Talk:Publicity material
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(Suggestion) |
m (repoint lmk) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | It looks from the context of the link from [[:Category: | + | It looks from the context of the link from [[:Category:Reenactments]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT) |
:Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date. | :Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date. | ||
::How about '''Publicity Material (Nova Roma)'''? [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 09:30, 16 July 2006 (CDT) | ::How about '''Publicity Material (Nova Roma)'''? [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 09:30, 16 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::Let's lower-case the "M": "Publicity material (Nova Roma)". This will let us blend the link easily into text. Remember, we can make the first letter in a link lower case and the wiki will automatically link to the upper-case version, but that trick works '''only''' for the first letter. Also, in this case I am of the opinion that the (Nova Roma) tag is not needed, as there is no ambiguity, but the policy seems to dictate we use it. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 15:26, 16 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:56, 11 August 2008
It looks from the context of the link from Category:Reenactments as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. Cordus 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
- Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date.
- How about Publicity Material (Nova Roma)? Cordus 09:30, 16 July 2006 (CDT)
- Let's lower-case the "M": "Publicity material (Nova Roma)". This will let us blend the link easily into text. Remember, we can make the first letter in a link lower case and the wiki will automatically link to the upper-case version, but that trick works only for the first letter. Also, in this case I am of the opinion that the (Nova Roma) tag is not needed, as there is no ambiguity, but the policy seems to dictate we use it. M. Lucretius Agricola 15:26, 16 July 2006 (CDT)
- How about Publicity Material (Nova Roma)? Cordus 09:30, 16 July 2006 (CDT)
