Talk:Cerialia
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
m (→Move/merge) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I'd like to know the opinions of others before I move the content. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Q Caecilius Metellus Postumianus]] 04:32, 5 February 2013 (CET) | I'd like to know the opinions of others before I move the content. [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Q Caecilius Metellus Postumianus]] 04:32, 5 February 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I agree. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 11:33, 5 February 2013 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:34, 5 February 2013
Move/merge
The paragraph beginning "Ceres was the daughter of ..." to "...adoption of the Greek goddess and her daughter Kore." seems more fitting as part of an article on Ceres; it does not contribute to explaining the Cerealia, only the goddess and her cult.
Similarly, parts of the last paragraph are questionable, but above all, the final sentences, explaining the temple and flamen of Ceres, and the use of the former as a depository, certainly contribute nothing to this page, though would be appropriate for a page on Ceres herself.
I'd like to know the opinions of others before I move the content. Q Caecilius Metellus Postumianus 04:32, 5 February 2013 (CET)
- I agree. --Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus 11:33, 5 February 2013 (CET)
