Talk:Ludi Apollinares 2761 AUC (Nova Roma)
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(correct Latin name is Apollinares) |
m (Talk:Ludi Apollinari 2761 AUC (Nova Roma) moved to Talk:Ludi Apollinares 2761 AUC (Nova Roma): correction of the title) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Salve! | Salve! | ||
− | The correct Latin name of this is "Ludi Apollinares". " | + | The correct Latin name of this is ''"Ludi Apollinares"''. "''Apollinaris, -e''" is a third declension adjective, so its '''plural nominative''' is "'''-es'''", just like ''equites'', ''consules'', ''Megalenses'' etc... |
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Vale! | Vale! | ||
− | --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 09: | + | --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 09:01, 13 July 2008 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 14:58, 28 July 2008
Salve!
The correct Latin name of this is "Ludi Apollinares". "Apollinaris, -e" is a third declension adjective, so its plural nominative is "-es", just like equites, consules, Megalenses etc...
Thank you for the attention!
Vale!
--Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus 09:01, 13 July 2008 (CEST)