Talk:Curtia

From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(where to put things.)
 
(Yes, and.)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Info about the historical gens should be at [[Curtius]], perhaps "Gens Curtia", but in any case there should be no "(Nova Roma)" tag. See [[Lucretius]] for an example. A description of the Lacus Curtius should be at [[Lacus Curtius]] with inclusion in [[:Category:Archaeological sites in Rome]]. See [[Aedes_Herculi_Olivarii]] for an example. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 04:14, 14 August 2007 (CEST)
 
Info about the historical gens should be at [[Curtius]], perhaps "Gens Curtia", but in any case there should be no "(Nova Roma)" tag. See [[Lucretius]] for an example. A description of the Lacus Curtius should be at [[Lacus Curtius]] with inclusion in [[:Category:Archaeological sites in Rome]]. See [[Aedes_Herculi_Olivarii]] for an example. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 04:14, 14 August 2007 (CEST)
 +
 +
:Agreed; I also suggest that any information about the modern ''gens'' should go on the [[:Category:Gens Curtia (Nova Roma)|category page]] rather than a separate article.  For reasons see the most recent passage in [[Category talk:Gens Caecilia (Nova Roma)|this discussion]].
 +
 +
:- [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 16:46, 14 August 2007 (CEST)

Revision as of 14:47, 14 August 2007

Where to put this stuff

Info about the historical gens should be at Curtius, perhaps "Gens Curtia", but in any case there should be no "(Nova Roma)" tag. See Lucretius for an example. A description of the Lacus Curtius should be at Lacus Curtius with inclusion in Category:Archaeological sites in Rome. See Aedes_Herculi_Olivarii for an example. Agricola 04:14, 14 August 2007 (CEST)

Agreed; I also suggest that any information about the modern gens should go on the category page rather than a separate article. For reasons see the most recent passage in this discussion.
- Cordus 16:46, 14 August 2007 (CEST)
Personal tools