Talk:Publicity material - Revision history

M. Lucretius Agricola: repoint lmk

2008-08-11T01:55:27Z

repoint lmk

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 11 August 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	It looks from the context of the link from [[:~~Reenactments~~:~~Legiones~~]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT)	+	It looks from the context of the link from [[:Category:Reenactments]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
	:Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date.		:Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date.

	::How about '''Publicity Material (Nova Roma)'''? [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 09:30, 16 July 2006 (CDT)		::How about '''Publicity Material (Nova Roma)'''? [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 09:30, 16 July 2006 (CDT)
	:::Let's lower-case the "M": "Publicity material (Nova Roma)". This will let us blend the link easily into text. Remember, we can make the first letter in a link lower case and the wiki will automatically link to the upper-case version, but that trick works '''only''' for the first letter. Also, in this case I am of the opinion that the (Nova Roma) tag is not needed, as there is no ambiguity, but the policy seems to dictate we use it. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 15:26, 16 July 2006 (CDT)		:::Let's lower-case the "M": "Publicity material (Nova Roma)". This will let us blend the link easily into text. Remember, we can make the first letter in a link lower case and the wiki will automatically link to the upper-case version, but that trick works '''only''' for the first letter. Also, in this case I am of the opinion that the (Nova Roma) tag is not needed, as there is no ambiguity, but the policy seems to dictate we use it. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 15:26, 16 July 2006 (CDT)

M. Lucretius Agricola: repoint link

2008-08-11T01:54:35Z

repoint link

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 11 August 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	It looks from the context of the link from [[:~~Category~~:Legiones]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT)	+	It looks from the context of the link from [[:Reenactments:Legiones]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
	:Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date.		:Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date.

	::How about '''Publicity Material (Nova Roma)'''? [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 09:30, 16 July 2006 (CDT)		::How about '''Publicity Material (Nova Roma)'''? [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 09:30, 16 July 2006 (CDT)
	:::Let's lower-case the "M": "Publicity material (Nova Roma)". This will let us blend the link easily into text. Remember, we can make the first letter in a link lower case and the wiki will automatically link to the upper-case version, but that trick works '''only''' for the first letter. Also, in this case I am of the opinion that the (Nova Roma) tag is not needed, as there is no ambiguity, but the policy seems to dictate we use it. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 15:26, 16 July 2006 (CDT)		:::Let's lower-case the "M": "Publicity material (Nova Roma)". This will let us blend the link easily into text. Remember, we can make the first letter in a link lower case and the wiki will automatically link to the upper-case version, but that trick works '''only''' for the first letter. Also, in this case I am of the opinion that the (Nova Roma) tag is not needed, as there is no ambiguity, but the policy seems to dictate we use it. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 15:26, 16 July 2006 (CDT)

M. Lucretius Agricola: Talk:Nova Roma literature moved to Talk:Publicity material: to remove ambiguity as regards contents. see talk page

2006-07-27T03:58:57Z

Talk:Nova Roma literature moved to Talk:Publicity material: to remove ambiguity as regards contents. see talk page

← Older revision

Revision as of 03:58, 27 July 2006

M. Lucretius Agricola: small comments

2006-07-16T20:26:06Z

small comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:26, 16 July 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:

	::How about '''Publicity Material (Nova Roma)'''? [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 09:30, 16 July 2006 (CDT)		::How about '''Publicity Material (Nova Roma)'''? [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 09:30, 16 July 2006 (CDT)
		+	:::Let's lower-case the "M": "Publicity material (Nova Roma)". This will let us blend the link easily into text. Remember, we can make the first letter in a link lower case and the wiki will automatically link to the upper-case version, but that trick works '''only''' for the first letter. Also, in this case I am of the opinion that the (Nova Roma) tag is not needed, as there is no ambiguity, but the policy seems to dictate we use it. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 15:26, 16 July 2006 (CDT)

Aulus Apollonius Cordus: Suggestion

2006-07-16T14:30:28Z

Suggestion

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 16 July 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	It looks from the context of the link from [[:Category:Legiones]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT)		It looks from the context of the link from [[:Category:Legiones]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
	:Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date.		:Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date.
		+
		+	::How about '''Publicity Material (Nova Roma)'''? [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 09:30, 16 July 2006 (CDT)

M. Lucretius Agricola: agree

2006-07-13T13:29:39Z

agree

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 13 July 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	It looks from the context of the link from [[:Category:Legiones]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT)		It looks from the context of the link from [[:Category:Legiones]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus\|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
		+	:Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date.

Aulus Apollonius Cordus: Name of article?

2006-07-13T11:31:19Z

Name of article?

New page

It looks from the context of the link from [[:Category:Legiones]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT)