|  | Prof Heidi Amelia-Anne WeberAugustus
(3)Why didn't he resign after having healed the illness of the State, 
              like Sulla did? Why did he choose a successor, definitely killing 
              the Republic?
 
 
 G With the passing of Augustus in 14 AD, few remained who had lived 
              in the Roman world of the old Republic. The Republic had been created 
              at a time when it was needed for it grew out of the need for stability 
              in a age of tumultuous conflict and insecurity. However, its demise 
              resulted from power being concentrated into the hands of a single 
              individual, which went against its very nature. Also, there was 
              an inability of the system to function effectively. At various points, 
              the Roman state began to crumble and needed to be healed. The solutions 
              frequently proved to be temporary and not always binding.When Sulla brought his army into Rome, he met with minimal favor. 
              However when his actions turned violent and he began a mass campaign 
              of burning homes, the public tepidly accepted him. His struggle 
              to attain power was a bitter one, but he became dictator with the 
              passage of the lex Valeria. Sulla then proceeded to create his type 
              of government wherein his power was to end only with his death or 
              resignation. He modified the courts, the laws and the Senate to 
              help foster the grand changes he hoped to instill. One of the major 
              aspirations in his reforms was a means to minimize the ability of 
              the "wrong" people to move into office.
 Sulla believed he had created the ideal government for the burgeoning 
              Rome. Attaining satisfaction with the system, he felt
 his work done and retired from office to live his few remaining 
              days at peace. The government that had been established was based 
              on Senatorial supremacy, members whom he had personally selected. 
              Having abandoned popular assemblies, the lack of representation 
              of their interests left a large void in the state, one that would 
              backfire. Great animosities toward the government that had been 
              generated promptly emerged within a relatively brief time after 
              Sulla's resignation. Overall, Sulla's allegiances had lain with 
              himself and no other, which did not create a stable government. 
              Almost instantly, the government began to crumble and with his demise, 
              it rapidly buckled. His mending of the wounds of the state technically 
              had only received temporary bandages. Those who came after Sulla 
              in leadership positions were faced with the problems associated 
              with these failures and had great difficulty in trying to repair 
              Rome.
 Augustus was aware of the inadequacies of the government instituted 
              by Sulla. He also recognized that that government functioned under 
              Sulla's authority and none other. The emperor knew he needed to 
              see his changes and institutions followed through as long as he 
              was able. Augustus did not want to abandon the state that he had 
              created, for he felt in the times in which they lived, his guidance 
              was necessary for its success. Though he was well aware he would 
              not live forever, he would see to it that his ideals and beliefs 
              were followed cautiously.
 Though in a measure to ease the ill fears of the people, Augustus 
              vowed to restore the Republic and then step down. The res
 republica was loosely defined and he was aware that he could mold 
              it to conform to the government he had established. Augustus had 
              no intention of removing himself from office yet sought the Senate's 
              reaffirmation of his leadership when he proclaimed both the rebirth 
              of the Republic as well as his resignation. Since he chose not to 
              step down after the Senate conferred numerous honors and powers 
              upon him, he in turn created an oligarchy. The res republica would 
              truly not be reinstated in fact. In actuality, it existed really 
              only in the minds of the people. The Roman Republic ceased to exist 
              with the conference of the title Augustus to Octavian.
 Augustus had created an imperial monarchy or at least set the basis 
              for its existence in Rome. The Republic's death knell had
 been a long process and not one individual is completely responsible 
              for its demise. Augustus' maintenance of power did not abolish the 
              Republic, but it did take the government further away from those 
              institutions embodied in its very existence. What Augustus brought 
              to Rome was peace, something that had been missing in the lives 
              of the citizens. Under the mask of being the Republic, his option 
              to remain in power was one that helped sustain the empire, which 
              was still recovering from the decades of chaos that had proceeded.
 |