Template talk:LanguageBar
(→Esperanto: not needed) |
(→Esperanto) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
I know that Esperanto is promoted as a "universal" language, but it is only seen as such by Europeans. For people who do not use the Latin alphabet or do not speak a Romance language it is just another foreign language. It may have simpler syntax than English, but English syntax has not prevented English from becoming the most studied language in the world. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 16:59, 25 April 2006 (CDT) | I know that Esperanto is promoted as a "universal" language, but it is only seen as such by Europeans. For people who do not use the Latin alphabet or do not speak a Romance language it is just another foreign language. It may have simpler syntax than English, but English syntax has not prevented English from becoming the most studied language in the world. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|M. Lucretius Agricola]] 16:59, 25 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
| − | I think its inclusion should wait until we have a translator appointed; there's no sense in adding lots of links to pages that will never exist. [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 17:18, 25 April 2006 (CDT) | + | :I think its inclusion should wait until we have a translator appointed; there's no sense in adding lots of links to pages that will never exist. [[User:Marcus Octavius Germanicus|Marcus Octavius Germanicus]][[User talk:Marcus Octavius Germanicus|<sup><font color="green" size="-2">(t)</font></sup>]] 17:18, 25 April 2006 (CDT) |
| + | |||
| + | ::I agree that it is preposterous to add Esperanto, especially in the context of Nova Roma. We have our own Roman, international language already, and that is of course Latin. [[User:Aulus Gratius Garseius Avitus|A. Gratius Avitus]] 18:06, 4 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:07, 4 July 2006
Floating the bar
Unless some wiki feature breaks it, you can replace
<div align="center">
with
<div style="margin:auto">
to avoid using deprecated features. If we then use
<div style="margin:auto;clear:both">
we should prevent anything wrapping with this bar. (Or we could use
<br style="clear:both" />
above and below.) The next step is to eliminate the table entirely and use "float:left" for each cell. You can see the gory details in Template:FourUp where padding and margins are used to make a nice display. The advantage to this is that if they down't fit in the screen width, the elements in the bar will wrap rather than force a horizontal scroll. M. Lucretius Agricola 10:01, 9 April 2006 (CDT)
Esperanto
I'm not sure that including Esperanto really gives us very much. It is not very widely used outside of the sphere of the Romance languages, and we have those covered pretty well. If we are going for completeness, a good case could be made for Finnish. That would probably serve more people. (5 million people at least speak Finnish. 2 million people at most speak Esperanto.) Of course, if we have an Esperanto translator eager and waiting, then by all means we should go ahead.
I know that Esperanto is promoted as a "universal" language, but it is only seen as such by Europeans. For people who do not use the Latin alphabet or do not speak a Romance language it is just another foreign language. It may have simpler syntax than English, but English syntax has not prevented English from becoming the most studied language in the world. M. Lucretius Agricola 16:59, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
- I think its inclusion should wait until we have a translator appointed; there's no sense in adding lots of links to pages that will never exist. Marcus Octavius Germanicus(t) 17:18, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
- I agree that it is preposterous to add Esperanto, especially in the context of Nova Roma. We have our own Roman, international language already, and that is of course Latin. A. Gratius Avitus 18:06, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
