Template talk:TableOfLictoresCuriati - Revision history

Aulus Apollonius Cordus: Template talk:TableOfLictoresCuriata moved to Template talk:TableOfLictoresCuriati: The Latin was wrong

2006-04-12T00:00:16Z

Template talk:TableOfLictoresCuriata moved to Template talk:TableOfLictoresCuriati: The Latin was wrong

← Older revision

Revision as of 00:00, 12 April 2006

M. Lucretius Agricola: I see your point

2006-04-11T14:15:58Z

I see your point

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 11 April 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Is it really a good idea to make this here? It seems to me that this is the sort of thing that the old database-driven site is good at. We could make this table THERE, generating it automagically from a "lictor" flag. We could alter the scripts to point things at the wiki if we want to. Aren't we making more work ~~ofr~~ ourselves if we put this here? Of course, if Mediawiki can generate this automatically then ignore the above... {{M. Lucretius Agricola}}	+	Is it really a good idea to make this here? It seems to me that this is the sort of thing that the old database-driven site is good at. We could make this table THERE, generating it automagically from a "lictor" flag. We could alter the scripts to point things at the wiki if we want to. Aren't we making more work for ourselves if we put this here? Of course, if Mediawiki can generate this automatically then ignore the above... {{M. Lucretius Agricola}}

	The advantage to having it in the wiki is that anyone can build such pages. In the old site, anything dynamic has to be done by me, and I just don't have the time. Ideally, everything would be automated, and that's the approach I used for the old site five years ago... but I think now that it's just easier to rely on having a large number of volunteers. [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 07:57, 11 April 2006 (CDT)		The advantage to having it in the wiki is that anyone can build such pages. In the old site, anything dynamic has to be done by me, and I just don't have the time. Ideally, everything would be automated, and that's the approach I used for the old site five years ago... but I think now that it's just easier to rely on having a large number of volunteers. [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 07:57, 11 April 2006 (CDT)
		+
		+	:I can see your point. "Many hands make light work."

Marcus Octavius Gracchus: better to do it here

2006-04-11T12:57:51Z

better to do it here

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 11 April 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is it really a good idea to make this here? It seems to me that this is the sort of thing that the old database-driven site is good at. We could make this table THERE, generating it automagically from a "lictor" flag. We could alter the scripts to point things at the wiki if we want to. Aren't we making more work ofr ourselves if we put this here? Of course, if Mediawiki can generate this automatically then ignore the above... {{M. Lucretius Agricola}}		Is it really a good idea to make this here? It seems to me that this is the sort of thing that the old database-driven site is good at. We could make this table THERE, generating it automagically from a "lictor" flag. We could alter the scripts to point things at the wiki if we want to. Aren't we making more work ofr ourselves if we put this here? Of course, if Mediawiki can generate this automatically then ignore the above... {{M. Lucretius Agricola}}
		+
		+	The advantage to having it in the wiki is that anyone can build such pages. In the old site, anything dynamic has to be done by me, and I just don't have the time. Ideally, everything would be automated, and that's the approach I used for the old site five years ago... but I think now that it's just easier to rely on having a large number of volunteers. [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 07:57, 11 April 2006 (CDT)

M. Lucretius Agricola: More workthis way? Or not?

2006-04-11T11:13:26Z

More workthis way? Or not?

New page

Is it really a good idea to make this here? It seems to me that this is the sort of thing that the old database-driven site is good at. We could make this table THERE, generating it automagically from a "lictor" flag. We could alter the scripts to point things at the wiki if we want to. Aren't we making more work ofr ourselves if we put this here? Of course, if Mediawiki can generate this automatically then ignore the above... {{M. Lucretius Agricola}}