Session LXIX 14 February 2759

From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="scriptum">
 
  
 
+
Tribunus Plebis '''Marcus Arminius Maior''' Quiritibus SPD
{{Senate Session|Feb|14|2006}}
+
 
+
Tribunus Plebis Marcus Arminius Maior Quiritibus SPD
+
  
  
 
Senate Voting Results, published on a.d. XVI Kal. Martias MMDCCLIX
 
Senate Voting Results, published on a.d. XVI Kal. Martias MMDCCLIX
A.U.C., or 14 February 2006 AD.
+
A.U.C., or '''14 February 2006''' AD.
  
 
In 13th of February, the latest session of the Senate of Nova Roma
 
In 13th of February, the latest session of the Senate of Nova Roma
Line 21: Line 17:
 
the amendments can change our Constitution.
 
the amendments can change our Constitution.
  
Here are the list of the voting Senators, alphabetically listed by
+
Here are the list of the '''33''' voting Senators, alphabetically listed by
 
nomen:
 
nomen:
  
Line 58: Line 54:
 
*[FVG] Flavius Vedius Germanicus
 
*[FVG] Flavius Vedius Germanicus
  
The following senatores failed to vote in this session:
+
The following '''5''' senatores failed to vote in this session:
 
*[LAF] Lucius Arminius Faustus
 
*[LAF] Lucius Arminius Faustus
 
*[MCJ] Marcus Cassius Julianus
 
*[MCJ] Marcus Cassius Julianus
Line 68: Line 64:
 
The items for consideration were as follows:
 
The items for consideration were as follows:
  
ITEM I: Approval of Marcus Iulius Severus as an Interpreter of
 
Spanish and French.
 
  
*[MAGG] VTI ROGAS
 
*[SAS] uti rogas.
 
*[FAC] VTI ROGAS.
 
*[MAM] Uti Rogas.
 
*[MBA] Uti Rogas.
 
*[PC] Uti Rogas.
 
*[MCS] VTI ROGAS
 
*[CCS] Uti Rogas.
 
*[ECF] Uti Rogas.
 
*[GEM] VTI ROGAS
 
*[LECA] Vti Rogas
 
*[GFBM] Uti Rogas.
 
*[CFBQ] Uti Rogas.
 
*[QFM] VTI ROGAS
 
*[CFD] Uti Rogas
 
*[TGP] VTI ROGAS
 
*[MIP] VTI ROGAS
 
*[DIPI] Uti Rogas.
 
*[TLF] UTI ROGAS
 
*[LMS] VTI•ROGAS
 
*[MMA] YES
 
*[GMHF] Uti Rogas.
 
*[PMS] Uti Rogas.
 
*[AMA] VTI ROGAS
 
*[MOG] uti rogas.
 
*[TOPA] Uti rogas.
 
*[GPL] Uti Rogas.
 
*[GSA] VTI ROGAS.
 
*[JSM] VTI ROGAS
 
*[LSA] Uti rogas
 
*[QSP] uti rogas.
 
*[ATMC] Uti Rogas
 
*[FVG] Uti Rogas.
 
  
Results of Item I: Uti Rogas, 33 ; Antiquo, 0 ; Abstineo, 0.
+
==ITEM I: Approval of Marcus Iulius Severus as an Interpreter of Spanish and French==
The item passed unanimously.
+
<br>
Congratulations, Marcus Iulius Severus, Interpreter of Nova Roma.
+
 
 +
===Results===
 +
 
 +
UR: 33 ; ABS: 0, ANT: 0: the item has '''passed'''.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===Votes and opinions===
 +
 
 +
All UR.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==ITEM II: Approval of Publius Constantinus Placidus as an Interpreter of Italian==
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
===Results===
 +
 
 +
UR: 33 ; ABS: 0, ANT: 0: the item has '''passed'''.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===Votes and opinions===
 +
 
 +
The following senators have issued the following commentaries: Senator FAC has declared about Placidus: "I know him directly, a very skilled citizen".
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==ITEM III: Approval of Aulus Horatius Severus as Interpreter of Portuguese==
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
===Results===
 +
 
 +
UR: 33 ; ABS: 0, ANT: 0: the item has '''passed'''.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===Votes and opinions===
 +
 
 +
The following senators have issued the following commentaries:
 +
*[CFBQ] Uti Rogas. I am very grateful that these three gentlemen are prepared to give their time to the Res Publica!
 +
*[GMHF] Uti Rogas. I'd like to offer my thanks to these three individuals for offering their services to NR as Interpreters. It is a difficult, and I suspect sometimes thankless task that is vital for the functioning of our
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==ITEM IV: Approval of the constitutional amendment #1 from December 2005 Comitia centuriata==
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
===Results===
 +
 
 +
UR: 13 ; ABS: 9 (MAGG, MBA, GEM, MIP, LMS, AMA, GPL, GSA, JSM), ANT (LECA, QFM, CFD, TGP, DIPI, TLF, GMHF, MMA, MOG, LSA, QSP) : 11: the item has '''failed''': a constitutional amendment needed 2/3 of the whole Curia's votes, so 26 votes to be approved, and received only 14.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===Votes and opinions===
 +
 
 +
The following senators have issued the following commentaries:
 +
*[FAC]: UR: The amendment gives us more possibilities to change the law.
 +
*[GEM]: ABS. This amendment was put forth as part of an attempt to rectify the problem we had with a tribunician resignation last year. However, its original sponsors have not promoted it during this session of the Senate, and I'm left wondering if they still support it.
 +
*[LECA] ANT. This amendment would accomplish nothing.
 +
*[CFBQ] UR: Now the only thing we need to do is to change the law.
 +
*[QFM] ANT. Gentlemen, as written, this implies that we can change the law about a legally valid resignation. Since this allows the rewriting the law & reasons every time we have a new consul, this accomplishes nothing.
 +
*[TGP] ANT. The current standard is higher and should remain in place.
 +
*[GMHF] ANT. The change strikes me as unnecessary.
 +
*[MOG] ANTIQUO. The amendment accomplishes nothing; it complicates the text needlessly. You could similarly add "legally valid" before almost every noun in the Constitution - what's the point? If a registration isn't "legally valid", then it isn't a resignation, so that part of the Constitution would not apply. There is no need to restate the obvious. Furthermore, having "legally valid" and "as defined by pursuant law" is redundant - what else would "legally valid" be defined by?
 +
*[QSP] ANTIQUO. I agree that the text is better and less complicated as it stands now.
  
  
ITEM II: Approval of Publius Constantinus Placidus as an Interpreter
 
of Italian.
 
  
*[MAGG] VTI ROGAS
+
==ITEM V: Approval of the constitutional amendment #2 from December 2005 Comitia centuriata==
*[SAS] uti rogas.
+
<br>
*[FAC] VTI ROGAS. I know him directly, a very skilled citizen.
+
*[MAM] Uti Rogas.
+
*[MBA] Uti Rogas.
+
*[PC] Uti Rogas.
+
*[MCS] VTI ROGAS
+
*[CCS] Uti Rogas.
+
*[ECF] Uti Rogas.
+
*[GEM] VTI ROGAS
+
*[LECA] Vti Rogas
+
*[GFBM] Uti Rogas.
+
*[CFBQ] Uti Rogas.
+
*[QFM] VTI ROGAS
+
*[CFD] Uti Rogas
+
*[TGP] VTI ROGAS
+
*[MIP] VTI ROGAS
+
*[DIPI] Uti Rogas.
+
*[TLF] UTI ROGAS
+
*[LMS] VTI•ROGAS
+
*[MMA] YES
+
*[GMHF] Uti Rogas.
+
*[PMS] Uti Rogas.
+
*[AMA] VTI ROGAS
+
*[MOG] uti rogas.
+
*[TOPA] Uti rogas.
+
*[GPL] Uti Rogas.
+
*[GSA] VTI ROGAS.
+
*[JSM] VTI ROGAS
+
*[LSA] Uti rogas
+
*[QSP] uti rogas.
+
*[ATMC] Uti Rogas
+
*[FVG] Uti Rogas.
+
  
Results of Item II: Uti Rogas, 33 ; Antiquo, 0 ; Abstineo, 0.
+
===Results===
The item passed unanimously. Congratulations, Publius Constantinus Placidius, Interpreter of Nova Roma.
+
  
 +
UR: 12 ; ABS: 16 (MBA, PC, CCS, ECF, LECA, CFBQ, MIP, DIPI, TLF, LMS, PMS, AMA, TOPA, GPL, GSA, JSM), ANT (LSA, QFM, CFD, TGP, FVG) : 5: the item has '''failed''': a constitutional amendment needed 2/3 of the whole Curia's votes, so 26 votes to be approved, and received only 12.
  
ITEM III: Approval of Aulus Horatius Severus as Interpreter of
 
Portuguese.
 
  
*[MAGG] VTI ROGAS
+
===Votes and opinions===
*[SAS] uti rogas.
+
*[FAC] VTI ROGAS
+
*[MAM] Uti Rogas.
+
*[MBA] Uti Rogas.
+
*[PC] Uti Rogas.
+
*[MCS] VTI ROGAS
+
*[CCS] Uti Rogas.
+
*[ECF] Uti Rogas.
+
*[GEM] VTI ROGAS
+
*[LECA] Vti Rogas
+
*[GFBM] Uti Rogas.
+
*[CFBQ] Uti Rogas. I am very grateful that these three gentlemen are prepared to
+
give their time to the Res Publica!
+
*[QFM] VTI ROGAS
+
*[CFD] Uti Rogas
+
*[TGP] VTI ROGAS
+
*[MIP] VTI ROGAS
+
*[DIPI] Uti Rogas.
+
*[TLF] UTI ROGAS
+
*[LMS] VTI•ROGAS
+
*[MMA] YES
+
*[GMHF] Uti Rogas. I'd like to offer my thanks to these three individuals for
+
offering their services to NR as Interpreters. It is a difficult, and
+
I suspect sometimes thankless task that is vital for the functioning
+
of our Res Public as an international organization.
+
*[PMS] Uti Rogas.
+
*[AMA] VTI ROGAS
+
*[MOG] uti rogas.
+
*[TOPA] Uti rogas.
+
*[GPL] Uti Rogas.
+
*[GSA] VTI ROGAS.
+
*[JSM] VTI ROGAS
+
*[LSA] Uti rogas
+
*[QSP] uti rogas.
+
*[ATMC] Uti Rogas
+
*[FVG] Uti Rogas.
+
  
Results of Item III: Uti Rogas, 33 ; Antiquo, 0 ; Abstineo, 0.
+
The following senators have issued the following commentaries:
The item passed unanimously. Congratulations, Aulus Horatius Severus,  
+
*FAC: UR. I think it would quite uncomfortable to by-pass what the Comitia approved in the last December and I don't see any problem with thisproposal.
Interpreter of Nova Roma.
+
*GEM: UR. This amendment will significantly ease the duties of the webmaster, moving us away from a past policy and supporting our established policy of basing assignment in the rural tribes on assidui status.
 +
*CFBQ: ABS. The reason we make this change is that some of us want to prepare a Constitutional change that I am not sure I agree with. Let us do it the right way instead, let us discuss the Constitutional change first.
 +
*QFM: ANT. Call me conservative. But every time we change something more problems appear.
 +
*PMS: ABS. After some thought, and entertaining the wisdom of those of this august body who offered their views, I too, would like to take a more comprehensive look at the full ramifications of this.
 +
*MOG: UR. A sensible change, and one that eliminates some 'paperwork'.
 +
*TOPA: ABS. The amendment implicates some further changes I am unwilling to support. I believe Nova Roma needs full-time Censors and our current system with overlapping two-year terms doesn't need fixing.
 +
*QSP: UR. A good change and it looks easier to manage on the paper work end.
  
  
ITEM IV: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #1 from December 2005
 
Comitia Centuriata.
 
  
*[MAGG] ABSTINEO
+
==ITEM VI: Grant of permission to citizen Caius Curius Saturninus to use the Nova Roma logo, and text of "The Official Nova Roma Calendar" in a printed Roman wall calendar for 2006 and 2007==
*[SAS] uti rogas.
+
<br>
*[FAC] VTI ROGAS.
+
The amendment gives us more possibilities to change the law.
+
*[MAM] Uti Rogas.
+
*[MBA] ABSTINEO
+
*[PC] Uti Rogas.
+
*[MCS] VTI ROGAS
+
*[CCS] Uti Rogas
+
*[ECF] Uti Rogas.
+
*[GEM] ABSTO This amendment was put forth as part of an attempt to rectify
+
the problem we had with a tribunician resignation last year. However, its
+
original sponsors have not promoted it during this session of the
+
Senate, and I'm left wondering if they still support it.
+
*[LECA] ANTIQUO. This amendment would accomplish nothing.
+
*[GFBM] Uti Rogas.
+
*[CFBQ] Uti Rogas. Now the only thing we need to do is to change the law.
+
*[QFM] ANTIQVO. Gentlemen, as written, this implies that we can change the law
+
about a legally valid resignation. Since this allows the rewriting
+
the law & reasons every time we have a new consul, this accomplishes
+
nothing.
+
*[CFD] Antiquo
+
*[TGP] ANTIQUO. The current standard is higher and should remain in place.
+
*[MIP] ABSTINEO
+
*[DIPI] Antiquo
+
*[TLF] ANTIQUO
+
*[LMS] ABSTINEO
+
*[MMA] NO
+
*[GMHF] Antiquo. The change strikes me as unnecessary.
+
*[PMS] Uti Rogas
+
*[AMA] ABSTINEO
+
*[MOG] ANTIQUO.
+
The amendment accomplishes nothing; it complicates the text
+
needlessly. You could similarly add "legally valid" before almost
+
every noun in the Constitution - what's the point? If a registration
+
isn't "legally valid", then it isn't a resignation, so that part of
+
the Constitution would not apply. There is no need to restate the
+
obvious. Furthermore, having "legally valid" and "as defined by
+
pursuant law" is redundant - what else would "legally valid" be
+
defined by?
+
*[TOPA] Uti rogas.
+
*[GPL] Abstineo.
+
*[GSA] ABSTINEO
+
*[JSM] ABSTINEO
+
*[LSA] Antiquo
+
*[QSP] ANTIQUO. I agree that the text is better and less complicated as it
+
stands now.
+
*[ATMC] Uti Rogas
+
*[FVG] Uti Rogas.
+
  
Results of Item IV: Uti Rogas, 13 ; Antiquo, 11 ; Abstineo, 9.
+
===Results===
The item failed. A constitutional amendment needed 26 votes to be
+
approved, and received only 13.
+
  
 +
UR: 32 ; ABS: 1 (MMA), ANT: 0: the item has '''passed'''.
  
ITEM V: Approval of Constitutional Amendment #2 from December 2005
 
Comitia Centuriata.
 
  
*[MAGG] VTI ROGAS
+
===Votes and opinions===
*[SAS] uti rogas.
+
*[FAC] VTI ROGAS.
+
I think it would quite uncomfortable to by-pass what the Comitia
+
approved in the last December and I don't see any problem with this
+
proposal.
+
*[MAM] Uti Rogas.
+
*[MBA] ABSTINEO
+
*[PC] Abstineo.
+
*[MCS] VTI ROGAS
+
*[CCS] Abstineo
+
*[ECF] Abstineo.
+
*[GEM] VTI ROGAS.
+
This amendment will significantly ease the duties of the
+
webmaster, moving us away from a past policy and supporting our
+
established policy of basing assignment in the rural tribes on
+
assidui status.
+
*[LECA] Absto
+
*[GFBM] Uti Rogas.
+
*[CFBQ] Abstineo.
+
The reason we make this change is that some of us want to
+
prepare a Constitutional change that I am not sure I agree with. Let us do it
+
the right way instead, let us discuss the Constitutional change first.
+
*[QFM] ANTIQVO.
+
Call me conservative. But every time we change something more
+
problems appear.
+
*[CFD] Antiquo
+
*[TGP] ANTIQUO.
+
*[MIP] ABSTINEO
+
*[DIPI] Abstineo.
+
*[TLF] ABSTINEO
+
*[LMS] ABSTINEO
+
*[MMA] YES
+
*[GMHF] Uti Rogas.
+
*[PMS] Abstain
+
After some thought, and entertaining the wisdom of those of this
+
august body who offered their views, I too, would like to take a more
+
comprehensive look at the full ramifications of this.
+
*[AMA] ABSTINEO
+
*[MOG] uti rogas A sensible change, and one that eliminates some 'paperwork'.
+
*[TOPA] Abstineo. The amendment implicates some further changes I am unwilling to
+
support. I believe Nova Roma needs full-time Censors and our current
+
system with overlapping two-year terms doesn't need fixing.
+
*[GPL] Abstineo.
+
*[GSA] ABSTINEO
+
*[JSM] ABSTINEO
+
*[LSA] Antiquo
+
*[QSP] uti rogas A good change and it looks easier to manage on the paper work
+
end.
+
*[ATMC] Uti Rogas
+
*[FVG] Antiquo.
+
  
Results of Item V: Uti Rogas, 12 ; Antiquo, 5 ; Abstineo, 16.
+
The following senators have issued the following commentaries:
The item failed. A constitutional amendment needed 26 votes to be
+
*SAS: UR. I got two calendars myself. This is just great.
approved, and received only 12.
+
*FAC: UR. Wonderful calendar.
 +
*MCS: UR. Congratulations for the calendar! The Calendar is beautiful, I bought one to myself and a couple
 +
more to give away. This is a splendid initiative, well worth our support!
 +
*QFM: UR. I hope this is a successful venture for Curius.
 +
*LMS: UR. In Hispania we made a Wall Calendar for 2758 A•V•C that was an example for some students and scholars. This idea is quite good and deserves to be backed from here.
 +
*MMA: Abstain. For those who have a problem with this decision, it means to me that I am unwilling to cast either a NO or YES vote to this measure. My reasoning in this matter I should be glad to share with anyone interested on a personal basis.
 +
*GMHF: UR. Good initiative!
 +
*MOG: UR. This is exactly the sort of initiative we should see more of.
 +
*TOPA: UR. Caius Curius Saturninus continually displays great initiative, and I applaud him for it.
 +
*QSP: UR. A great idea and an educational tool that will provoke many questions when displayed in a home or office.
 +
*ATMC: UR. I would love to get a couple of these.
  
  
 +
==ITEM VII: Elysium gathering shall be officially co-sponsored by Nova Roma==
 +
<br>
  
 +
===Proposal===
  
 +
Elysium gathering (September 21, 2006 until September 24, 200-6), an event in Ohio, shall be officially co-sponsored by Nova Roma. Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, the event coordinator of Elysium Gathering, shall be the contact person between the event and Nova Roma.
  
ITEM VI: Grant of permission to citizen Caius Curius Saturninus to
+
===Results===
use the Nova Roma logo, and text of "The Official Nova Roma Calendar" in
+
a printed Roman wall calendar for 2006 and 2007.
+
  
*[MAGG] VTI ROGAS
+
UR: 32 ; ABS: 0 , ANT: 1 (QFM): the item has '''passed'''.
*[SAS] uti rogas.
+
I got two calendars myself. This is just great.
+
*[FAC] VTI ROGAS.
+
Wonderful calendar.
+
*[MAM] Uti Rogas.
+
*[MBA] Uti Rogas.
+
*[PC] Uti Rogas.
+
*[MCS] VTI ROGAS.
+
Congratulations for the calendar!
+
*[CCS] Uti Rogas.
+
*[ECF] Uti Rogas.
+
*[GEM] VTI ROGAS.
+
*[LECA] Vti Rogas
+
*[GFBM] Uti Rogas.
+
*[CFBQ] Uti Rogas.
+
The Calendar is beautiful, I bought one to myself and a couple
+
more to give away. This is a splendid initiative, well worth our
+
support!
+
*[QFM] VTI ROGAS. I hope this is a successful venture for Curius.
+
*[CFD] Uti Rogas
+
*[TGP] VTI ROGAS.
+
*[MIP] VTI ROGAS
+
*[DIPI] Uti Rogas.
+
*[TLF] UTI ROGAS
+
*[LMS] VTI•ROGAS.
+
In Hispania we made a Wall Calendar for 2758 A•V•C that was an
+
example for some students and scholars. This idea is quite good and
+
deserves to be backed from here.
+
*[MMA] Abstain.
+
For those who have a problem with this decision, it means to me
+
that I am unwilling to cast either a NO or YES vote to this measure.
+
My reasoning in this matter I should be glad to share with anyone
+
interested on a personal basis.
+
*[GMHF] Uti Rogas. Good initiative!
+
*[PMS] Uti Rogas.
+
*[AMA] VTI ROGAS
+
*[MOG] uti rogas. This is exactly the sort of initiative we should see more of.
+
*[TOPA] Uti rogas. Caius Curius Saturninus continually displays great initiative,
+
and I applaud him for it.
+
*[GPL] Uti Rogas.
+
*[GSA] Uti Rogas.
+
*[JSM] VTI ROGAS
+
*[LSA] Uti rogas
+
*[QSP] uti rogas.
+
A great idea and an educational tool that will provoke many
+
questions when displayed in a home or office.
+
*[ATMC] Uti Rogas. I would love to get a couple of these.
+
*[FVG] Uti Rogas.
+
  
Results of Item VI: Uti Rogas, 32 ; Antiquo, 0 ; Abstineo, 1.
 
The item passed.
 
  
 +
===Votes and opinions===
  
ITEM VII: Elysium Gathering (September 21, 2006 until September 24,
+
The following senators have issued the following commentaries:
200-6), an event in Ohio, shall be officially co-sponsored by Nova
+
*FAC: UR. If the sponsorship would require no money to NR, it's ok for me. On contrary a financial report is required.
Roma. Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, the event coordinator of Elysium
+
*MCS: UR, as I read that at this point no money is required from Nova Roma. I've nothing against allocating funds for real life events, I just ask that should money be required a detailed request is submitted to the Senate, like for the Conventus. My best wishes to our Consul for the organization of this event!
Gathering, shall be the contact person between the event and Nova
+
*CFBQ: Uti Rogas. Nova Roma should be more about RL events and this is a good step in the right direction! Well done Consul!
Roma.
+
*QFM: ANT. Sponsorship usually means money expended for advertising, and event insurance bought. Neither is accounted for in the budget I reviewed.
 +
*LMS: UR. I'm looking forward for the Hadrian Wall event of August, which should be also co-sponsored by NR.
 +
*GMHF: UR. I attended last years Elysium Gathering, which included a ritual to Pomona and a ritual to Minerva, and can say without reservations that this is an excellent event that NR should be proud to co-sponsor.
 +
*MOG: UR. This is a highly visible, real-world event.
 +
*QSP: UR. This is what I hope we are about in the near future!
 +
*ATMC: UR. I will give serious consideration to attending if a reasonable number of Nova Romans are going.
  
*[MAGG] VTI ROGAS
 
*[SAS] uti rogas.
 
*[FAC] VTI ROGAS.
 
If the sponsorship would require no money to NR, it's ok for me.
 
On contrary a financial report is required.
 
*[MAM] Uti Rogas.
 
*[MBA] Uti Rogas.
 
*[PC] Uti Rogas.
 
*[MCS] VTI ROGAS i vote Vti Rogas as I read that at this point no money is
 
required from Nova Roma. I've nothing against allocating funds for
 
real life events, I just ask that should money be required a detailed
 
request is submitted to the Senate, like for the Conventus. My best
 
wishes to our Consul for the organization of this event!
 
*[CCS] Uti Rogas.
 
*[ECF] Uti Rogas.
 
*[GEM] VTI ROGAS.
 
*[LECA] Vti Rogas
 
*[GFBM] Uti Rogas.
 
*[CFBQ] Uti Rogas. Nova Roma should be more about RL events and this is a good step
 
in the right direction! Well done Consul!
 
[QFM] ANTIQVO. Sponsorship usually means money expended for advertising, and
 
event insurance bought. Neither is accounted for in the budget I
 
reviewed.
 
*[CFD] Uti Rogas
 
*[TGP] VTI ROGAS
 
*[MIP] VTI ROGAS
 
*[DIPI] Uti Rogas.
 
*[TLF] UTI ROGAS
 
*[LMS] VTI•ROGAS. I'm looking forward for the Hadrian Wall event of August, which
 
should be also co-sponsored by NR.
 
*[MMA] YES.
 
*[GMHF] Uti Rogas.
 
I attended last years Elysium Gathering, which included a ritual
 
to Pomona and a ritual to Minerva, and can say without reservations
 
that this is an excellent event that NR should be proud to co-
 
sponsor.
 
*[PMS] Uti Rogas.
 
*[AMA] VTI ROGAS
 
*[MOG] uti rogas. This is a highly visible, real-world event.
 
*[TOPA] Uti rogas.
 
*[GPL] Uti Rogas.
 
*[GSA] Uti Rogas.
 
*[JSM] VTI ROGAS
 
*[LSA] Uti rogas
 
*[QSP] uti rogas. This is what I hope we are about in the near future!
 
*[ATMC] Uti Rogas. I will give serious consideration to attending if a reasonable
 
number of Nova Romans are going.
 
*[FVG] Uti Rogas.
 
  
Results of Item VII: Uti Rogas, 32 ; Antiquo, 1 ; Abstineo, 0.
 
The item passed.
 
  
 +
'''Marcus Arminius Maior'''
 +
<br>Tribunus Plebis
  
Salvete
 
Marcus Arminius Maior
 
Tribunus Plebis
 
  
</div>
 
  
 
[[Category:MMDCCLIX]]
 
[[Category:MMDCCLIX]]

Revision as of 13:53, 16 January 2010

Tribunus Plebis Marcus Arminius Maior Quiritibus SPD


Senate Voting Results, published on a.d. XVI Kal. Martias MMDCCLIX A.U.C., or 14 February 2006 AD.

In 13th of February, the latest session of the Senate of Nova Roma was declared closed by the Consul Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, in which 33 of the 38 senatores voted, fulfilling the quorum needed for the session.

The voting consisted in seven items, two of them, of numbers IV and V, being constitutional amendments, already voted and approved by the Comitia Centuriata. Such constitutional amendments needed to have two thirds of the votes of all the Senate, that is, at least 26 votes, so the amendments can change our Constitution.

Here are the list of the 33 voting Senators, alphabetically listed by nomen:

  • [MAGG] Marcus Antonius Gryllus Graecus
  • [SAS] Sextus Apollonius Scipio
  • [FAC] Franciscus Apulus Caesar
  • [MAM] Marcus Arminius Maior
  • [MBA] Marcus Bianchius Antonius
  • [PC] Patricia Cassia
  • [MCS] Manius Constantinus Serapio
  • [CCS] Caius Curius Saturninus
  • [ECF] Emilia Curia Finnica
  • [GEM] Gnaeus Equitius Marinus
  • [LECA] Lucius Equitius Cincinnatus Augur
  • [GFBM] Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus
  • [CFBQ] Caeso Fabius Buteo Quintilianus
  • [QFM] Quintus Fabius Maximus
  • [CFD] Caius Flavius Diocletianus
  • [TGP] Tiberius Galerius Paulinus
  • [MIP] Marcus Iulius Perusianus
  • [DIPI] Decius Iunius Palladius Invictus
  • [TLF] Titus Labienus Fortunatus
  • [LMS] Lucius Minicius Sceptius
  • [MMA] Marcus Minucius Audens
  • [GMHF] Gaius Minucius Hadrianus Felix
  • [PMS] Pompeia Minucia Strabo
  • [AMA] Arnamentia Moravia Aurelia
  • [MOG] Marcus Octavius Germanicus
  • [TOPA] Titus Octavius Pius Ahenobarbus
  • [GPL] Gaius Popillius Laenas
  • [GSA] Gnaeus Salvius Astur
  • [JSM] Julilla Sempronia Magna
  • [LSA] Lucius Sergius Australicus
  • [QSP] Quintus Suetonius Paulinus
  • [ATMC] Appius Tullius Marcellus Cato
  • [FVG] Flavius Vedius Germanicus

The following 5 senatores failed to vote in this session:

  • [LAF] Lucius Arminius Faustus
  • [MCJ] Marcus Cassius Julianus
  • [LCSF] Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
  • [GL] Gaia Livia
  • [GMM] Gaius Marius Merullus


The items for consideration were as follows:


Contents

ITEM I: Approval of Marcus Iulius Severus as an Interpreter of Spanish and French


Results

UR: 33 ; ABS: 0, ANT: 0: the item has passed.


Votes and opinions

All UR.


ITEM II: Approval of Publius Constantinus Placidus as an Interpreter of Italian


Results

UR: 33 ; ABS: 0, ANT: 0: the item has passed.


Votes and opinions

The following senators have issued the following commentaries: Senator FAC has declared about Placidus: "I know him directly, a very skilled citizen".


ITEM III: Approval of Aulus Horatius Severus as Interpreter of Portuguese


Results

UR: 33 ; ABS: 0, ANT: 0: the item has passed.


Votes and opinions

The following senators have issued the following commentaries:

  • [CFBQ] Uti Rogas. I am very grateful that these three gentlemen are prepared to give their time to the Res Publica!
  • [GMHF] Uti Rogas. I'd like to offer my thanks to these three individuals for offering their services to NR as Interpreters. It is a difficult, and I suspect sometimes thankless task that is vital for the functioning of our


ITEM IV: Approval of the constitutional amendment #1 from December 2005 Comitia centuriata


Results

UR: 13 ; ABS: 9 (MAGG, MBA, GEM, MIP, LMS, AMA, GPL, GSA, JSM), ANT (LECA, QFM, CFD, TGP, DIPI, TLF, GMHF, MMA, MOG, LSA, QSP) : 11: the item has failed: a constitutional amendment needed 2/3 of the whole Curia's votes, so 26 votes to be approved, and received only 14.


Votes and opinions

The following senators have issued the following commentaries:

  • [FAC]: UR: The amendment gives us more possibilities to change the law.
  • [GEM]: ABS. This amendment was put forth as part of an attempt to rectify the problem we had with a tribunician resignation last year. However, its original sponsors have not promoted it during this session of the Senate, and I'm left wondering if they still support it.
  • [LECA] ANT. This amendment would accomplish nothing.
  • [CFBQ] UR: Now the only thing we need to do is to change the law.
  • [QFM] ANT. Gentlemen, as written, this implies that we can change the law about a legally valid resignation. Since this allows the rewriting the law & reasons every time we have a new consul, this accomplishes nothing.
  • [TGP] ANT. The current standard is higher and should remain in place.
  • [GMHF] ANT. The change strikes me as unnecessary.
  • [MOG] ANTIQUO. The amendment accomplishes nothing; it complicates the text needlessly. You could similarly add "legally valid" before almost every noun in the Constitution - what's the point? If a registration isn't "legally valid", then it isn't a resignation, so that part of the Constitution would not apply. There is no need to restate the obvious. Furthermore, having "legally valid" and "as defined by pursuant law" is redundant - what else would "legally valid" be defined by?
  • [QSP] ANTIQUO. I agree that the text is better and less complicated as it stands now.


ITEM V: Approval of the constitutional amendment #2 from December 2005 Comitia centuriata


Results

UR: 12 ; ABS: 16 (MBA, PC, CCS, ECF, LECA, CFBQ, MIP, DIPI, TLF, LMS, PMS, AMA, TOPA, GPL, GSA, JSM), ANT (LSA, QFM, CFD, TGP, FVG) : 5: the item has failed: a constitutional amendment needed 2/3 of the whole Curia's votes, so 26 votes to be approved, and received only 12.


Votes and opinions

The following senators have issued the following commentaries:

  • FAC: UR. I think it would quite uncomfortable to by-pass what the Comitia approved in the last December and I don't see any problem with thisproposal.
  • GEM: UR. This amendment will significantly ease the duties of the webmaster, moving us away from a past policy and supporting our established policy of basing assignment in the rural tribes on assidui status.
  • CFBQ: ABS. The reason we make this change is that some of us want to prepare a Constitutional change that I am not sure I agree with. Let us do it the right way instead, let us discuss the Constitutional change first.
  • QFM: ANT. Call me conservative. But every time we change something more problems appear.
  • PMS: ABS. After some thought, and entertaining the wisdom of those of this august body who offered their views, I too, would like to take a more comprehensive look at the full ramifications of this.
  • MOG: UR. A sensible change, and one that eliminates some 'paperwork'.
  • TOPA: ABS. The amendment implicates some further changes I am unwilling to support. I believe Nova Roma needs full-time Censors and our current system with overlapping two-year terms doesn't need fixing.
  • QSP: UR. A good change and it looks easier to manage on the paper work end.


ITEM VI: Grant of permission to citizen Caius Curius Saturninus to use the Nova Roma logo, and text of "The Official Nova Roma Calendar" in a printed Roman wall calendar for 2006 and 2007


Results

UR: 32 ; ABS: 1 (MMA), ANT: 0: the item has passed.


Votes and opinions

The following senators have issued the following commentaries:

  • SAS: UR. I got two calendars myself. This is just great.
  • FAC: UR. Wonderful calendar.
  • MCS: UR. Congratulations for the calendar! The Calendar is beautiful, I bought one to myself and a couple

more to give away. This is a splendid initiative, well worth our support!

  • QFM: UR. I hope this is a successful venture for Curius.
  • LMS: UR. In Hispania we made a Wall Calendar for 2758 A•V•C that was an example for some students and scholars. This idea is quite good and deserves to be backed from here.
  • MMA: Abstain. For those who have a problem with this decision, it means to me that I am unwilling to cast either a NO or YES vote to this measure. My reasoning in this matter I should be glad to share with anyone interested on a personal basis.
  • GMHF: UR. Good initiative!
  • MOG: UR. This is exactly the sort of initiative we should see more of.
  • TOPA: UR. Caius Curius Saturninus continually displays great initiative, and I applaud him for it.
  • QSP: UR. A great idea and an educational tool that will provoke many questions when displayed in a home or office.
  • ATMC: UR. I would love to get a couple of these.


ITEM VII: Elysium gathering shall be officially co-sponsored by Nova Roma


Proposal

Elysium gathering (September 21, 2006 until September 24, 200-6), an event in Ohio, shall be officially co-sponsored by Nova Roma. Gaius Fabius Buteo Modianus, the event coordinator of Elysium Gathering, shall be the contact person between the event and Nova Roma.

Results

UR: 32 ; ABS: 0 , ANT: 1 (QFM): the item has passed.


Votes and opinions

The following senators have issued the following commentaries:

  • FAC: UR. If the sponsorship would require no money to NR, it's ok for me. On contrary a financial report is required.
  • MCS: UR, as I read that at this point no money is required from Nova Roma. I've nothing against allocating funds for real life events, I just ask that should money be required a detailed request is submitted to the Senate, like for the Conventus. My best wishes to our Consul for the organization of this event!
  • CFBQ: Uti Rogas. Nova Roma should be more about RL events and this is a good step in the right direction! Well done Consul!
  • QFM: ANT. Sponsorship usually means money expended for advertising, and event insurance bought. Neither is accounted for in the budget I reviewed.
  • LMS: UR. I'm looking forward for the Hadrian Wall event of August, which should be also co-sponsored by NR.
  • GMHF: UR. I attended last years Elysium Gathering, which included a ritual to Pomona and a ritual to Minerva, and can say without reservations that this is an excellent event that NR should be proud to co-sponsor.
  • MOG: UR. This is a highly visible, real-world event.
  • QSP: UR. This is what I hope we are about in the near future!
  • ATMC: UR. I will give serious consideration to attending if a reasonable number of Nova Romans are going.


Marcus Arminius Maior
Tribunus Plebis

Personal tools