User talk:Aulus Apollonius Cordus - Revision history

M. Lucretius Agricola: Category talk:Senatus consulta (Nova Roma)

2007-09-16T04:07:26Z

Category talk:Senatus consulta (Nova Roma)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:07, 16 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Senatus consulta==
		+
		+	Please see discussion at [[Category talk:Senatus consulta (Nova Roma)]] and add your views. Thx [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 06:07, 16 September 2007 (CEST)
		+
	==Templates==		==Templates==

Line 71:		Line 75:

	I think there's enough now in the Fimbria article for the reader to at least have an idea what the issues were and how it could have become so divisive as time progressed. I won't be up to any more major work on it for a while. However, I am gathering the more readily-available of my sources as time permits and assembling them on a "toy Wiki" that one of our ''sodales'', P Nonius Severus, put together last year for other purposes. Anyone who wants a sneak-peek can find my raw materials and rough drafts at [http://editthis.info/ancient_ways/Talk:Fimbria_Controversies_%28draft%29 Ancient Ways: Talk:Fimbria Controversies (draft)] and [http://editthis.info/ancient_ways/More_raw_material Ancient Ways: More raw material]. -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 21:12, 25 August 2007 (CEST)		I think there's enough now in the Fimbria article for the reader to at least have an idea what the issues were and how it could have become so divisive as time progressed. I won't be up to any more major work on it for a while. However, I am gathering the more readily-available of my sources as time permits and assembling them on a "toy Wiki" that one of our ''sodales'', P Nonius Severus, put together last year for other purposes. Anyone who wants a sneak-peek can find my raw materials and rough drafts at [http://editthis.info/ancient_ways/Talk:Fimbria_Controversies_%28draft%29 Ancient Ways: Talk:Fimbria Controversies (draft)] and [http://editthis.info/ancient_ways/More_raw_material Ancient Ways: More raw material]. -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 21:12, 25 August 2007 (CEST)
		+	[[Media:'''Example.ogg''']]

M. Lucretius Agricola: templates

2007-09-11T00:41:02Z

templates

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:41, 11 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Templates==
		+
		+	Big template creation jobs (like lots of year templates) can be automated. Also, see my note at [[:Category:Year templates]]. Peregrinus noticed this problem. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 02:41, 11 September 2007 (CEST)
		+
	Salve Corde! I think you have this page on "watch" status by default. That means you'll get a notice if I save anything here. - {{M. Lucretius Agricola}}		Salve Corde! I think you have this page on "watch" status by default. That means you'll get a notice if I save anything here. - {{M. Lucretius Agricola}}

Aldus Marius Peregrinus: create cat?

2007-08-27T21:09:03Z

create cat?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 27 August 2007
Line 55:		Line 55:

	*Just found: the issue of the Nova Roma ''Eagle'' (2000, No. IV) in which D Iunius Palladius (editor at the time) and L Cornelius Sulla (The Censor) give their (somewhat biased) descriptions of the incident. Are back issues of the ''Eagle'' available on the site? If not, shall I read this one into the record, as they say in Congress? -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 22:27, 14 August 2007 (CEST)		*Just found: the issue of the Nova Roma ''Eagle'' (2000, No. IV) in which D Iunius Palladius (editor at the time) and L Cornelius Sulla (The Censor) give their (somewhat biased) descriptions of the incident. Are back issues of the ''Eagle'' available on the site? If not, shall I read this one into the record, as they say in Congress? -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 22:27, 14 August 2007 (CEST)
		+
		+	I've just "read into the record" the entirety of [[Nova Roma Eagle, issue IV, 2000]], plus a relevant excerpt from [[From Nova Roma Eagle, issue III, 2000\|issue III]], and notes on that year's ''Eagles'' in general.
		+
		+	More fun: a page just for the [[Chatroom precedent\|"chatroom precedent"]] cited by all subsequent ''censores'' as justification for denying Marius' name-change request, with quotes from the appropriate ''Eagles''.
		+
		+	I'm working on linking everything to each other. Considering the number of new pages that will likely be needed to hold all my primary refs, should I maybe create a Category for ''"rixa Fimbriana"'' material? -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 23:09, 27 August 2007 (CEST)

	===Absentia===		===Absentia===

Aldus Marius Peregrinus: Absentia

2007-08-25T19:12:30Z

Absentia

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:12, 25 August 2007
Line 55:		Line 55:

	*Just found: the issue of the Nova Roma ''Eagle'' (2000, No. IV) in which D Iunius Palladius (editor at the time) and L Cornelius Sulla (The Censor) give their (somewhat biased) descriptions of the incident. Are back issues of the ''Eagle'' available on the site? If not, shall I read this one into the record, as they say in Congress? -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 22:27, 14 August 2007 (CEST)		*Just found: the issue of the Nova Roma ''Eagle'' (2000, No. IV) in which D Iunius Palladius (editor at the time) and L Cornelius Sulla (The Censor) give their (somewhat biased) descriptions of the incident. Are back issues of the ''Eagle'' available on the site? If not, shall I read this one into the record, as they say in Congress? -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 22:27, 14 August 2007 (CEST)
		+
		+	===Absentia===
		+
		+	I am going in for surgery in mid-September. My life for the next few weeks, as for the last few months, will consist chiefly of preparation for this event. I will be basically unavailable (for at least a few months) after the end of August.
		+
		+	I think there's enough now in the Fimbria article for the reader to at least have an idea what the issues were and how it could have become so divisive as time progressed. I won't be up to any more major work on it for a while. However, I am gathering the more readily-available of my sources as time permits and assembling them on a "toy Wiki" that one of our ''sodales'', P Nonius Severus, put together last year for other purposes. Anyone who wants a sneak-peek can find my raw materials and rough drafts at [http://editthis.info/ancient_ways/Talk:Fimbria_Controversies_%28draft%29 Ancient Ways: Talk:Fimbria Controversies (draft)] and [http://editthis.info/ancient_ways/More_raw_material Ancient Ways: More raw material]. -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 21:12, 25 August 2007 (CEST)

Aldus Marius Peregrinus: Found: Eagle articles

2007-08-14T20:27:39Z

Found: Eagle articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 14 August 2007
Line 53:		Line 53:

	I do have some interesting texts on other matters: an early Album Civium listing the *tresfamiliae; the original Interregnum notice and some associated correspondence; a proposed Statement of Religious Tolerance. There'll be very much more once I retrieve my NR mail from my ancient laptop. -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 10:26, 13 August 2007 (CEST)		I do have some interesting texts on other matters: an early Album Civium listing the *tresfamiliae; the original Interregnum notice and some associated correspondence; a proposed Statement of Religious Tolerance. There'll be very much more once I retrieve my NR mail from my ancient laptop. -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 10:26, 13 August 2007 (CEST)
		+
		+	*Just found: the issue of the Nova Roma ''Eagle'' (2000, No. IV) in which D Iunius Palladius (editor at the time) and L Cornelius Sulla (The Censor) give their (somewhat biased) descriptions of the incident. Are back issues of the ''Eagle'' available on the site? If not, shall I read this one into the record, as they say in Congress? -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 22:27, 14 August 2007 (CEST)

Aldus Marius Peregrinus: use of sources?

2007-08-13T08:26:46Z

use of sources?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:26, 13 August 2007
Line 47:		Line 47:

	How'm I doing on it so far...? >({(:-) -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 23:40, 4 August 2007 (CEST)		How'm I doing on it so far...? >({(:-) -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 23:40, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
		+
		+	===Sources?===
		+
		+	I'm asking Lucretius Agricola this too: I've located my printed records. Most of the material, I believe, is public domain (''leges,'' Forum posts, List messages and such). However, some of it consists of private e-mails and chatroom transcripts. What is the policy (do we have one?) on the use of such material as primary sources? If I sent the message, may I use it? If I was the recipient, would I need to obtain the sender's permission? What about partial quotes, as are usually included in a reply?
		+
		+	I do have some interesting texts on other matters: an early Album Civium listing the *tresfamiliae; the original Interregnum notice and some associated correspondence; a proposed Statement of Religious Tolerance. There'll be very much more once I retrieve my NR mail from my ancient laptop. -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 10:26, 13 August 2007 (CEST)

Aldus Marius Peregrinus: Article on Fimbria affair

2007-08-04T21:40:47Z

Article on Fimbria affair

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 4 August 2007
Line 43:		Line 43:

	I fixed one ''relatio'' link in [[Senate procedures]], see [[Talk:Senate procedures]]. [[User:M Octavius Gracchus\|Marcus Octavius Gracchus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 20:22, 24 October 2006 (CDT)		I fixed one ''relatio'' link in [[Senate procedures]], see [[Talk:Senate procedures]]. [[User:M Octavius Gracchus\|Marcus Octavius Gracchus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 20:22, 24 October 2006 (CDT)
		+
		+	==Article on Fimbria incident==
		+
		+	How'm I doing on it so far...? >({(:-) -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus\|Marius Peregrinus]] 23:40, 4 August 2007 (CEST)

Marcus Octavius Gracchus: internal link

2006-10-25T01:22:07Z

internal link

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:22, 25 October 2006
Line 39:		Line 39:
	-- [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 07:39, 19 April 2006 (CDT)		-- [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 07:39, 19 April 2006 (CDT)
	:Some of those are misleding unless used carefully. For example, some "Lonely" pages are in categories. For the reading lists that will probably be enough. They MAY become linked to directly with time, but as long as they are in categories they should not be made a linking priority. Some time ago I put the categories into hierarchies. At that time the only uncategorized category was the top one. I'll look at that again when I have a bit of time. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 07:50, 19 April 2006 (CDT)		:Some of those are misleding unless used carefully. For example, some "Lonely" pages are in categories. For the reading lists that will probably be enough. They MAY become linked to directly with time, but as long as they are in categories they should not be made a linking priority. Some time ago I put the categories into hierarchies. At that time the only uncategorized category was the top one. I'll look at that again when I have a bit of time. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 07:50, 19 April 2006 (CDT)
		+
		+	== internal link ==
		+
		+	I fixed one ''relatio'' link in [[Senate procedures]], see [[Talk:Senate procedures]]. [[User:M Octavius Gracchus\|Marcus Octavius Gracchus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 20:22, 24 October 2006 (CDT)

M. Lucretius Agricola: /* where? */ about not so lonely pages

2006-04-19T12:50:03Z

where?: about not so lonely pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 19 April 2006
Line 38:		Line 38:
	Eventually, we should have some sort of hierarchical site map, so there's an easy way to get to everything.		Eventually, we should have some sort of hierarchical site map, so there's an easy way to get to everything.
	-- [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 07:39, 19 April 2006 (CDT)		-- [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 07:39, 19 April 2006 (CDT)
		+	:Some of those are misleding unless used carefully. For example, some "Lonely" pages are in categories. For the reading lists that will probably be enough. They MAY become linked to directly with time, but as long as they are in categories they should not be made a linking priority. Some time ago I put the categories into hierarchies. At that time the only uncategorized category was the top one. I'll look at that again when I have a bit of time. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 07:50, 19 April 2006 (CDT)

Marcus Octavius Gracchus: /* where? */ edit again to take 'm' flag off, sorry.

2006-04-19T12:39:16Z

where?: edit again to take 'm' flag off, sorry.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:39, 19 April 2006
Line 37:		Line 37:

	Eventually, we should have some sort of hierarchical site map, so there's an easy way to get to everything.		Eventually, we should have some sort of hierarchical site map, so there's an easy way to get to everything.
−	[[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 07:37, 19 April 2006 (CDT)	+	-- [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus\|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 07:39, 19 April 2006 (CDT)