User talk:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus
From NovaRoma
Revision as of 16:04, 12 January 2009 by Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus (Talk | contribs)
Cultus Task Force
Member
Calendar articles
Salve, Q. Metelle! I think we should have to make some order between the many general articles on calendar. It's quite a mess. We have now:
Instead of 4 we should have 2, one for ancient Rome, one for Nova Roma. What do you think? --Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus 12:15, 5 January 2009 (CET)
- Adsentior, Cn. Lentule! Apud Fastos me uti pagina de calendario Romano ad dies Atros nundinasque definiendos. Fortasse paginae de calendario Romano et de fastis ad paginam de calendario moueatur, ut solum paginae de calendario et de calendario nouo remaneant? Quo modo paginae duae nobis habentur, una de calendario antiquo, una de nouo. -- Q·CAEC·MET·POST 20:26, 5 January 2009 (CET)
- Tibi Anglice respondeo, Metelle Pie, ut omnes qui hoc colloquium sequuntur nos intellegant, nam perpauci sunt editores hujus aranei Latine loquentes vel scribentes. I thought a lot on these articles and I think that all of them is necessary in one or another way. Calendar is just a page that shows the calendar. It should be pointing to our current calendar. Calendar (Nova Roma) should describe how the Nova Roman calendar is composed, how we reconstruct it, what the authorities are on calendar issues etc. Roman calendar describes the ancient roman calendar. Fasti perhaps could be merged in Calendar, or redirected, but it is good if it remains a disambiguation page. --Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus 17:02, 12 January 2009 (CET)
