User talk:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus - Revision history

Decimus Aurelius Ingeniarius: Added HP tag

2024-06-28T12:18:48Z

Added HP tag

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:18, 28 June 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{HistoricalDocument}}
	{{Template:Key Path Task Force}}		{{Template:Key Path Task Force}}
	{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}		{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}

Annia Minucia Marcella at 12:44, 13 March 2011

2011-03-13T12:44:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 13 March 2011
Line 127:		Line 127:
	I think that for the official consular years, in our Web Site we have to write the whole names of each consul. In private, we can use or not the rule you said, when one consul is noble.		I think that for the official consular years, in our Web Site we have to write the whole names of each consul. In private, we can use or not the rule you said, when one consul is noble.
	[[User:Gaius Petronius Dexter\|C·Petronius Dexter]]		[[User:Gaius Petronius Dexter\|C·Petronius Dexter]]
		+
		+	==Sulla's Page==
		+	Aww, you don't like my improvements? Was I in error with the information? You can check the senate archives if you're unsure.--[[User:Annia Minucia Marcella\|Annia_Minucia_Marcella]] 13:44, 13 March 2011 (CET)

Gaius Petronius Dexter at 00:08, 30 November 2010

2010-11-30T00:08:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:08, 30 November 2010
Line 122:		Line 122:

	Please take a look at [[Template talk:Calendar articles]]; your thoughts would be appreciated. ''[[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q Caecilius Metellus Postumianus]] 00:59, 15 May 2010 (CEST)''		Please take a look at [[Template talk:Calendar articles]]; your thoughts would be appreciated. ''[[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q Caecilius Metellus Postumianus]] 00:59, 15 May 2010 (CEST)''
		+
		+	== Consular years ==
		+
		+	I think that for the official consular years, in our Web Site we have to write the whole names of each consul. In private, we can use or not the rule you said, when one consul is noble.
		+	[[User:Gaius Petronius Dexter\|C·Petronius Dexter]]

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus: Calendar articles

2010-05-14T22:59:28Z

Calendar articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 14 May 2010
Line 118:		Line 118:

	[[Spelt]] or emmer? I think emmer, actually. It is made difficult by the many vernacular terms in our many languages. /\⁄\ \|_ ⁄·\ 23:32, 15 January 2010 (CET)		[[Spelt]] or emmer? I think emmer, actually. It is made difficult by the many vernacular terms in our many languages. /\⁄\ \|_ ⁄·\ 23:32, 15 January 2010 (CET)
		+
		+	== Calendar articles ==
		+
		+	Please take a look at [[Template talk:Calendar articles]]; your thoughts would be appreciated. ''[[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q Caecilius Metellus Postumianus]] 00:59, 15 May 2010 (CEST)''

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus: /* NovaRoma:WikiMagisters */ addition to previous comment

2010-04-26T03:54:13Z

NovaRoma:WikiMagisters: addition to previous comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:54, 26 April 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:

	With this page being locked, I have to ask you to update it. Of the five magistri, only T Octavius remains a sysop while T Iulius is now a bureaucrat; the two bureaucrats listed are currently so, but it is short by three people: C Curius, T Iulius, and yourself. cf. [[Special:Listusers]]. Gratias tibi ago. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q Caecilius Metellus Postumianus]] 18:30, 25 April 2010 (CEST)		With this page being locked, I have to ask you to update it. Of the five magistri, only T Octavius remains a sysop while T Iulius is now a bureaucrat; the two bureaucrats listed are currently so, but it is short by three people: C Curius, T Iulius, and yourself. cf. [[Special:Listusers]]. Gratias tibi ago. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q Caecilius Metellus Postumianus]] 18:30, 25 April 2010 (CEST)
		+	: To add to this, I am happy to assist as a Magister, if you choose. Somehow, I neglected to mention that yesterday. :) [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q Caecilius Metellus Postumianus]] 05:54, 26 April 2010 (CEST)

	==Neptunus article==		==Neptunus article==

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus: request

2010-04-25T16:30:06Z

request

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 25 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Template:Key Path Task Force}}		{{Template:Key Path Task Force}}
	{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}		{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}
		+
		+	==[[NovaRoma:WikiMagisters]]==
		+
		+	With this page being locked, I have to ask you to update it. Of the five magistri, only T Octavius remains a sysop while T Iulius is now a bureaucrat; the two bureaucrats listed are currently so, but it is short by three people: C Curius, T Iulius, and yourself. cf. [[Special:Listusers]]. Gratias tibi ago. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q Caecilius Metellus Postumianus]] 18:30, 25 April 2010 (CEST)

	==Neptunus article==		==Neptunus article==

Marca Hortensia Maior at 19:27, 15 April 2010

2010-04-15T19:27:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 15 April 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:

	==Neptunus article==		==Neptunus article==
−	Cato rewrote the article with old, dated material material, Lentule can you give us the article after your last edit & without Cato's edits? There is really wrong info there...I'd read the latest study in Italian on this cultus...[[User:Marca Hortensia Maior\|Marca Hortensia Maior]]	+	Cato rewrote the article with old, dated material material, Lentule can you give us the article after your last edit & without Cato's edits? There is really wrong info there...I'd read the latest study in Italian on this cultus...[[User:Marca Hortensia Maior\|Marca Hortensia Maior]]

Marca Hortensia Maior: /* Copyright Expiration */

2010-04-15T19:26:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 15 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Template:Key Path Task Force}}		{{Template:Key Path Task Force}}
	{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}		{{Cultus Task Force\|Member}}
		+
		+	==Neptunus article==
		+	Cato rewrote the article with old, dated material material, Lentule can you give us the article after your last edit & without Cato's edits? There is really wrong info there...I'd read the latest study in Italian on this cultus...[[User:Marca Hortensia Maior\|Marca Hortensia Maior]]
		+

	==Copyright Expiration==		==Copyright Expiration==
	Lentulus has the copyright for the Crapsey book expired? In the U.S it is the writer's life plus 70 years. What about Europe? Also Cato's articles need citations and are his photos ok? Meaning I upload mine via persmission of the Vroma archive.....		Lentulus has the copyright for the Crapsey book expired? In the U.S it is the writer's life plus 70 years. What about Europe? Also Cato's articles need citations and are his photos ok? Meaning I upload mine via persmission of the Vroma archive.....
−

	==Source for image?==		==Source for image?==

M. Lucretius Agricola: spelt or emmer

2010-01-15T22:32:01Z

spelt or emmer

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, 15 January 2010
Line 106:		Line 106:

	Amice, I don't know if you saw, but some months ago I posted to [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NRWiki the NRWiki mailing list] some thoughts on the [[NovaRoma:Style Guide\|style guide]], since it hadn't been discussed in years. If you could review my comments there, as well as the examples I put in [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus/Sandbox\|my sandbox]], I think it could really help in keeping up academic quality and professionalism in the wiki. Plurimas gratias ago! -- [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 02:44, 4 November 2009 (CET)		Amice, I don't know if you saw, but some months ago I posted to [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NRWiki the NRWiki mailing list] some thoughts on the [[NovaRoma:Style Guide\|style guide]], since it hadn't been discussed in years. If you could review my comments there, as well as the examples I put in [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus/Sandbox\|my sandbox]], I think it could really help in keeping up academic quality and professionalism in the wiki. Plurimas gratias ago! -- [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 02:44, 4 November 2009 (CET)
		+
		+	==[[Mola salsa]]==
		+
		+	[[Spelt]] or emmer? I think emmer, actually. It is made difficult by the many vernacular terms in our many languages. /\⁄\ \|_ ⁄·\ 23:32, 15 January 2010 (CET)

Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus: Style Guide

2009-11-04T01:44:39Z

Style Guide

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 4 November 2009
Line 102:		Line 102:

	Salve Lentule, Looking over the delete requests, I see sometimes a MOVE would have been better than creating a new page and deleting the old one. For example, "Fasti Censorii (Nova Roma)" should have been moved to "Fasti censorii (Nova Roma)". When you use delete and create, you also lose all of the old page history. If you can't do the move yourself, just contact me and I will do it. That is far simpler than using deletes. Also, a MOVE automatically leaves behind a redirect from the old title to the new one, so that links are not broken. I sometimes go through the redirects to fix the double redirects, but that is little trouble. Many thanks! [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 07:22, 29 October 2008 (CET)		Salve Lentule, Looking over the delete requests, I see sometimes a MOVE would have been better than creating a new page and deleting the old one. For example, "Fasti Censorii (Nova Roma)" should have been moved to "Fasti censorii (Nova Roma)". When you use delete and create, you also lose all of the old page history. If you can't do the move yourself, just contact me and I will do it. That is far simpler than using deletes. Also, a MOVE automatically leaves behind a redirect from the old title to the new one, so that links are not broken. I sometimes go through the redirects to fix the double redirects, but that is little trouble. Many thanks! [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 07:22, 29 October 2008 (CET)
		+
		+	== Style Guide ==
		+
		+	Amice, I don't know if you saw, but some months ago I posted to [http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NRWiki the NRWiki mailing list] some thoughts on the [[NovaRoma:Style Guide\|style guide]], since it hadn't been discussed in years. If you could review my comments there, as well as the examples I put in [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus/Sandbox\|my sandbox]], I think it could really help in keeping up academic quality and professionalism in the wiki. Plurimas gratias ago! -- [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus\|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 02:44, 4 November 2009 (CET)