Talk:Publicity material
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(Name of article?) |
(agree) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It looks from the context of the link from [[:Category:Legiones]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT) | It looks from the context of the link from [[:Category:Legiones]] as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | :Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date. | ||
Revision as of 13:30, 13 July 2006
It looks from the context of the link from Category:Legiones as though what "Nova Roma literature" means here is "publicity material for Nova Roma". If so, I suggest re-naming the article, because a lot of people clicking "Nova Roma literature" will be expecting poetry, plays, novels, &c. Cordus 06:31, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
- Correct. I took the name from the old website, but I take your point. "publicity material for Nova Roma" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, though. Let's try to think of a good name. And while I'm at it, maybe the Egressus people have some material, because the little scrap on the website is very very out of date.
