Talk:Codex Iuris Novae Romae
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(agree) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
With this one I must voice a protest (perhaps not a fully blown protest). Might I suggest amending ''Collegium Pontificum and other Religious bodies'' to something that doesn't highlight the rather modern concept of the seperation of religion and the State, like, for example, ''the Sacred Colleges''? [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Q. Caecilius Metellus]], [[Pontifex (Nova Roma)|Pontifex]] | With this one I must voice a protest (perhaps not a fully blown protest). Might I suggest amending ''Collegium Pontificum and other Religious bodies'' to something that doesn't highlight the rather modern concept of the seperation of religion and the State, like, for example, ''the Sacred Colleges''? [[User:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus|Q. Caecilius Metellus]], [[Pontifex (Nova Roma)|Pontifex]] | ||
:''Sacred Colleges'' sounds good to me. What we have now is too long. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 05:51, 25 June 2006 (CDT) | :''Sacred Colleges'' sounds good to me. What we have now is too long. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 05:51, 25 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hey I can read the page CJNR; it is clear & lucid!! | ||
Revision as of 01:29, 26 August 2007
With this one I must voice a protest (perhaps not a fully blown protest). Might I suggest amending Collegium Pontificum and other Religious bodies to something that doesn't highlight the rather modern concept of the seperation of religion and the State, like, for example, the Sacred Colleges? Q. Caecilius Metellus, Pontifex
- Sacred Colleges sounds good to me. What we have now is too long. M. Lucretius Agricola 05:51, 25 June 2006 (CDT)
Hey I can read the page CJNR; it is clear & lucid!!
