Category talk:Religio Romana (Nova Roma)
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
(should rename) |
(Add the reading list?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Let's rename this to [[:Category:Religio Romana]] - these articles are about ancient practices, and therefore don't need the modern suffix. [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 07:39, 23 October 2006 (CDT) | Let's rename this to [[:Category:Religio Romana]] - these articles are about ancient practices, and therefore don't need the modern suffix. [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 07:39, 23 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Reading list?== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should the [[Reading list for the cultus deorum]] be added to this category? [[Joining Nova Roma]] links to the History reading list and to this category, but the category does not lead to a Religio reading list. ([[:Category:Religio Romana]] does.) -- [[User:Aldus Marius Peregrinus|Marius Peregrinus]] 20:08, 14 December 2007 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:09, 14 December 2007
Let's rename this to Category:Religio Romana - these articles are about ancient practices, and therefore don't need the modern suffix. Marcus Octavius Germanicus(t) 07:39, 23 October 2006 (CDT)
Reading list?
Should the Reading list for the cultus deorum be added to this category? Joining Nova Roma links to the History reading list and to this category, but the category does not lead to a Religio reading list. (Category:Religio Romana does.) -- Marius Peregrinus 20:08, 14 December 2007 (CET)
