|
Prof Heidi Amelia-Anne Weber
Augustus
(3)
Why didn't he resign after having healed the illness of the State,
like Sulla did? Why did he choose a successor, definitely killing
the Republic?
G With the passing of Augustus in 14 AD, few remained who had lived
in the Roman world of the old Republic. The Republic had been created
at a time when it was needed for it grew out of the need for stability
in a age of tumultuous conflict and insecurity. However, its demise
resulted from power being concentrated into the hands of a single
individual, which went against its very nature. Also, there was
an inability of the system to function effectively. At various points,
the Roman state began to crumble and needed to be healed. The solutions
frequently proved to be temporary and not always binding.
When Sulla brought his army into Rome, he met with minimal favor.
However when his actions turned violent and he began a mass campaign
of burning homes, the public tepidly accepted him. His struggle
to attain power was a bitter one, but he became dictator with the
passage of the lex Valeria. Sulla then proceeded to create his type
of government wherein his power was to end only with his death or
resignation. He modified the courts, the laws and the Senate to
help foster the grand changes he hoped to instill. One of the major
aspirations in his reforms was a means to minimize the ability of
the "wrong" people to move into office.
Sulla believed he had created the ideal government for the burgeoning
Rome. Attaining satisfaction with the system, he felt
his work done and retired from office to live his few remaining
days at peace. The government that had been established was based
on Senatorial supremacy, members whom he had personally selected.
Having abandoned popular assemblies, the lack of representation
of their interests left a large void in the state, one that would
backfire. Great animosities toward the government that had been
generated promptly emerged within a relatively brief time after
Sulla's resignation. Overall, Sulla's allegiances had lain with
himself and no other, which did not create a stable government.
Almost instantly, the government began to crumble and with his demise,
it rapidly buckled. His mending of the wounds of the state technically
had only received temporary bandages. Those who came after Sulla
in leadership positions were faced with the problems associated
with these failures and had great difficulty in trying to repair
Rome.
Augustus was aware of the inadequacies of the government instituted
by Sulla. He also recognized that that government functioned under
Sulla's authority and none other. The emperor knew he needed to
see his changes and institutions followed through as long as he
was able. Augustus did not want to abandon the state that he had
created, for he felt in the times in which they lived, his guidance
was necessary for its success. Though he was well aware he would
not live forever, he would see to it that his ideals and beliefs
were followed cautiously.
Though in a measure to ease the ill fears of the people, Augustus
vowed to restore the Republic and then step down. The res
republica was loosely defined and he was aware that he could mold
it to conform to the government he had established. Augustus had
no intention of removing himself from office yet sought the Senate's
reaffirmation of his leadership when he proclaimed both the rebirth
of the Republic as well as his resignation. Since he chose not to
step down after the Senate conferred numerous honors and powers
upon him, he in turn created an oligarchy. The res republica would
truly not be reinstated in fact. In actuality, it existed really
only in the minds of the people. The Roman Republic ceased to exist
with the conference of the title Augustus to Octavian.
Augustus had created an imperial monarchy or at least set the basis
for its existence in Rome. The Republic's death knell had
been a long process and not one individual is completely responsible
for its demise. Augustus' maintenance of power did not abolish the
Republic, but it did take the government further away from those
institutions embodied in its very existence. What Augustus brought
to Rome was peace, something that had been missing in the lives
of the citizens. Under the mask of being the Republic, his option
to remain in power was one that helped sustain the empire, which
was still recovering from the decades of chaos that had proceeded.
|