http://novaroma.org/vici/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ALex_Salvia_de_intercessione_%28Nova_Roma%29 2026-04-17T09:44:47Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.17.0 http://novaroma.org/vici/index.php?title=Talk:Lex_Salvia_de_intercessione_(Nova_Roma)&diff=56969&oldid=prev 2021-11-26T17:45:34Z

<p>moved <a href="/nr/Talk:Lex_Labiena_de_intercessione_(Nova_Roma)" class="mw-redirect" title="Talk:Lex Labiena de intercessione (Nova Roma)">Talk:Lex Labiena de intercessione (Nova Roma)</a> to <a href="/nr/Talk:Lex_Salvia_de_intercessione_(Nova_Roma)" title="Talk:Lex Salvia de intercessione (Nova Roma)">Talk:Lex Salvia de intercessione (Nova Roma)</a></p> <table style="background-color: white; color:black;"> <tr valign='top'> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='1' style="background-color: white; color:black;">Revision as of 17:45, 26 November 2021</td> </tr></table>

Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus http://novaroma.org/vici/index.php?title=Talk:Lex_Salvia_de_intercessione_(Nova_Roma)&diff=56692&oldid=prev 2021-10-19T03:30:13Z

<p>Codex Juris Audit: Correction to Law list</p> <table style="background-color: white; color:black;"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr valign='top'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">Revision as of 03:30, 19 October 2021</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>'''AURELIUS''': This lex uses old references that no longer correctly reference the constitution, now that it has changed. However, the validity of the law remains sound and it would be worth a Praetor to exercise their power of interpretation where required. --[[User:Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius|Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius]] 05:15, 19 October 2021 (CEST)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>'''AURELIUS''': This lex uses old references that no longer correctly reference the constitution, now that it has changed. However, the validity of the law remains sound and it would be worth a Praetor to exercise their power of interpretation where required. --[[User:Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius|Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius]] 05:15, 19 October 2021 (CEST)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">'''AURELIUS''': The [[List of leges (Nova Roma)]] states that this lex was modified by Lex LXXIII ([[Lex Didia Gemina de potestate tribunicia (Nova Roma)]]). But when analyzing the leges, no modification or contradiction is observed. </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Recommendation: Change the Row for Lex XLVI in [[List of leges (Nova Roma)]] to simply have the status of 'In Force'.</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius http://novaroma.org/vici/index.php?title=Talk:Lex_Salvia_de_intercessione_(Nova_Roma)&diff=56691&oldid=prev 2021-10-19T03:15:38Z

<p>Codex Juris Audit: Refer to Praetors</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>'''AURELIUS''': This lex uses old references that no longer correctly reference the constitution, now that it has changed. However, the validity of the law remains sound and it would be worth a Praetor to exercise their power of interpretation where required. --[[User:Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius|Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius]] 05:15, 19 October 2021 (CEST)</div>

Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius