Category talk:Religio Romana

From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(I checked, there are 2 cats...)
(I see...)
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
- [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 16:31, 28 June 2007 (CEST)
 
- [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 16:31, 28 June 2007 (CEST)
 
:This page is Cat:Religio Romana, full stop. The other is Cat:Religio Romana (Nova Roma). This is for the historical stuff, the other is for the reconstruction as practiced in NR. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 05:40, 30 June 2007 (CEST)
 
:This page is Cat:Religio Romana, full stop. The other is Cat:Religio Romana (Nova Roma). This is for the historical stuff, the other is for the reconstruction as practiced in NR. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 05:40, 30 June 2007 (CEST)
 +
 +
::Ah, my sloppy reading.  Thanks!
 +
::- [[User:Aulus Apollonius Cordus|Cordus]] 20:55, 30 June 2007 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 18:57, 30 June 2007

why do you have to mention christian? I'd edit it out. Maior

I think that's there to distinguish the Religio from the post-Christian religion of the City, that being Catholicism. Rome has been the center of many things besides Roman Civilisation. Just my guess... -- Marius Peregrinus 09:14, 26 June 2007 (CEST)

Circular linking?

Under the heading "As practised in Nova Roma" is the sentence "For details on how religio is practised in Nova Roma, see Category:Religio Romana (Nova Roma)". Since this page is Category:Religio Romana (Nova Roma), I'm wondering how helpful this link is. Can anyone remember what it was meant to achieve?

- Cordus 16:31, 28 June 2007 (CEST)

This page is Cat:Religio Romana, full stop. The other is Cat:Religio Romana (Nova Roma). This is for the historical stuff, the other is for the reconstruction as practiced in NR. Agricola 05:40, 30 June 2007 (CEST)
Ah, my sloppy reading. Thanks!
- Cordus 20:55, 30 June 2007 (CEST)