Category talk:Roman Book of Gods - Revision history

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus: Comment

2006-04-10T03:00:29Z

Comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 10 April 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I agree - simple titles are best. [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 11:03, 8 April 2006 (CDT)		I agree - simple titles are best. [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 11:03, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
		+
		+	== Comment ==
		+
		+	I agree with renaming Roman Book of Gods to some other category (perhaps just "Gods" or, mor appropriately, "Deities"). I do, though, want to seperate Roman Gods from Hellenic, Egyptian, Norse, etc. I'm not a Wiki expert, so if someone could create the proper category, and move "Gods, Roman" into that category, I'd appreciate it. -- [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus]] 22:00, 9 April 2006 (CDT)

Marcus Octavius Gracchus: agree with Agricola

2006-04-08T16:03:28Z

agree with Agricola

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:03, 8 April 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We might want to relocate this page (Category:Roman Book of Gods) and also "Gods, Roman" to more wiki-friendly titles. The reason is that linking is simpler when article titles are written in normal sentence syntax. Linking to "Gods, Roman" will always require a "piped link" whereas "Roman Gods" would not. Likewise, this page might be better named "Greco-Roman Gods" or even "Gods known to the Romans" (to include Egyptian and all other Gods). Also, using the simplest terms will increase the chance of hitting the correct page on a search. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 09:37, 8 April 2006 (CDT)		We might want to relocate this page (Category:Roman Book of Gods) and also "Gods, Roman" to more wiki-friendly titles. The reason is that linking is simpler when article titles are written in normal sentence syntax. Linking to "Gods, Roman" will always require a "piped link" whereas "Roman Gods" would not. Likewise, this page might be better named "Greco-Roman Gods" or even "Gods known to the Romans" (to include Egyptian and all other Gods). Also, using the simplest terms will increase the chance of hitting the correct page on a search. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 09:37, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
		+
		+	I agree - simple titles are best. [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 11:03, 8 April 2006 (CDT)

M. Lucretius Agricola: Suggest renaming pages

2006-04-08T14:37:31Z

Suggest renaming pages

New page

We might want to relocate this page (Category:Roman Book of Gods) and also "Gods, Roman" to more wiki-friendly titles. The reason is that linking is simpler when article titles are written in normal sentence syntax. Linking to "Gods, Roman" will always require a "piped link" whereas "Roman Gods" would not. Likewise, this page might be better named "Greco-Roman Gods" or even "Gods known to the Romans" (to include Egyptian and all other Gods). Also, using the simplest terms will increase the chance of hitting the correct page on a search. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 09:37, 8 April 2006 (CDT)