Talk:Lacus Curtius
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: I dumped this in here, but I have a reservation about possible copyvio. Could someone look into this? ~~~~) |
m (agree) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I dumped this in here, but I have a reservation about possible copyvio. Could someone look into this? [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 04:23, 14 August 2007 (CEST) | I dumped this in here, but I have a reservation about possible copyvio. Could someone look into this? [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 04:23, 14 August 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :The text seems to be taken from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtius_(gens) an article on wikipedia]. As far as I can gather from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verbatim_copying this page] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights#Reusers.27_rights_and_obligations this page] articles from wikipedia must be reproduced either ''in toto'' without additions or omissions or else in accordance with various conditions such as giving credit to wikipedia. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Seems to me that it would, in general, be safer to have a policy of '''no copying from wikipedia please'''. Not only does it pose potential legal problems (though in reality these are rather unlikely to come to anything), but it also makes us look lazy and derivative. If one is going to plagiarize anything at all, why plagiarize a non-specialist source of low acadmic standing? | ||
| + | |||
| + | :- [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 14:33, 14 August 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Indeed. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 18:02, 14 August 2007 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:03, 14 August 2007
I dumped this in here, but I have a reservation about possible copyvio. Could someone look into this? Agricola 04:23, 14 August 2007 (CEST)
- The text seems to be taken from an article on wikipedia. As far as I can gather from this page and this page articles from wikipedia must be reproduced either in toto without additions or omissions or else in accordance with various conditions such as giving credit to wikipedia.
- Seems to me that it would, in general, be safer to have a policy of no copying from wikipedia please. Not only does it pose potential legal problems (though in reality these are rather unlikely to come to anything), but it also makes us look lazy and derivative. If one is going to plagiarize anything at all, why plagiarize a non-specialist source of low acadmic standing?
- - Cordus 14:33, 14 August 2007 (CEST)
- Indeed. Agricola 18:02, 14 August 2007 (CEST)
