|
|
| (9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | + | {{HistoricalDocument}} |
| | {{Cultus Task Force|Member}} | | {{Cultus Task Force|Member}} |
| | | | |
| − | == Calendar articles ==
| |
| | | | |
| − | Salve, Q. Metelle! I think we should have to make some order between the many general articles on calendar. It's quite a mess. We have now:
| |
| | | | |
| − | *[[Calendar]]
| |
| − | *[[Calendar (Nova Roma)]]
| |
| − | *[[Roman calendar]]
| |
| − | *[[Fasti]]
| |
| | | | |
| − | Instead of 4 we should have 2, one for ancient Rome, one for Nova Roma. What do you think?
| |
| − | --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 12:15, 5 January 2009 (CET)
| |
| | | | |
| − | :Adsentior, Cn. Lentule! Apud [[Fasti_MMDCCLXII|Fastos]] me uti pagina [[Roman calendar|de calendario Romano]] ad dies Atros nundinasque definiendos. Fortasse paginae de calendario Romano et [[Fasti|de fastis]] ad paginam de calendario moueatur, ut solum paginae de calendario et [[Calendar (Nova Roma)|de calendario nouo]] remaneant? Quo modo paginae duae nobis habentur, una de calendario antiquo, una de nouo. -- [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Q·CAEC·MET·POST]] 20:26, 5 January 2009 (CET)
| |
| | | | |
| − | ::Tibi Anglice respondeo, Metelle Pie, ut omnes qui hoc colloquium sequuntur nos intellegant, nam perpauci sunt editores hujus aranei Latine loquentes vel scribentes. I thought a lot on these articles and I think that all of them is necessary in one or another way. [[Calendar]] is just a page that shows the calendar. It should be pointing to our current calendar. [[Calendar (Nova Roma)]] should describe how the Nova Roman calendar is composed, how we reconstruct it, what the authorities are on calendar issues etc. [[Roman calendar]] describes the ancient roman calendar. [[Fasti]] perhaps could be merged in [[Calendar]], or redirected, but it is good if it remains a disambiguation page. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 17:02, 12 January 2009 (CET)
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Your candidacy ==
| |
| | | | |
| − | Mi Metelle, I am not authorized to let your candidacy on the page since you were not accepted by the Tribunes because of the age requirement. Sorry for that! Vale! --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 02:15, 25 October 2009 (CET)
| + | ==Wiki Editor Toolbar== |
| | | | |
| − | == Cato's candidacy ==
| + | Optime mi Q. Metelle, why did you have to remove the newly added editorial toolbar? It seemed to me a fine addition, useful for making edits easier. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 11:36, 5 February 2013 (CET) |
| − | | + | |
| − | This has come to my mind after my previous comment: was ever Cato's candidacy officially announced and declared, then accepted by the consuls? If not, we can't put it on the page, until he declares his candidacy officially. Vale iterum. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 02:23, 25 October 2009 (CET)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Style Guide ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I have read your message, amice, and I'll comment your suggestions in the NRWiki mailing list!
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Vale! --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 23:17, 4 November 2009 (CET)
| + | |
Optime mi Q. Metelle, why did you have to remove the newly added editorial toolbar? It seemed to me a fine addition, useful for making edits easier. --Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus 11:36, 5 February 2013 (CET)
