Talk:Codex Iuris Novae Romae

From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (request a change)
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Presentation of information: Format==
 +
 +
We now have:
 +
----
 +
'''Cives'''
 +
 +
Lex Cornelia de Privatis Rebus
 +
:About the definition and use of confidential, private, sensitive and personal informations of the cives by the magistrates of Nova Roma.
 +
 +
Lex Vedia de Civitatis Petitionibus Inter Suffragia
 +
:About the requests of citizenship coming during a comitial proceeding.
 +
----
 +
 +
I think that this would be more useful:
 +
----
 +
'''Cives'''
 +
 +
'''Use of personal information of the cives by the magistrates of Nova Roma. '''
 +
:Lex Cornelia de Privatis Rebus
 +
 +
'''Requests for citizenship during a comitial proceeding.'''
 +
:Lex Vedia de Civitatis Petitionibus Inter Suffragia
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
This makes it easier to deal with ammendments and suchlike. Thoughts?
 +
 +
[[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 10:27, 27 August 2007 (CEST)
 +
 
With this one I must voice a protest (perhaps not a fully blown protest).  Might I suggest amending ''Collegium Pontificum and other Religious bodies'' to something that doesn't highlight the rather modern concept of the seperation of religion and the State, like, for example, ''the Sacred Colleges''? [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Q. Caecilius Metellus]], [[Pontifex (Nova Roma)|Pontifex]]
 
With this one I must voice a protest (perhaps not a fully blown protest).  Might I suggest amending ''Collegium Pontificum and other Religious bodies'' to something that doesn't highlight the rather modern concept of the seperation of religion and the State, like, for example, ''the Sacred Colleges''? [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Q. Caecilius Metellus]], [[Pontifex (Nova Roma)|Pontifex]]
 +
:''Sacred Colleges'' sounds good to me. What we have now is too long. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 05:51, 25 June 2006 (CDT)
 +
 +
Hey I can read the page CJNR; it is clear & lucid!!
 +
Marca Hortensia Maior (sorry I didn't know, so I signed a day later aug. 26,2007)
 +
:Yeah, Fuscus made a good start. Don't forget to sign your comments. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 04:25, 26 August 2007 (CEST)
 +
 +
 +
==Links to the old pages==
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
 +
*[[CJNR_de_civibus]]
 +
*[[CJNR de gentibus et familiis]]
 +
*[[CJNR de tribibus et centuriis]]
 +
*[[CJNR de comitiis]]
 +
*[[CJNR de magistratibus]]
 +
*[[CJNR de senatu]]
 +
*[[CJNR de collegiis sacris]] 
 +
*[[Laws and Decrees of Judicial Nature]]
 +
*[[CJNR de sodalitatibus]]
 +
*[[CJNR de foro]] 
 +
*[[CJNR de legibus decretisque variis]]
 +
<div class="scriptum">[[CJNR_CIPI]] is a large page that was not properly integrated here. It duplicates some of this page and incorporates legal texts. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 07:46, 25 August 2007 (CEST)</div>

Latest revision as of 07:22, 12 November 2022

Presentation of information: Format

We now have:

Cives

Lex Cornelia de Privatis Rebus

About the definition and use of confidential, private, sensitive and personal informations of the cives by the magistrates of Nova Roma.

Lex Vedia de Civitatis Petitionibus Inter Suffragia

About the requests of citizenship coming during a comitial proceeding.

I think that this would be more useful:

Cives

Use of personal information of the cives by the magistrates of Nova Roma.

Lex Cornelia de Privatis Rebus

Requests for citizenship during a comitial proceeding.

Lex Vedia de Civitatis Petitionibus Inter Suffragia

This makes it easier to deal with ammendments and suchlike. Thoughts?

Agricola 10:27, 27 August 2007 (CEST)

With this one I must voice a protest (perhaps not a fully blown protest). Might I suggest amending Collegium Pontificum and other Religious bodies to something that doesn't highlight the rather modern concept of the seperation of religion and the State, like, for example, the Sacred Colleges? Q. Caecilius Metellus, Pontifex

Sacred Colleges sounds good to me. What we have now is too long. M. Lucretius Agricola 05:51, 25 June 2006 (CDT)

Hey I can read the page CJNR; it is clear & lucid!! Marca Hortensia Maior (sorry I didn't know, so I signed a day later aug. 26,2007)

Yeah, Fuscus made a good start. Don't forget to sign your comments. Agricola 04:25, 26 August 2007 (CEST)


Links to the old pages


CJNR_CIPI is a large page that was not properly integrated here. It duplicates some of this page and incorporates legal texts. Agricola 07:46, 25 August 2007 (CEST)
Retrieved from "http://novaroma.org/nr/Talk:Codex_Iuris_Novae_Romae"
Personal tools