Talk:Latin language
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(new refs) |
(It's OK for me.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Do you have specific examples and suggestions for replacement content? [[User:Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus|Caelius]] September 9, {{2008}} | Do you have specific examples and suggestions for replacement content? [[User:Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus|Caelius]] September 9, {{2008}} | ||
:salve! I have already replaced the worst stuff. Take a look at the refs. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 05:09, 10 September 2008 (CEST) | :salve! I have already replaced the worst stuff. Take a look at the refs. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 05:09, 10 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == It's OK for me. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This new version is better, I agree with Agricola. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus|Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus]] 12:31, 10 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 10:32, 10 September 2008
I strongly object to the unsubstantiated claims made about the modern teaching of Latin. They are as insulting as they are untrue. Agricola 01:42, 10 September 2008 (CEST)
Teaching methodologies insulting?
Do you have specific examples and suggestions for replacement content? Caelius September 9, M. Moravio T. Iulio cos. ‡ MMDCCLXI a.u.c.
- salve! I have already replaced the worst stuff. Take a look at the refs. Agricola 05:09, 10 September 2008 (CEST)
It's OK for me.
This new version is better, I agree with Agricola.
--Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus 12:31, 10 September 2008 (CEST)
