Talk:Clio
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(title of the article) |
(cat?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Category?== | ||
| + | |||
| + | How shall we categorize this? My gut tells me that it isn't really a good fit in the Religio Romana cat. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 07:07, 2 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
==Titles of articles== | ==Titles of articles== | ||
[[Clio]] should properly be about Clio, in antiquity. That article, when written, could link to an article about the collegium. For now, if the article about the collegium is short, why not add it in place [[Sodalitas_Musarum#Clio_.28History_and_Social_Science.29|here]]? Otherwise, we can move this one to [[Collegium Clius (Nova Roma)]] [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 01:17, 2 September 2007 (CEST) | [[Clio]] should properly be about Clio, in antiquity. That article, when written, could link to an article about the collegium. For now, if the article about the collegium is short, why not add it in place [[Sodalitas_Musarum#Clio_.28History_and_Social_Science.29|here]]? Otherwise, we can move this one to [[Collegium Clius (Nova Roma)]] [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 01:17, 2 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:09, 2 September 2007
Category?
How shall we categorize this? My gut tells me that it isn't really a good fit in the Religio Romana cat. Agricola 07:07, 2 September 2007 (CEST)
Titles of articles
Clio should properly be about Clio, in antiquity. That article, when written, could link to an article about the collegium. For now, if the article about the collegium is short, why not add it in place here? Otherwise, we can move this one to Collegium Clius (Nova Roma) Agricola 01:17, 2 September 2007 (CEST)
