Talk:List of leges (Nova Roma)

From NovaRoma

(Difference between revisions)

Latest revision as of 04:55, 2 March 2009

I suggest that this be integrated with the CJNR. Agricola 23:56, 15 February 2007 (CET)

I agree with Agricola. Is anything preventing us from doing this? Marinus 23:52, 1 March 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 13:20, 16 February 2007 (view source) Marcus Octavius Gracchus (Talk \| contribs) m (Talk:List of leges moved to Talk:List of leges (Nova Roma): NR suffix required for all NR stuff) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 04:55, 2 March 2009 (view source) Gnaeus Equitius Marinus (Talk \| contribs)
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I suggest that this be integrated with the CJNR. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 23:56, 15 February 2007 (CET)		I suggest that this be integrated with the CJNR. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola\|Agricola]] 23:56, 15 February 2007 (CET)
		+
		+	I agree with Agricola. Is anything preventing us from doing this? [[User:Gnaeus Equitius Marinus\|Marinus]] 23:52, 1 March 2009 (EST)