Roman name
(+ agnomen) |
m (compress white space) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The system of Roman names was very unusual in the ancient world. Names in most other ancient Indo-Euopean cultures did not include an inherited name that indicated lineage within a clan, as did the Roman ''nomen'' <ref name="salway">Salway, B. (1994), "What's in a name? A Survey of Roman Onomastic Practice from 700 B.C. to A. D. 700", The Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 84, pp. 124-145 {{JSTOR|300873}}</ref>. Starting from relatively simple beginnings, as time progressed, Roman names became longer and more complex, including more information about the person named. A foreigner becoming a Roman citizen took a new Roman name as a mark of citizenship. | The system of Roman names was very unusual in the ancient world. Names in most other ancient Indo-Euopean cultures did not include an inherited name that indicated lineage within a clan, as did the Roman ''nomen'' <ref name="salway">Salway, B. (1994), "What's in a name? A Survey of Roman Onomastic Practice from 700 B.C. to A. D. 700", The Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 84, pp. 124-145 {{JSTOR|300873}}</ref>. Starting from relatively simple beginnings, as time progressed, Roman names became longer and more complex, including more information about the person named. A foreigner becoming a Roman citizen took a new Roman name as a mark of citizenship. | ||
{{Template:Roman name articles}} | {{Template:Roman name articles}} | ||
| − | |||
<onlyinclude> | <onlyinclude> | ||
==''Tria Nomina''== | ==''Tria Nomina''== | ||
| Line 78: | Line 77: | ||
Under condition of adoption, one's ''praenomen'' was kept, but the ''nomen'' and ''cognomen'' (together indicating a ''familia'') of the adoptive father were adopted, and the filiation was changed to refer to the adoptive father. The adoptive son's ''nomen'' of birth was appended as a second ''cognomen'' in adjectival form. As an example, when P. Aemelius L. f. Paulus was adopted by P. Cornelius Scipio Africanus he used the name P. Cornelius P. f. Scipio Aemelianus. | Under condition of adoption, one's ''praenomen'' was kept, but the ''nomen'' and ''cognomen'' (together indicating a ''familia'') of the adoptive father were adopted, and the filiation was changed to refer to the adoptive father. The adoptive son's ''nomen'' of birth was appended as a second ''cognomen'' in adjectival form. As an example, when P. Aemelius L. f. Paulus was adopted by P. Cornelius Scipio Africanus he used the name P. Cornelius P. f. Scipio Aemelianus. | ||
| − | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 92: | Line 90: | ||
| name=[[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] | | name=[[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:Ancient Rome]] | [[Category:Ancient Rome]] | ||
Revision as of 05:13, 5 August 2008
IN·MEMORIAM·A·TVLLIAE·SCHOLASTICAE·AVGVSTAE·PRINCIPIS·SENATVS·CENSORIS·IIII·CONSVLIS·II·PRAETRICIS
Home| Latíné | Deutsch | Español | Français | Italiano | Magyar | Português | Română | Русский | English
The system of Roman names was very unusual in the ancient world. Names in most other ancient Indo-Euopean cultures did not include an inherited name that indicated lineage within a clan, as did the Roman nomen [1]. Starting from relatively simple beginnings, as time progressed, Roman names became longer and more complex, including more information about the person named. A foreigner becoming a Roman citizen took a new Roman name as a mark of citizenship.
·Ancient Rome ·
Roman name - Praenomen -
Nomen -
Cognomen -
Agnomen
·Nova Roma·
Choosing a Roman name -
Using Roman names
Contents |
Tria Nomina
Typical Roman names of the late Republic had three parts (the "tria nomina"). Example: Gaius Iulius Caesar where:
- Gaius is a praenomen ("given name", plural praenomina),
- Iulius is a nomen ("gens or clan name", plural nomina), and
- Caesar is a cognomen ("family name within a gens", plural cognomina).
Some names had no cognomen, but in other cases a second cognomen, (called an agnomen), was added. Female names could follow similar conventions, with a few differences. Additional elements such as tribal affiliation and "filiation" (parentage), were also sometimes used. [1]
Development
Early social organization in central Italy was centered around the gens, (clan), an "aristocratic lineage or group of lineages and some of their lesser followers and dependents". [2] Inscriptions from the 7th century BCE show names consisting by that date of praenomen (identifies the individual) and nomen (identifies the gens). [2]
Later, an additional element, the cognomen, was added by aristocrats desiring to connect themselves with the great deeds of specific direct ancestors. Still, some "families never had a cognomen" [2]
Female Names
Elements of a name
Praenomen
(Praenomen, plural: praenomina) This form of "first" name was relatively unimportant, and was rarely used on its own outside of the family. There are relatively few praenomina that were commonly used in the Republican era of Rome. Read more about praenomina.
Nomen
(Nomen plural: nomina) The second name or nomen is the name of the gens (clan) in masculine form; the Latin word "gens" is feminine, so the name appears as feminine in our lists. Read more about nomina.
Cognomen
(Cognomen, plural: cognomina) The third name or cognomen started to be a nickname or personal name that distinguished individuals within the same gens (the cognomen does not appear in official documents until around 100 BCE). During the Roman Republic, the cognomen is inherited from father to son, serving to distinguish a family within a gens. Often the cognomen was chosen based on some physical or personality trait. Read more about cognomina.
Agnomen
Under some circumstances Romans were given an additional cognomen, called an agnomen. These were the exception to the general rule that cognomina were not complimentary.
Read more about agnomina.
Filiation
Originally, the praenomen and nomen constituted a Roman's full name and were followed by the so-called filiation (a patronymic or indication of paternity)[1]. The filiation (patronymicus) consisted of the Latin word for "son," filius (abbreviated by the letter f.), preceded by the abbreviation of the father's praenomen, which was understood in the genitive case. Hence, a Roman might have been known as
M. Antonius M. f. (=Marci filius), that is, Marcus Antonius, the son of Marcus.
Additionally it could also indicate the grandfather with the word "grandson," nepos (abbreviated by the letter n.).
Tribal affiliation
A tribe was not an indication of common ancestry; the tribes were distributed geographically and a man belonged to the tribe in which his main residence was located. The tribe was an essential part of citizenship, since voting was often carried out by tribe. By the Middle Republic the abbreviation for tribe in which the person was enrolled was added to the person's name. Read more about tribes.
Examples
Marcus Aurelius Marci f. Quinti n. tribu Galeria Antoninus Pius.
- praenomen: Marcus
- nomen: Aurelius (he belongs to gens Aurelia, the Aurelii in plural)
- patronymicus: Marci f. (son of Marcus)
- grandparent: Quinti n. (grandson of Quintus)
- tribe: tribu Galeria (a tribe from the region of Caesaraugusta in Hispania)
- cognomen: Antoninus (family of the Antonini)
- agnomen: Pius (probably because of his piety...rarely inherited))
Usage
In everyday use, people are referred to by either a combination of the praenomen and nomen, or even more usually by just their cognomen.
- "Marcus Livius Drusus" would either be just "Drusus" or "Marcus Livius."
- "Iulia Marciana" would be just "Iulia." (See using Roman names for more on this topic.)
Adoption
Under condition of adoption, one's praenomen was kept, but the nomen and cognomen (together indicating a familia) of the adoptive father were adopted, and the filiation was changed to refer to the adoptive father. The adoptive son's nomen of birth was appended as a second cognomen in adjectival form. As an example, when P. Aemelius L. f. Paulus was adopted by P. Cornelius Scipio Africanus he used the name P. Cornelius P. f. Scipio Aemelianus.
References
- ↑ 1.1 1.2 1.3 Salway, B. (1994), "What's in a name? A Survey of Roman Onomastic Practice from 700 B.C. to A. D. 700", The Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 84, pp. 124-145 (Retrieve from JSTOR)
- ↑ 2.1 2.2 2.3 Boatwright, M., Gargola, D., Talbert, R. (2004), "The Romans From Village to Empire", Oxford University Press.
Personal Names in the Roman World
Paperback, 160 pages Contributed by Agricola
Buy from Amazon: Canada UK USA
