Talk:Comitia centuriata (Nova Roma)
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: I think that there is a mistake in the 1st line of the 2nd paragraph. I didn’t correct it myself because I’m not totally sure of it. But I’m convinced that in our days there are 59 C...) |
(reply) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I didn’t correct it myself because I’m not totally sure of it. But I’m convinced that in our days there are 59 Centuries and not 51. | I didn’t correct it myself because I’m not totally sure of it. But I’m convinced that in our days there are 59 Centuries and not 51. | ||
[[User:Gaius Aemilius Crassus|Gaius Aemilius Crassus]] 19:36, 8 November 2007 (CET) | [[User:Gaius Aemilius Crassus|Gaius Aemilius Crassus]] 19:36, 8 November 2007 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Yes, your point is correct. The century’s number was corrected to 59.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus|Sabinus]] 21:00, 8 November 2007 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 20:01, 8 November 2007
I think that there is a mistake in the 1st line of the 2nd paragraph. I didn’t correct it myself because I’m not totally sure of it. But I’m convinced that in our days there are 59 Centuries and not 51. Gaius Aemilius Crassus 19:36, 8 November 2007 (CET)
- Yes, your point is correct. The century’s number was corrected to 59.Sabinus 21:00, 8 November 2007 (CET)