User talk:Marcus Octavius Gracchus

Revision as of 02:56, 17 March 2006

"Please read the guidelines - and the mailing list - before creating new articles. The titles for your new articles are incorrect, as are the links within. The contribution is appreciated, but this will require substantial cleanup."

Ok, but I've been specifically asked by a Praetor to move here my Codex in the form it is on my personal website. In such, I understand my naming of articles is incorrect, but what would be the correct way then, being that those are not exacly Nova Roma articles -the codex isn't an official document-, hence requiring the (Nova Roma) thing, nor totally outside it -being made from the nova roman laws-. I'm up for suggestions and/or directions.

--Domitius Constantinus Fuscus 10:27, 9 March 2006 (CST)

Ok, I see and I'll stick to the guidelines as expressed. There is one thing tho. I shall not import nor use the Tabularium laws, as I was told that someone else will import them to recreate the Tabularium we already have on novroma.org here. What I shall do, and concurred with Praetor Octavius Pius, is to recreate the codex, which means I'll put on the consolidates leges (which obviously are not to be found in the Tabularium, which is what causes teh most troubles), while linking to the laws that will be imported with the ones that are either amending the laws present in the codex or that have not been amended at all. In that optic, I see it's probably better I call those leges name_of_the_lex_consolidated, to avoid mixing them with the original version that will be imported in teh tabularium. Or not?

If you never gave a look at the codex, it is at http://village.flashnet.it/~ua01823/Codex/.

Incidentally, wouldn't be easier to move this to email?

--Domitius Constantinus Fuscus 10:46, 9 March 2006 (CST)

QIFTEST: test_successful

sigtest

test signature -- Marcus Octavius Germanicus^(t) 20:55, 16 March 2006 (CST)