Election MMDCCLXI (Nova Roma)/Aula Tullia Scholastica
(ATS statement) |
m (Added hd tag) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{HistoricalDocument}} | ||
{{CandidateStatementPage|office=rogator}}[[Category:MMDCCLXI]] | {{CandidateStatementPage|office=rogator}}[[Category:MMDCCLXI]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:16, 9 July 2024
THIS IS AN ARCHIVED PAGE DOCUMENTING THE INTERNAL HISTORY OF NOVA ROMA: LEARN MORE ABOUT ARCHIVED PAGES
IN·MEMORIAM·A·TVLLIAE·SCHOLASTICAE·AVGVSTAE·PRINCIPIS·SENATVS·CENSORIS·IIII·CONSVLIS·II·PRAETRICIS
Home| Latíné | Deutsch | Español | Français | Italiano | Magyar | Português | Română | Русский | English
|
Aula Tullia Scholastica
Candidate for rogator. |
A. Tullia Scholastica quiritibus S.P.D.
As some of you may have seen on the candidates’ page, I am again seeking the office of rogatrix because neither the soon-to-be senior censor nor at least one of the candidates seeking the censorship is skilled in Latin and they will need the help of Latinists. At least some magistrate in the censors’ office ought to be skilled in Latin, and I am pleased that another Latinist is also running for this post. I held the office of rogatrix three years ago, and have been a censorial scriba for three or four years, and remain one. What happens in the censors’ office is quite well known and familiar to me. The other candidate seeking the office of rogator, although an excellent and highly skilled Latinist, is not familiar with the manifold duties of the censors’ office. I can easily guide and help him; I think we will be excellent colleagues.
Valete.
