Talk:Sessions of the Senate (Nova Roma)

Naming of reports

This year I settled upon titles such as "Senate Vote Februarius MMDCCLXI (Nova Roma)"

I think that this is clear as to the nature of the article (a Senate report) and it uses a minimal date (Roman month name and year AUC) that is enough to establish a rough chronology. If there were another report in the same month it would have been "Senate Vote Februarius MMDCCLXI II (Nova Roma)" or suchlike.

I understand the idea of numbering, but I don't have a date to numbers table, so if the report does not mention the number internally there is no way to match a given report to the session number. Agricola 01:54, 4 August 2008 (CEST)