User talk:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus

From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Style Guide)
m (cleaning time)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Cultus Task Force|Member}}
 
{{Cultus Task Force|Member}}
 
== Calendar articles ==
 
 
Salve, Q. Metelle! I think we should have to make some order between the many general articles on calendar. It's quite a mess. We have now:
 
 
*[[Calendar]]
 
*[[Calendar (Nova Roma)]]
 
*[[Roman calendar]]
 
*[[Fasti]]
 
 
Instead of 4 we should have 2, one for ancient Rome, one for Nova Roma. What do you think?
 
--[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 12:15, 5 January 2009 (CET)
 
 
:Adsentior, Cn. Lentule!  Apud [[Fasti_MMDCCLXII|Fastos]] me uti pagina [[Roman calendar|de calendario Romano]] ad dies Atros nundinasque definiendos.  Fortasse paginae de calendario Romano et [[Fasti|de fastis]] ad paginam de calendario moueatur, ut solum paginae de calendario et [[Calendar (Nova Roma)|de calendario nouo]] remaneant?  Quo modo paginae duae nobis habentur, una de calendario antiquo, una de nouo. -- [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 20:26, 5 January 2009 (CET)
 
 
::Tibi Anglice respondeo, Metelle Pie, ut omnes qui hoc colloquium sequuntur nos intellegant, nam perpauci sunt editores hujus aranei Latine loquentes vel scribentes. I thought a lot on these articles and I think that all of them is necessary in one or another way. [[Calendar]] is just a page that shows the calendar. It should be pointing to our current calendar. [[Calendar (Nova Roma)]] should describe how the Nova Roman calendar is composed, how we reconstruct it, what the authorities are on calendar issues etc. [[Roman calendar]] describes the ancient roman calendar. [[Fasti]] perhaps could be merged in [[Calendar]], or redirected, but it is good if it remains a disambiguation page. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:02, 12 January 2009 (CET)
 
 
== Your candidacy ==
 
 
Mi Metelle, I am not authorized to let your candidacy on the page since you were not accepted by the Tribunes because of the age requirement. Sorry for that! Vale! --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 02:15, 25 October 2009 (CET)
 
 
== Cato's candidacy ==
 
 
This has come to my mind after my previous comment: was ever Cato's candidacy officially announced and declared, then accepted by the consuls? If not, we can't put it on the page, until he declares his candidacy officially. Vale iterum. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 02:23, 25 October 2009 (CET)
 
 
== Style Guide ==
 
 
I have read your message, amice, and I'll comment your suggestions in the NRWiki mailing list!
 
 
Vale! --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 23:17, 4 November 2009 (CET)
 

Revision as of 03:47, 14 March 2010

Platner-temple-line-trans-50.gif

Cultus Task Force
Member

A multilingual project to improve the Cultus Deorum documents on this site.
Personal tools