Talk:Latin language
From NovaRoma
(Difference between revisions)
m |
(new refs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Do you have specific examples and suggestions for replacement content? [[User:Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus|Caelius]] September 9, {{2008}} | Do you have specific examples and suggestions for replacement content? [[User:Gnaeus Caelius Ahenobarbus|Caelius]] September 9, {{2008}} | ||
| + | :salve! I have already replaced the worst stuff. Take a look at the refs. [[User:M. Lucretius Agricola|Agricola]] 05:09, 10 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 03:10, 10 September 2008
I strongly object to the unsubstantiated claims made about the modern teaching of Latin. They are as insulting as they are untrue. Agricola 01:42, 10 September 2008 (CEST)
Teaching methodologies insulting?
Do you have specific examples and suggestions for replacement content? Caelius September 9, M. Moravio T. Iulio cos. ‡ MMDCCLXI a.u.c.
- salve! I have already replaced the worst stuff. Take a look at the refs. Agricola 05:09, 10 September 2008 (CEST)
