Talk:Victims of religious intolerance
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: Great project! I'm just wondering if the heroes we want to honour and commemorate would right be offended by the term "pagan", the word by which their prosecutors called them because of c...) |
m (typo) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Great project! | Great project! | ||
| − | I'm just wondering if the heroes we want to honour and commemorate would right be offended by the term "pagan", the word by which their | + | I'm just wondering if the heroes we want to honour and commemorate would right be offended by the term "pagan", the word by which their persecutors called them because of contempt and disdain, but a word these heroes of Roman religion would '''never''' call themselves. They called themselves traditional Romans, preserves of the cults of our forefathers, and loathed the insults of those who attacked them as "pagans". Because of pride and respect, we should call them on the name they called themselves. Magister Aranearius --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 03:24, 30 January 2010 (CET) |
Revision as of 16:18, 30 January 2010
Great project!
I'm just wondering if the heroes we want to honour and commemorate would right be offended by the term "pagan", the word by which their persecutors called them because of contempt and disdain, but a word these heroes of Roman religion would never call themselves. They called themselves traditional Romans, preserves of the cults of our forefathers, and loathed the insults of those who attacked them as "pagans". Because of pride and respect, we should call them on the name they called themselves. Magister Aranearius --Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus 03:24, 30 January 2010 (CET)
