Edicta of Praetores MMDCCLXI - Revision history

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis: /* XII. Effective Date of this Edictum */

2009-01-03T20:20:43Z

XII. Effective Date of this Edictum

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 3 January 2009
Line 786:		Line 786:
	To execute an incontestable judgement or a publicly certified settlement, the Praetor may, on application of a party, call on all legal expedients available to him. He may also call on the help of all Magistrates of Nova Roma, who shall render such assistance as they are reasonably able to do so. The violation of an oath falls under the jusrisdiction of the collegia of the priesthood.		To execute an incontestable judgement or a publicly certified settlement, the Praetor may, on application of a party, call on all legal expedients available to him. He may also call on the help of all Magistrates of Nova Roma, who shall render such assistance as they are reasonably able to do so. The violation of an oath falls under the jusrisdiction of the collegia of the priesthood.

−	==XII. Effective Date of this Edictum==	+	===XII. Effective Date of this Edictum===

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis: /* XI. Execution of Judgements */

2009-01-03T20:20:18Z

XI. Execution of Judgements

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 3 January 2009
Line 780:		Line 780:
	2. In those cases where a sententia does not imply a loss of citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly claim a confirmation vote from the Comitia Populi Tributa within fifteen (15) days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims this right, the consules shall call the Comitia Populi Tributa . Should the Comitia Populi Tributa confirm the sententia, the sententia shall be applied. Should the Comitia Populi Tributa vote against the sententia, the sententia shall be nullified.		2. In those cases where a sententia does not imply a loss of citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly claim a confirmation vote from the Comitia Populi Tributa within fifteen (15) days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims this right, the consules shall call the Comitia Populi Tributa . Should the Comitia Populi Tributa confirm the sententia, the sententia shall be applied. Should the Comitia Populi Tributa vote against the sententia, the sententia shall be nullified.

−	==XI. Execution of Judgements==	+	===XI. Execution of Judgements===



	To execute an incontestable judgement or a publicly certified settlement, the Praetor may, on application of a party, call on all legal expedients available to him. He may also call on the help of all Magistrates of Nova Roma, who shall render such assistance as they are reasonably able to do so. The violation of an oath falls under the jusrisdiction of the collegia of the priesthood.		To execute an incontestable judgement or a publicly certified settlement, the Praetor may, on application of a party, call on all legal expedients available to him. He may also call on the help of all Magistrates of Nova Roma, who shall render such assistance as they are reasonably able to do so. The violation of an oath falls under the jusrisdiction of the collegia of the priesthood.
−
−

	==XII. Effective Date of this Edictum==		==XII. Effective Date of this Edictum==

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis: /* X. Provocatione ad Populum */

2009-01-03T20:19:55Z

X. Provocatione ad Populum

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 3 January 2009
Line 770:		Line 770:
	2. The fines for contempt may be reduced by up to 90%, at discretion of the Praetores, in the case that the fined citizen carry out the mandate or of the Praetores or of the Court		2. The fines for contempt may be reduced by up to 90%, at discretion of the Praetores, in the case that the fined citizen carry out the mandate or of the Praetores or of the Court

−	==X. Provocatione ad Populum==	+	===X. Provocatione ad Populum===


Line 779:		Line 779:

	2. In those cases where a sententia does not imply a loss of citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly claim a confirmation vote from the Comitia Populi Tributa within fifteen (15) days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims this right, the consules shall call the Comitia Populi Tributa . Should the Comitia Populi Tributa confirm the sententia, the sententia shall be applied. Should the Comitia Populi Tributa vote against the sententia, the sententia shall be nullified.		2. In those cases where a sententia does not imply a loss of citizenship, the reus shall have the right to publicly claim a confirmation vote from the Comitia Populi Tributa within fifteen (15) days after the issue of the sentence. Once the reus claims this right, the consules shall call the Comitia Populi Tributa . Should the Comitia Populi Tributa confirm the sententia, the sententia shall be applied. Should the Comitia Populi Tributa vote against the sententia, the sententia shall be nullified.
−
−

	==XI. Execution of Judgements==		==XI. Execution of Judgements==

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis: /* IX. Appeal and Reduction of fines */

2009-01-03T20:19:32Z

IX. Appeal and Reduction of fines

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 3 January 2009
Line 762:		Line 762:
	4. Contempt: The citizen accused of contempt may be fined with no small amount equal to the taxes of two years and not over US $ 100.00 and shall be counted among the capite censi until the fine has been paid.		4. Contempt: The citizen accused of contempt may be fined with no small amount equal to the taxes of two years and not over US $ 100.00 and shall be counted among the capite censi until the fine has been paid.

−	==IX. Appeal and Reduction of fines==	+	===IX. Appeal and Reduction of fines===


Line 769:		Line 769:

	2. The fines for contempt may be reduced by up to 90%, at discretion of the Praetores, in the case that the fined citizen carry out the mandate or of the Praetores or of the Court		2. The fines for contempt may be reduced by up to 90%, at discretion of the Praetores, in the case that the fined citizen carry out the mandate or of the Praetores or of the Court
−
−

	==X. Provocatione ad Populum==		==X. Provocatione ad Populum==

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis: /* VIII. De Criminibus Poenisque */

2009-01-03T20:19:06Z

VIII. De Criminibus Poenisque

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 3 January 2009
Line 750:		Line 750:
	2. Once all the iudices have issued their sententiae, the praetor shall immediately inform the parties of the sententia, and shall enforce any penalties through his imperium.		2. Once all the iudices have issued their sententiae, the praetor shall immediately inform the parties of the sententia, and shall enforce any penalties through his imperium.

−	==VIII. De Criminibus Poenisque==	+	===VIII. De Criminibus Poenisque===


Line 760:		Line 760:
	3. Breach of warranty provided by the Vindex: the Vindex may be fined with no small amount equal to the taxes of one year and not over US $ 30.00. The Vindex shall be counted among the capite censi until the fine has been paid.		3. Breach of warranty provided by the Vindex: the Vindex may be fined with no small amount equal to the taxes of one year and not over US $ 30.00. The Vindex shall be counted among the capite censi until the fine has been paid.

−	4. Contempt: The citizen accused of contempt may be fined with no small amount equal to the taxes of two years and not over US $ 100.00 and shall be counted among the capite censi until the fine has been paid.	+	4. Contempt: The citizen accused of contempt may be fined with no small amount equal to the taxes of two years and not over US $ 100.00 and shall be counted among the capite censi until the fine has been paid.
−		+
−		+
−		+
−		+
−		+

	==IX. Appeal and Reduction of fines==		==IX. Appeal and Reduction of fines==

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis: /* VII. Sententia */

2009-01-03T20:18:38Z

VII. Sententia

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 3 January 2009
Line 729:		Line 729:
	E. Once both parties have presented their evidence, each party shall have the opportunity to make one final statement in front of the iudices, with the actor speaking in the first place. Then the praetor shall call for a sententia (sentence) from the iudices, according to Pars V of this Edict, reminding the iudices that, in case of doubt, they must not condemn the reus.		E. Once both parties have presented their evidence, each party shall have the opportunity to make one final statement in front of the iudices, with the actor speaking in the first place. Then the praetor shall call for a sententia (sentence) from the iudices, according to Pars V of this Edict, reminding the iudices that, in case of doubt, they must not condemn the reus.

−	== VII. Sententia==	+	=== VII. Sententia===


Line 748:		Line 748:


−	2. Once all the iudices have issued their sententiae, the praetor shall immediately inform the parties of the sententia, and shall enforce any penalties through his imperium.	+	2. Once all the iudices have issued their sententiae, the praetor shall immediately inform the parties of the sententia, and shall enforce any penalties through his imperium.
−		+

	==VIII. De Criminibus Poenisque==		==VIII. De Criminibus Poenisque==

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis: /* VI. Iudicium */

2009-01-03T20:17:14Z

VI. Iudicium

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:17, 3 January 2009
Line 653:		Line 653:
	'''Bold text'''		'''Bold text'''

−	==VI. Iudicium==	+	===VI. Iudicium===



−	===1. SI IN IUS VOCAT, ITO.===	+	====1. SI IN IUS VOCAT, ITO.====


Line 665:		Line 665:


−	===2. COM PERORANTO AMBO PRAESENTES:===	+	====2. COM PERORANTO AMBO PRAESENTES:====

	Both Actor and Reus must be present in the court to speak; they shall plead together in person.		Both Actor and Reus must be present in the court to speak; they shall plead together in person.
Line 671:		Line 671:


−	===3. POST MERIDIEM PRAESENTI LITEM ADDICITO===	+	====3. POST MERIDIEM PRAESENTI LITEM ADDICITO====


Line 707:		Line 707:


−	===4. PROCEDURES===	+	====4. PROCEDURES====


Line 727:		Line 727:


−	E. Once both parties have presented their evidence, each party shall have the opportunity to make one final statement in front of the iudices, with the actor speaking in the first place. Then the praetor shall call for a sententia (sentence) from the iudices, according to Pars V of this Edict, reminding the iudices that, in case of doubt, they must not condemn the reus.	+	E. Once both parties have presented their evidence, each party shall have the opportunity to make one final statement in front of the iudices, with the actor speaking in the first place. Then the praetor shall call for a sententia (sentence) from the iudices, according to Pars V of this Edict, reminding the iudices that, in case of doubt, they must not condemn the reus.
−		+
−		+

	== VII. Sententia==		== VII. Sententia==

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis: /* V. The Iudices */

2009-01-03T20:16:10Z

V. The Iudices

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 3 January 2009
Line 610:		Line 610:
	B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations. Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense dictates that such a course of action is necessary.		B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations. Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense dictates that such a course of action is necessary.

−	==V. The Iudices==	+	===V. The Iudices===


Line 650:		Line 650:


−	D. If both parties can agree on a certain citizen(s) of Nova Roma to judge their case before a definitive group of legal iudices has been appointed, then the praetor shall include that citizen (or those citizens) among the iudices for the current case.	+	D. If both parties can agree on a certain citizen(s) of Nova Roma to judge their case before a definitive group of legal iudices has been appointed, then the praetor shall include that citizen (or those citizens) among the iudices for the current case.
−		+	'''Bold text'''
−		+

	==VI. Iudicium==		==VI. Iudicium==

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis: /* IV. Formula */

2009-01-03T20:15:33Z

IV. Formula

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 3 January 2009
Line 564:		Line 564:
	F. If the Actor withdraws his claim before judgement, he or she loses the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same case in perpetuity. If the Actor presents new evidence, which is material to the claim itself, the Praetor decides, by his discretion, if the presented evidence are sufficient enough to approve the claim again.		F. If the Actor withdraws his claim before judgement, he or she loses the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same case in perpetuity. If the Actor presents new evidence, which is material to the claim itself, the Praetor decides, by his discretion, if the presented evidence are sufficient enough to approve the claim again.

−	==IV. Formula==	+	===IV. Formula===


Line 608:		Line 608:


−	B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations. Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense dictates that such a course of action is necessary.	+	B. Iurisprudentia: in those cases where the laws do not present an explicit treatment of a certain situation, a praetor shall create iurisprudentia (jurisprudence) applicable to all similar situations. Iurisprudentia is an expression of the Imperium of the praetor, and it has the same legislative power as a praetorial edictum. Because of this, laws approved by the Comitia shall always supersede iurisprudentia, and a certain praetor can alter previous iurisprudentia through an official edictum whenever common sense dictates that such a course of action is necessary.
−		+
−		+
−		+
−		+

	==V. The Iudices==		==V. The Iudices==

Marcus Curiatius Complutensis: /* III. Admissibility of claim */

2009-01-03T20:14:48Z

III. Admissibility of claim

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 3 January 2009
Line 522:		Line 522:
	2. The statement of claim must consist of the facts of the case, the offering of available proof, the applicable law, supporting arguments for the application of law on the facts of the case.		2. The statement of claim must consist of the facts of the case, the offering of available proof, the applicable law, supporting arguments for the application of law on the facts of the case.

−	==III. Admissibility of claim==	+	===III. Admissibility of claim===


Line 563:		Line 563:

	F. If the Actor withdraws his claim before judgement, he or she loses the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same case in perpetuity. If the Actor presents new evidence, which is material to the claim itself, the Praetor decides, by his discretion, if the presented evidence are sufficient enough to approve the claim again.		F. If the Actor withdraws his claim before judgement, he or she loses the right to address the Praetor's Court with the same case in perpetuity. If the Actor presents new evidence, which is material to the claim itself, the Praetor decides, by his discretion, if the presented evidence are sufficient enough to approve the claim again.
−
−

	==IV. Formula==		==IV. Formula==