
QSP II III
Legend: Green - Uti rogas (Yes), Red - Antiquo (No), Yellow - Abstineo (Abstain)



Personal tools