User talk:Aldus Marius Peregrinus
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(removed Note to Self; saved to offline text file) |
(''Amici dignitatis'' article) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == ''Amici dignitatis'' article == | ||
| + | Thanks for adding that information about the name and the reasoning behind it. Does the article in general strike you as reasonably fair and accurate? If anything I tried to err on the side of being too positive about the group, on the assumption that there are fewer people around to stick up for it than there are who are likely to disparage it; but as for accuracy, I'm limited by not having been around at the time and being reliant on the public archives of the 'main list', which have holes in them at some important moments (in particular about four weeks of messages are missing between the middle of February and the middle of March 2001 - a rather crucial moment, I imagine!). | ||
| + | |||
| + | - [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 21:06, 16 July 2007 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 19:07, 16 July 2007
Amici dignitatis article
Thanks for adding that information about the name and the reasoning behind it. Does the article in general strike you as reasonably fair and accurate? If anything I tried to err on the side of being too positive about the group, on the assumption that there are fewer people around to stick up for it than there are who are likely to disparage it; but as for accuracy, I'm limited by not having been around at the time and being reliant on the public archives of the 'main list', which have holes in them at some important moments (in particular about four weeks of messages are missing between the middle of February and the middle of March 2001 - a rather crucial moment, I imagine!).
- Cordus 21:06, 16 July 2007 (CEST)
