Talk:Lex Fabia de ratione comitiorum centuriatorum (Nova Roma)

From NovaRoma
Jump to: navigation, search

II.B : Commentary

Discretion of presiding magistrate

It is implied, of course, that if a candidate does not have "whatever qualifications are required by law" the presiding magistrate must exclude him from the ballot. That the presiding magistrate has the power to do so is undoubted.

Moreover, it appears that, as in the ancient republic, the presiding magistrate has a discretionary power to exclude a candidate from the ballot if he considers it proper to do so, even if the candidate meets all the technical requirements laid down in the relevant leges. For example, M. Arminius tribunus plebis a. d. V Kal. Dec. M. Octavio L. Sulla (II) cos. MMDCCLV a.u.c., said in the forum (message 5701 in the archive):

Yes, i plan to mantain the same candidates in the ballot for the next elections for Tribunus Plebis. But i will accept new names for Aedilis Plebeius, since we have a free position.

M. Curiatio M. Iulio cos. MMDCCLXII a.u.c. amendment

I added the amendment through inclusion of the original document. I would have thought that it would have been better to leave the original lex as it was and simply strike out the part amended. I wish people would ask before doing things in a difficult way. /\⁄\ |_ ⁄·\ 11:33, 16 November 2009 (CET)

Personal tools