User talk:Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Postumianus

From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Thank you...)
m (cleanup; return to CTF)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Pontifex maximus ==
+
{{Cultus Task Force|Member}}
 
+
''Salve, amice!'' For the time being, we have to let M. Piscinus be recorded with the title ''pontifex maximus'', until we do not elect another ''pontifex maximus''. M. Antonius most clearly refused it, and the second elected was M. Piscinus. So, there are two possibilities: '''1''') the ''pontifex maximus'' remained the sitting one (because Antonius refused it), '''2''') if the first elected refused it, the second one got it (Piscinus). But anyway, and by all means, this question is dubious at best, and the best we can do is to move with the common sense, common opinion, as our citizenry and the magistrates still dealt with, negotiated with, and called him as ''pontifex maximus'' after the last voting, up to this day. Let's focus instead on the '''clear''' thing: an election is in process now, which will give a '''clear''' result: that should be what we shall record here. --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 10:55, 8 November 2010 (CET)
+
* I agree with Lentulus with all. The current new PM election will solve all.[[User:Titus Iulius Sabinus|Titus Iulius Sabinus]] 12:11, 8 November 2010 (CET)
+
 
+
== Thank you... ==
+
 
+
...for doing [[Tax rate MMDCCLXIV|this]], Q. Metelle!
+
--[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 13:57, 31 August 2011 (CEST)
+

Revision as of 08:25, 6 September 2012

Platner-temple-line-trans-50.gif

Cultus Task Force
Member

A multilingual project to improve the Cultus Deorum documents on this site.
Personal tools