Election 2006:Constitutional Amendments (Nova Roma)

From NovaRoma
Jump to: navigation, search

THIS IS AN ARCHIVED PAGE DOCUMENTING THE INTERNAL HISTORY OF NOVA ROMA: LEARN MORE ABOUT ARCHIVED PAGES



Contents

These leges are currently PENDING APPROVAL.

Voting by Comitia centuriata
Begins 30 November 2006, 21:00 Roman Time
Ends 05 December 2006, 21:00 Roman Time

Amendment I

Section II "Citizens and Gentes"

Clause 3 concerning the rights of citizens reads:

"The right to vote in elections as members of their various comitia on matters brought
 before the People in such manner as described in the Constitution...

PROPOSED CHANGE:

The rights of the Iura Publica: 
i. The right to vote in elections as members of their various comitia
   on matters brought before the People in such manner as described
   in this constitution and pursuant laws.
ii. The right to candidate for public office where eligible, as
    determined by this constitution and pursuant laws.


Amendment II

II "Citizens and Gentes" Section B

Clause 5 concerning the right of Provocatio currently reads

"The right of provocatio: to appeal the decision of a magistrate that
 has a direct negative impact on that citizen to the Comitia Populi
 Tributa".

PROPOSED CHANGE:

The right of Provocatio ad populum: to appeal a loss of citizenship
(exactio) to the Comitia Centuriata. 

(And in a separate clause)...The right of Appellatio:

i) to appeal a magisterial decision which has a direct negative impact
   on that citizen to the Comitia Populi Tributa, such appeal may not
   be denied by the magistrate against whom the appeal is made.
ii) to appeal a court decision (sententia) not involving loss of
    citizenship to the Comitia Populi Tributa, or optionally in
    the case of a citizen of the Plebeian Order, to the Comitia
    Plebis Tributa.


Amendment III

II Section B 'Comitia Centuriata'

From 3 (concerning the Comitia Centuriata) the Constitution currently reads:

"to try legal cases in which the defendant is subject to
 permanent removal of citizenship"

PROPOSED CHANGE:

"to render verdicts in appeals of Provocatio ad populum in which the
 defendant (reus) is subject to loss of citizenship."


  • ALSO PROPOSED are corresponding changes to the pertinent language

regarding the remaining two comitia, to wit:


Clause 3 concerning Comitia Plebis Tributa currently reads:

"To try legal cases solely involving members of the Plebeian Order that
 do not involve permanent removal of citizenship"...

PROPOSED CHANGE:

"To render verdicts in appeals of court rulings (sententia) by members
 of the Plebeian Order which do not involve removal of citizenship."


Clause 3 concerning Comitia Populi Tributa reads:

"To try legal cases that do not involve permanent removal of citizenship"

PROPOSED CHANGE:

"To render verdicts in appeals which do not involve removal of
 citizenship."


Discussion: The changes of Amendment III above reflect a more historical role of comitia in the judicial process and correspond more accurately with the language of our NR judicial system as detailed in the leges Saliciae Iudiciaria et Poenalis, links here:

2002-11-24-iii and 2003-10-08-ii

Citizens of Nova Roma are tried by the Leges Salicia procedures and the Iudices (judges) render a decison....Appeals of the decisions arising from these proceedings, if any, are decided by the appropriate comitia as revised above. We do not have a separate 'trial' system within each comitia as the current constitutional language implies.


Amendment IV

IV Magistrates 1. 'Censor'

1. f. 1. reads

"A nota against an ordinary individual is sufficient to deprive that
 individual of the right to vote until such time as it is removed "

PROPOSED CHANGE:

"A nota against a citizen is sufficient to deprive him of the Iura
 Publica until such time as the nota is removed".

(remainder of constitutional language of 1.f.1. to remain unchanged)

Personal tools